Nothing & Dot. Reorganization of reason

Contemplation of images (“things’, objects, and situations) is a psychic phenomenon inherent in the alive “Entity”;

You may substitute the term “Entity” for “Monad” or “Soul” – especially when it comes to the activity of the “I” in the conditions of reality, but we will deliberately refrain in order to avoid misinterpretations (we will soon study this concept) – do not rush to call the cup the “Grail’;

Of course, we understand very well that this is happening to us right now and, looking at the diagram, we can clearly imagine how: “I” is in a kind of spacious internal bubble, i.e. “I Myself’ (from the position of each of us, now), as if bathing in reality;

Here & now, all of us, being in this audience, and in these very conditions of complete isolation from the supposed “external” – are discussing the structure of the contemplation mechanism, and we say: “The photon wave is reflected from the object and so on’, however, we are already being and discussing in these very conditions. And again, look around, we were originally here and at the beginning of the discussion;

Understanding practice (the task to be solved): Most often, the correct perception of the mechanism of contemplation must be controlled, otherwise it will end up on the list of incomprehensibles. The thing is that – a person does not apply the conclusions to what he is reasoning about. In this case – we talking about the mechanism of contemplation, not abstractly, but directly about how we see the environment and the situation, just right now. Then – we make a conclusion, but – we are unable to apply this result (conclusion) to what we were originally reasoning about. Please note the output used:

1. We are here (in the same room);

2. We begin to reason;

3. A photon is reflected from an object;

4. It affects an eye cell;

5. The cell initiates a signal to the brain;

6. The brain processes the signal;

7. “I” sees the result of the processing;

8. Everything that happened up to this point was not clear to us until we figured it out, that is, we cannot see the electrons themselves – they must be processed, transforming into ephemeral images;

9. Among other things – images cannot be understood until they are identified and realized.

Please note – we begin the reasoning not in order to separate it from the situation, but on the contrary – we are investigating perception of the situation, the mechanism of contemplation of objects works, now, in the current mode. In connection with this study, we found out that we see inside the “Consciousness’ – “I” sees this as a result of processing. So: we’ve a conclusion. It remains to understand that this conclusion cannot be separated from what we see now. We began to reason under one set of conditions and assumed that everything is outside, but it turned out that it is inside;

In the process of research we have found out that “we are inside Consciousness’ – we were here before. If we suddenly refuse to accept this reality – allow ourselves to deny the established fact, discarding conditions and begin to assert the opposite, then – following scientific, physical principles, we will again prove that we are in isolated space.

From all this follows the accompanying conclusion:

“Materialism is outliving itself at the systemic level” – although, this is not very useful knowledge, since perhaps we would not have found the “True Path’, than starting the reasoning from the materialistic position, or in other words – everything has a basis, including who we are now (there is no negative experience) and, among other things, we take into account that – “Everything Has Its Time”;

Let us also assume another – “reverse position’. Let us assume that initially we have such a Scheme of Nature: “We are in an isolated bubble – inside Consciousness, and have always known, and now know only about this.” Now look around, turn on awareness, then imagine everything. And? Is it reasonable to assume that the “World We Contemplate’ has a “Real Original’ located somewhere out there, outside, and even in some unknown to us, and absurd – “physical form’? Imagine as best you can, periodically practice imagining this device “supposed” by us. The result of this exercise may surprise you. If you are very attentive, you will soon smile from the funny – the wild Ancient Stereotype that has dominated Humanity since the Beginning of Time, and we are under Its influence;

It is known that any objects are contemplated according to the same principle. We are able not only to see, but also to identify, qualify, evaluate objects, to realize volume, color, mutual relativity, other parameters: size, distance, dynamics…

Thus, we “understand objects as located’, in space and occupying part of the volume. In addition, we note, judging by the conclusions, the main tools: identification, qualification, and analysis, of contemplated objects and situations, are used in thought processes, and provide comparison (matching).

These tools can be assumed to be separate from Reason, and quite independent, as we distinguish “Mind’, as a kind of mathematical co-processor, but they can also be built-in, i.e. formed, functions. This does not change anything fundamentally, does not affect anything, does not return us to the previous worldview;

Let us emphasize the possibility of developing all functions. Example: If similar but different quality objects often “appear’ in the field of vision, then their processing (i.e. identification and qualification), as specific experience is extracted, will be carried out, each time – faster and more accurately. This is how people learn to work on a sorting conveyor, achieve heights in this matter, and become “Narrow Specialists’;

We constantly use an amazing tool, and call it the “Interpreter’. Does it even exist?, or is it a normal function of Reason – acquired, like all the others? In discussing the mechanism of contemplation, you noticed that photons are converted by the eye cell into electrons – this is an extremely important point in the study, since objects are affected and used by conditions corresponding to the situation.

