
Полная версия
The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India, Volume 3
Ibidem, ii. pp. 481, 482.
166
Ibidem, ii. pp. 487–489.
167
This article is compiled from a paper by Mr. Bābu Rao, Deputy Inspector of Schools, Seoni District.
168
In this year only 33 Holias were returned as against more than 4000 in 1891; but, on the other hand, in 1901 the number of Golars was double that of the previous census.
169
Mysore Census Report (1891), p. 254.
170
Ethnographic Notes in Southern India, p. 258.
171
This article is principally based on information collected by Mr. Hīra Lāl in Bhandāra.
172
A corruption of Uika.
173
See the articles Mahār and Kunbi.
174
This article is partly based on a paper by Bihāri Lāl, Patwāri, of Hoshangābād.
175
Semaria is a common name of villages, and is of course as such derived from the semar tree, but the argument is that the Jādams took the name from the village and not from the tree. Totem is perhaps rather a strong word for the kind of veneration paid; the vernacular term used in Bombay is devak.
176
This article is based on an account of the Jāduas by Mr. A. Knyvett, Superintendent of Police, Patna, and kindly communicated by Mr. C. W. C. Plowden, Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Bengal, through Mr. G. W. Gayer, in charge of the Central Provinces Criminal Investigation Department.
177
Sherring, Castes and Tribes, iii. p. 123.
178
The nut of Eleocarpus lanceolatus.
179
Aegle marmelos.
180
Hindu Manners, Customs, and Ceremonies, 1897 ed. p. 118.
181
This article is partly based on information contributed by Mr. Debendra Nāth Dutt, Pleader, Narsinghpur; Mr. Ganga Singh, Extra Assistant Commissioner, Hoshangābād; and Mr. Adurām Chaudhri of the Gazetteer Office. The correct pronunciation of the caste name is Jat, but in the Central Provinces it is always called Jāt.
182
Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 421.
183
Early History of India.
184
Mahābhārata, viii. 2026, et seq., translated by Professor H. H. Wilson, and quoted in vol. i. pp. 260, 262 of Dr. J. Wilson’s Indian Caste.
185
Ibidem, paras. 422–424.
186
Kashyap was a Rishi or saint, but he may probably have developed into an eponymous hero from Kachhap, a tortoise.
187
Hoshangābād Settlement Report, p. 62.
188
Aegle marmelos.
189
Hoshangābād Settlement Report, loc. cit.
190
This article is entirely based on an account of the caste furnished by Rai Bahādur Panda Baijnāth, Superintendent, Bastar State.
191
Bassia latifolia.
192
Boswellia serrata.
193
This has been fully demonstrated by Sir J. G. Frazer in The Golden Bough.
194
Colebrooke’s Essays.
195
Quoting from Dr. George Smith’s Life of Dr. Wilson, p. 74.
196
Ibidem, pp. 13–15.
197
Weber’s Indian Literature, p. 239.
198
Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, chap, lxiii.
199
Republished in the Theosophist.
200
Eastern India, ii. p. 756.
201
Travels in the Mughal Empire, Constable’s edition, p. 316.
202
Rājasthān, ii. p. 19.
203
Maclagan, l.c. p. 115.
204
Ibidem, l.c.
205
Maclagan, l.c.
206
Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Kanphata.
207
Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Jogi.
208
Sleeman, Report on the Badhaks, pp. 332, 333.
209
These proverbs are taken from Temple and Fallon’s Hindustāni Proverbs.
210
Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xxi. p. 184.
211
Phaseolus radiatus.
212
Newcomb’s Astronomy for Everybody, p. 33.
213
Owing to the precession of the equinoxes, the sidereal year is not the same as the solar year, being about 20 minutes longer. That is, the sun passes a particular star a second time in a period of 365 days 6 hours and 9 minutes, while it passes the equatorial point in 365 days 5 hours 48 minutes 49 seconds, this latter period being the solar year. The difference is due to slight changes in the direction of the earth’s axis, which change the position of the celestial equator and of the equinoctial point where the sun crosses it. It is not clear how the Hindus get over this difficulty, but the point does not affect the general account.
214
The stars corresponding to the nakshatras and their symbols are mainly taken from Mr. L. D. Barnett’s Antiquities of India, pp. 190, 191, compared with the list in Mr. W. Brennand’s Hindu Astronomy, pp. 40, 42.