So, photons cannot be processed because they are “objects themselves’ – the wave of data related to the Nature of “Consciousness and Entity’ in their fundamental relativity. We suggest you take your time, examine all in order to sturdy and know it later. Next, we need to consider the Concept of Entity;

ENTITY

The Entity (here) is a logically defined, unique alive Monad, capable of manifesting a special intention – Actively Developing, as well as contributing to the Development of Its independent manifestations, which have their Own Will, are conceptually dependent and inseparable from It. The Monad (here) – we mean a completely ordinary concept, that is, it is the “Primary Being”, a Special Life Unit, Giving Origin to all living beings in the World (“multisoul’);

Usually , we often equate the concept of “Entity” with the concept of “Property " (mean something like “Essence’), or a complex of certain parameters (of a specific living being). Here, however, we put much more into the concept than can be expressed in words, and then we synthesize several concepts into one, combining them all:

{“God’+“Soul’+“Development’+“Life’+“World’+“Truth’}

There is also something more that we would like to say, but we cannot, running ahead of the content of research and reasoning, form an erroneous opinion, or, even more so, cause you to have an unpleasant “Hindsight Error” (pseudo phenomenon: “I knew it”, or “I already knew it”). Since in the state of cognition, you (together with us) will make a number of discoveries yourselves, which may turn out to be extremely interesting and useful. As a result, your Bright Ideas, born thanks to the knowledge acquired in this audience, will serve humanity in other sciences. However, the main thing that can happen is that you will find the answers to the questions posed (and specifically your questions), since this is what brought you here, and you will learn everything else in the process of research. —So, what awaits us in the end? … —Eternal Peace;

At this stage* of research, it is important to understand the isolated space, which is not limited and includes: The Whole World as a whole – all the conditions of actual infinity that we can imagine, the Universe, and us, and all living beings. But we are also able to understand that we realize only that which we contemplate, which we see “here and now”. Everything else, “around the corner”, i.e. Everything that we do not see at this moment – also exist, but only as a complex wave function. If you imagine everything except the function differently – it is worth staying, understanding in more detail, imagining each step in detail, and with the wave and the wave function – you will fully understand later, … in the process;

Look around again – feel “Consciousness” and this infinite sphere of your space in all directions; Reason consistently, and be sure to be unbiased (like it or not, study all the material for an adequate judgment). If you do not understand – read the research again. We suggest reasoning about “Consciousness” and everything connected with It (“we hope to dispel the shadow of many doubts’);

* * *

* By the end of this book, the attitude to the “subjects” of the research that we are considering here, as well as the attitude to the topic itself, especially to the set Goals, will change beyond recognition for everyone in this audience, because it is impossible to “recognize the unfamiliar’, something you have not encountered, but if cognition happens, it will be forever and irreversibly. We will begin to think (reflect) differently, and this is inevitable, therefore, if you do not want to change your attitude to your reality, or consider it threateningly dangerous, do not continue reading – close the book. Or, your mind will transform and form functions that are currently incomprehensible to you, and it will be absolutely impossible (!) to get rid of them after they have already been formed;

CONSCIOUSNESS

We are accustomed to judge about “It’ rather peculiarly, and always implied “Consciousness” by what was considered the internal functional activity of the brain – the processes occurring in it, sensory, psychic, but chemical in their physical nature. Many inquisitive people suspect that this is not quite as it was considered, and not very easy to understand due to its unusualness. But the Truth, which is already known, will not change from our attitude to It, and will not bend to individual oddities of character;

Fundamental laws do not care whether we know about them or not. But are not indifferent for us. We want to explore the World, study Ourselves, and study sciences, to develop in order to know! To look openly, to breathe freely, and to live with dignity of a Human – having thrown off the rusty shackles of senile remnants and stereotypes. Otherwise, for a long time we will not be able to understand – What are We really capable of?

For the realization of volumetric (“3D”) objects, a corresponding space (i.e. place) is necessary, otherwise it cannot be realized… even in the virtual World; Let us assume that “Consciousness” provides for the “I” the realization of three-dimensional space and objects located in its volume. Why exactly does “Consciousness” provide the realization of space? And why is this realized “for I”, and not just like that – without reason?

Let us first answer the second question: We have not yet tried to prove the presence of other people in the “Isolated Area of Consciousness”, and it is unlikely to be very simple, because space is realized individually (– complete isolation). We will study this a little later, but at this stage we can only assert that Objects and space are realized only for a  specific “I”;

About of the first question, regarding the source of realization, it should be taken into account that the “I” is active and cannot be passive, that is, in relation to “Consciousness”, the “I” has opposite properties, otherwise it would contradict the balance of the necessary relativity of the being of the “I”.