215
Taken from Professor Newcomb’s Astronomy for Everybody.
216
The moon’s orbit is really an ellipse like that of the earth and all the planets.
217
Barnett, op. cit. p. 190.
218
The Indian Calendar, by Messrs. Sewell and Dikshit, pp. 11 and 25.
219
Brennand’s Hindu Astronomy, p. 100.
220
The Indian Calendar, Sewell and Dikshit, p. 28 and Table I.
221
This seems to have been done by some ancient Indian astronomers.
222
The Indian Calendar, p. 29.
223
Taken from Brennand’s Hindu Astronomy, p. 39.
224
Barnett, Antiquities of India, p. 193.
225
The above particulars regarding the measurement of time by the ghariāl are taken from ‘An Account of the Hindustāni Horometry’ in Asiatic Researches, vol. v. p. 81, by John Gilchrist, Esq. The account appears to be to some extent controversial, and it is possible that the arrangement of the gharis may have varied in different localities.
226
The information contained in this paragraph is taken from Captain Mackintosh’s Report on the Rāmosis, chap. iii. (India Office Library Tracts), in which a large variety of rules are given.
227
Some of these names and also some of the women’s names have been taken from Colonel Temple’s Proper Names of the Punjābis.
228
Punjāb Ethnography, para. 612.
229
This passage is taken from Sir G. Grierson’s Peasant Life in Bihār, p. 64.
230
This article is based on a paper by Mr. Pancham Lāl, naib-tahsīldār, Murwāra, with extracts from the Central Provinces Monograph on Pottery and Glassware, by Mr. Jowers, and some information collected by Mr. Hīra Lāl.
231
Dhāl means a shield, and the ornament is of this shape.
232
Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, article Kāchhi.
233
Partly based on a paper by Munshi Kanhya Lāl of the Gazetteer office.
234
Irvine, Army of the Mughals, pp. 158, 159.
235
Boswellia serrata.
236
Sesamum indicum.
237
This article is compiled from papers by Mr. Sarat Chandra Sanyāl, Sessions Judge, Nāgpur, and Mr. Abdul Samād, Tahsīldār, Sohāgpur.
238
Eastern India, ii. 426.
239
Ibidem, iii. pp. 119, 120.
240
Moor, Hindu Infanticide, p. 91.
241
Yule and Burnell’s Hobson-Jobson, Crooke’s edition, s.v. Boy.
242
Tribes and Castes of the N.W.P., art. Kahār.
243
Private Life of an Eastern King, p. 207.
244
Ibidem, pp. 200, 202.
245
Stevens, In India, p. 313.
246
Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Kahār.
247
Tribes and Castes of Bengal, ibidem.
248
S.v. Boy.
249
This article is partly compiled from papers by Mr. G. Falconer Taylor, Forest Divisional Officer, and by Kanhyā Lāl, Clerk in the Gazetteer office.
250
Berār Census Report (1881), p. 141.
251
Hislop papers. Vocabulary.
252
North Arcot Manual, p. 247.
253
1881, p. 141.
254
Ibidem.
255
Bombay Gazetteer (Campbell), vol. xii. p. 120.
256
Bombay Gazetteer (Campbell), vol. xxi. p. 172.
257
Berār Census Report (1881), p. 141.
258
Some information for this article has been supplied by Bābu Lāl, Excise Sub-Inspector, Mr. Adurām Chaudhri, Tahsīldār, and Sundar Lāl Richaria, Sub-Inspector of Police.
259
Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Kalār.
260
Bassia latifolia, the tree from whose flowers fermented liquor is made.
261
The headquarters of the Sanjāri tahsīl in Drūg District.
262
Phūlbāba, lit. ‘flower-father.’
263
This story is only transplanted, a similar one being related by Colonel Tod in the Annals of the Bundi State (Rājasthān, ii. p. 441).
264
Saccharum spontaneum.
265
Settlement Report, p. 26.
266
Mr. (Sir E.) Maclagan’s Punjab Census Report (1891).
267
Religions of India, p. 113.
268
Apparently also called Sarcostemma viminalis.
269
Bombay Gazetteer, Parsis of Guiarāt, by Messrs. Nasarvanji Girvai and Behrāmji Patel, p. 228, footnote.
270
Ibidem.
271
Hopkins, loc. cit. p. 213.