As a result of what is known, “Consciousness” is static. We recognize only “I” and “Consciousness” as primary, this means that the active “I” initiates the realization of objects and space through “Consciousness”, that is, it uses “Its” functional capabilities. With its intention, “I” leads “Consciousness” to “Active Realization”. All this is too simple, however, when we get confused, we encounter difficulties that we ourselves have invented, but without any basis. Everyone knows that many people elevate the realization of reality to a supernatural creation (magic, sorcery), but everything has an explanation, logic and basis – Everything happens due to development, i.e. natural rational change – through the acquisition of experience of the active “I”, or when applying the experience that is already there, but with the same purpose – Development;

The same becomes known in connection with life practice – the “I” is active and uses any available tools, and is interested in development – shows interest in “things” and situations. This is not an unfounded statement – when studying the “I”, we take into account obvious facts, that is, our own properties and characteristics. When knowing Ourselves, it is necessary to identify the “I” being studied = Ourselves (I Am). We know that in order to carry out the Act of self-authenticity, the “I” uses reason, but Reason becomes available when the “I” influences Consciousness, and Is the Product of this relativity;

There are also very important facts and conclusions related to the development of Reason and its functions, but now this is not the time, we will definitely return to this later;

Any Being has relativity, which can be spatial – when the “interdependent arrangement of objects relative to each other’ is implied and used, but relativity can also be inherent – ensuring the “Harmony of the World’ in maintaining the Balance of Opposites, that is, what we usually call the Internal Energy Balance. Also in the properties of elemental compounds, and in the essence of important astrophysical Laws – the violation of this Balance is “strictly unacceptable’;

* * *

It is probably sometimes useful and necessary to look ahead, to grasp the “still unfamiliar’, for the subsequent realization of a more “Prepared and Justified Reality’. When the topic is extremely complex, all the contributing methods and opportunities should be used for better understanding, especially if it concerns worldview convictions and/or involves contradictions to persistent stereotypes;

For proper preparation, we will give the usual relations: Cold/Hot, Near/Far, +/-, Heavy/Light, Reasonable/Unreasonable, and concerning our reasoning, the very important Fundamental relation [“I” | “Consciousness”].

For a complete and deep awareness, the actual, that is, the “Full Being of the ‘I’”, we recommend that you study, realize, and take into account the following most important relations:

[“Abstract Being of the Global ‘I’”, and |

“Being of the Global ‘I’ in the Conditions of Reality”];

Although is not yet timely, it is necessary to keep in mind:

– We represent the “I” abstractly, i.e. the “One I” literally the General, which is each individual “Real aspect of the Entity” in reality – that is, it is present as the “Global aspect of the I” – nowhere specifically everywhere at the same time (It Is).

As an abstract – “One Self (“I”)” is absolutely static and therefore is inherent in a wave nature, however, “Global aspect of the Entity” = “One Self (“I”)”, or = “Global aspect of the Self (“I”)”, necessarily has a balance – a Systemic opposite “Real aspect of the Global Self (“I”)” – One and unique Only Fundamental Systemically Necessary Alive Being in the World, having access to the entire volume of experience and data. “The Global Aspect of the Entity in Reality” – He! Has unlimited possibilities – a potential equal to the sum of the potentials of all living beings in the World. Equivalent of the entire World. He, Incomprehensible. Eternal;

– We also imagine the “I” in reality – as the usual, familiar to us – “I” in the body”, active, independent, manifesting will and intention, comprehending experience, that is, a living being in a body inherent to the nature of particles, and being in the conditions of reality. The “I” itself is the “Spark of Life”, that is, an infinitely small part of the Soul <“One I”> – “Global aspect of the Entity”. But, each “Real aspect of the Entity”, from the position of the “Real aspect of the Global I”, is defined as “Not I” (– which, however, is quite natural);

The duality of the “I” is confirmed by the Corpuscular-Wave Dualism, and indicates Its connection with any dimensions. It is important that the Nature of particles is Reality, and in the absence of  dynamics – a Static Wave (all this is very important further, we will return to this more than once);

Considering the fact of contemplating mental images that are not located in the “Space with Explicit Realization”, we can assert that the current “Explicit Space” is not the only one. Objects contemplated mentally, as if “once again inside’  – also three-dimensional, and are also located in space, but in some other one. However, in any case, we realize and “realize Ourselves’ in the “frame of explicit current reality”, and precisely in such conditions in which the use of Reason is possible – thinking, observation, analysis of the situation, we will include in the list meditative states, astral space, the state of sleep, hypnotic conditions, etc.