272
Rājendra Lāl Mitra, Indo-Aryans, ii. p. 419.
273
Deussen, Outlines of Indian Philosophy, p. 12.
274
Indo-Aryans, i. p. 393.
275
Ibidem, p. 396.
276
Ibidem, p. 402.
277
Indo-Aryans, i. p. 411.
278
Garrett’s Classical Dictionary, s.v. Varuni and Vishnu.
279
The Golden Bough, 2nd edition, i. pp. 359, 360.
280
Indo-Aryans, pp. 408, 409.
281
Ibidem, pp. 404, 405.
282
Indo-Aryans, pp. 405, 406.
283
Bombay Gazetteer, Poona, p. 549.
284
Cannabis sativa.
285
A liquor made from the flowers of the hemp plant, commonly drunk in the hot weather.
286
See Mr. E. Clodd’s Myths and Dreams, under Dreams.
287
A name of Siva or Mahādeo.
288
‘Victory to Shankar.’
289
A preparation of opium for smoking.
290
T. H. Hendley, Account of the Bhīls, J.A.S.B. xliv., 1875, p. 360.
291
M. Salomon Reinach in Orphéus, p. 120.
292
Sir James Frazer in Attis, Adonis, Osiris, ii. p. 241.
293
Book IV., chap. lxxv., quoted in Lane’s Modern Egyptians, p. 347.
294
Lane, Modern Egyptians, p. 348.
295
Eastern India, iii. p. 163.
296
Sir G. Watt’s Commercial Products of India, s.v. Nicotiana.
297
Ind. Ant., January 1911, p. 39.
298
Tobacco is no doubt a derivative from some American word, and Platts derives the Hindi tanbāku or tambāku from tobacco. The fact that tanbāku is also Persian for tobacco militates against the Sanskrit derivation suggested by Mr. Ganpat Rai and others, and tends to demonstrate its American importation.
299
This article is based on papers drawn up by Mr. Hīra Lāl, Extra Assistant Commissioner, Pyāre Lāl Misra, Ethnographic Clerk, and a very full account of the tribe by Mr. Ganpati Giri, Manager of Bindrānawāgarh, which has furnished the greater part of the article, especially the paragraphs on birth, religion and social customs.
300
Jungle Life in India, p. 588.
301
Criminal Tribes, p. 78.
302
Criminal Classes.
303
Berār Census Report (1881), p. 140.
304
Page 139.
305
See art. Beria, para. 1.
306
Ibbetson, Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 527.
307
Ibidem.
308
Art. Kanjar, para. 3.
309
Ibbetson.
310
Crooke, art. Dom, para. 21.
311
Lectures, p. 59.
312
Bombay Gazetteer, Muhammadans of Gujarāt, p. 83.
313
Kennedy, Criminal Tribes of Bombay, p. 257.
314
Criminal Tribes, p. 46.
315
Berār Census Report (1881), p. 140.
316
Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Dom.
317
Nesfield, l.c. p. 393.
318
Ind. Ant. xvi. p. 37.
319
Ind. Ant. xv. p. 15.
320
In Sir G. Grierson’s account the Bhojpuri version is printed in the Nāgari character; but this cannot be reproduced. It is possible that one or two mistakes have been made in transliteration.
321
Quoted in Mr. Crooke’s article on Dom.
322
Gayer, Lectures, p. 59.
323
Gunthorpe, p. 81. Mr. Kennedy says: “Sānsia and Beria women have a clove (lavang) in the left nostril; the Sānsias, but not the Berias, wear a bullāq or pendant in the fleshy part of the nose.”
324
Gayer, l.c. p. 61.
325
Crooke, l.c. para. 3.
326
In a footnote Mr. Nesfield states: “The Kanjar who communicated these facts said that the child used to open out its neck to the knife as if it desired to be sacrificed to the deity.”
327
Butea frondosa.
328
It is not, I think, used for weaving now, but only for stuffing quilts and cushions.
329
But elsewhere Mr. Nesfield says that the brushes are made from the khas-khas grass, and this is, I think, the case in the Central Provinces.
330
This article is compiled principally from a note by Mr. Paiku, Inspector of Police, Chānda.
331
This article is based principally on a paper by Nand Kishore, Bohidār, Sambalpur.
332
Hobson-Jobson, art. Cranny.
333
Eragrostis cynosuroides.
334
(London, A. & C. Black.)
335
This definition of totemism is more or less in accord with that held by the late Professor Robertson Smith, but is not generally accepted. The exhaustive collection of totemic beliefs and customs contained in Sir J. G. Frazer’s Totemism and Exogamy affords, however, substantial evidence in favour of it among tribes still in the hunting stage in Australia, North America and Africa. The Indian form of totemism is, in the writer’s opinion, a later one, arising when the totem animal has ceased to be the main source of life, and when the clan come to think that they are descended from their totem animal and that the spirits of their ancestors pass into the totem animal. When this belief arises, they cease eating the totem as a mark of veneration and respect, and abstain from killing or injuring it. Finally the totem comes to be little more than a clan-name or family name, which serves the purpose of preventing marriage between persons related through males, who believe themselves to be descended from a common ancestor.
336
Orphéus (Heinemann), p. 197.
337
Lane, Modern Egyptians, p. 248.
338
Orphéus, p. 47.
339
Ibidem, p. 50.
340
B. G. Parsis of Gujarāt, pp. 232, 241.
341
Orphéus, pp. 101, 102.
342
Ibidem, p. 204.
343
Ibidem, p. 144.
344
Ibidem, p. 169.
345
D. M. Flinders-Petrie, Egypt and Israel, p. 61.
346
Gomme, Folk-lore as a Historical Science, p. 161.
347
Haug’s Essays on the Parsis, p. 286.
348
Golden Bough, ii. pp. 299–301. See article on Kumhār.
349
Orphéus, p. 139.
350
Orphéus, pp. 119, 120.
351
Ibidem, p. 144.
352
Religions, Ancient and Modern, Ancient Rome, Cyril Bailey, p. 86.
353
Religions, Ancient and Modern, Ancient Egypt, Professor Flinders-Petrie, p. 22.
354
Religions, Ancient and Modern, Ancient Egypt, Professor Flinders-Petrie, pp. 24, 26.
355
Vide article on Bania.
356
Dowson’s and Garrett’s Classical Dictionaries, art. Kartikeya.
357
Religion of the Semites, p. 265.
358
Ibidem, pp. 269, 270.
359
Religion of the Semites, pp. 270, 271.
360
Ibidem, pp. 273, 274.
361
Religion of the Semites, p. 289.
362
Ibidem, p. 313.
363
Religion of the Semites, p. 271.
364
Religion of the Semites, p. 275.
365
Golden Bough, ii. p. 321.
366
Vide art. Kumhār.
367
Religion of the Semites, p. 338.
368
Ibidem, p. 281.
369
Dr Jevons, Introduction to the History of Religion, p. 150.
370
Religion of the Semites, p. 285.
371
Orphéus, pp. 123, 125.
372
In following the explanation of the Passover given by Professor Robertson Smith and M. Reinach, it is necessary with great diffidence to dissent from the hypothesis of Sir J. G. Frazer that the lamb was a substitute for the previous sacrifice by the Israelites of their first-born sons.
373
Orphéus, p. 272; Religion of the Semites, p. 311.
374
Religion of the Semites, p. 304.
375
Ibidem, pp. 305, 306.
376
Religion of the Semites, pp. 296, 297.
377
Golden Bough, ii. p. 313.
378
When the blood of the animal was poured out before the god as his share.
379
Religion of the Semites, p. 246.
380
Vide article on Dhanwār.
381
Sir G. Robertson, Kāfirs of the Hindu Kush, pp. 450, 451.
382
Ibidem, p. 460.
383
Dalton, Ethnology of Bengal, p. 176.
384
Grant-Duff, History of the Marāthas, vol. i. p. 27. Mr. Hīra Lāl notes that owing to the predominance of Muhammadans in Berār the practice of slaughtering all animals by the method of halāl and the regular employment of the Mullah to pronounce the sacred text before slaughter may have grown up for their convenience. And, as in other instances, the Hindus may have simply imitated the Muhammadans in regarding this method of slaughter as necessary. This however scarcely seems to impair the force of the argument if the Hindus actually refused to eat animals not killed by halāl; they must in that case have attached some religious significance or virtue to the rite, and the most probable significance is perhaps that stated in the text. As Mr. Hīra Lāl points out, the Hindu sacred books provide an elaborate ritual for the sacrifice of animals, but this may have fallen into abeyance with the decline in the custom of eating meat.