All this confirms our conclusion that it is “Consciousness’ that realizes a potentially unlimited number of necessary spaces – for the specific needs of the “I”, in this case for the realization of three-dimensional objects, but we do not doubt our ability to extract experience using higher-order dimensions (– any degree of dimensionality, if this turns out to be available). However, now we assert only the most obvious fact:

Space is not “Consciousness”;

This is a very important (for us) postulate, it will be useful not only in this study, but also in the life of someone who likes life :). Formulations and short theses that have a special meaning move us towards answers to the questions posed here; Considering that we can close our eyes – refusing to contemplate the situation, or deliberately fall asleep, of our own free will – ceasing the realization of reality, the question arises: Can the “I” be Self-sufficient?

A positive answer to this question, in the ideal conditions of existence established by us, would indicate the complete irrelevance of the “I”, which contradicts everything absolutely, that is, it is illogical and impossible, for a number of natural reasons. However, if “Any ideas, feelings, thoughts, data of memory, and anything contemplated, can exist exclusively in ‘Consciousness’, in the form which we consider actual and valid, then irrelevance implies the ‘One ‘I’’, and not in some Emptiness of the World, but namely as ‘There is only ‘I’’, including everything conceivable and inconceivable, together with Emptiness, if we admit that It is possible at all”. This means that “Consciousness” is inside the “I”, but has a direct relativity to the “I”. Also, in particular, that is – from the position of each living being in the World – this is so – taking into account all the facts about which we reasoned before;

Can it be proven that this is not so? (by disproving Solipsism)

We have found out before, we know, and have already said it many times, that we see everything we contemplate only in “Consciousness” (“I” see in Consciousness) and from the current position, “Consciousness”, as the Cause (processor, mean handler?), is around, and precisely outside. When “Consciousness” is around – this means that “I” is in the center of the current space (“within the frame”), extracts experience acting in its own body in the conditions of reality, represents Itself in this form (body);

Consciousness inside means what we point to when we discuss the mechanism of contemplation [from a photon, through a signal, etc.] and call it “the handler inside the Self” and then about “I”, but again inside, which contemplates “This same thing”, already as a result of processing and again – “Consciousness” turned out to be inside, this is what we focused on and discuss. You will say: – It looks like a trick. – The reaction is understandable, but let us maintain attention. Let us explain (even if it is early) that the cyclicity “to inside, inside, and inside,…” is due to the four-dimensionality, but the ambiguity arises due to the Duality of the “I”;

However, everything is solved quite simply: reasoning – we say that we are immersed inside, and to the “I”, but, at the same time, we are always inside the “Consciousness”. This is tracked very simply – any situation can be realized only in the corresponding space, in the “Consciousness” and by means of “It”. “I” acts as an active trigger and initiator, in the conditions of reality = in space, and realizing this space in the same time;

Consciousness is always outside (a priori, and in any case);

However, we would like to find a simpler scheme (concept) – in the hope of offering you more transparent examples, and to cite them as evidence as a consequence of other, more understandable, conclusions. Therefore, for now we will only assert the following – anything, anything, is and can exist only relatively. This has a special meaning. Let us recall the Harmony of the World (inner Balance). In connection with the established absolute impossibility of the unrelated existence of the “I”, an important conclusion follows:

“I” exists relative with (-to) “Consciousness”;

According to the Fact of Being and the Act of Self-Validity – “I” is the Active aspect. From the position of any person – this is the Fact of Being “I” and “My life Activity” in this regard. “Consciousness” always seems static, and provides “I” with the opportunity to manifest Activity. This harmonious relationship is the fundamental basis – the mutual relativity of [“I” | and “Consciousness”] (also in accordance with the inherent relativity, this is a balance: Static | and Dynamic), which represents a Single two-aspect Entity:

[“Global aspect of the Entity” | and “Real aspect Entity”];

All this reliably proves that “Consciousness” is outside of everything Existing, and “I” – manifests “Its Activity” being inside the Static “Consciousness”. When trying to reason about this in relation to the “Global aspect of the Essence” to “Consciousness”, then Its position is abstract, and is everywhere, but “Consciousness” in any case is outside of all;

We also ask that you take into account the fact that we are researching, although we think and are accustomed to conditions that literally do not correspond to what we are discussing here, therefore we sometimes have to, to tell the truth, be creative, consider the static in sequential dynamics, which in fact can be dynamic and static at the same time, and we include the Two-Aspect “I” among such “things”.

When we attribute everything static to the nature of Consciousness, we should take into account that Consciousness realizes Spaces that are static by definition, but the content located in them is contemplated as dynamic. On the other hand, any content is only contemplated as dynamic, showing the static state of the object at each point of the wave of its dynamic state, successively one after another (a paradoxical fact). This is not a factual dynamic, but in practice (and in experience!) it is contemplated and taken into account exactly this way, and not otherwise. The visible three-dimensionality is also doubtful, which in fact is two-dimensional images, and three-dimensionality, in their relationship, is only understood and realized, but we not seen, otherwise would see one side of the cube more, additionally, and could see what is “behind the high fence” :). So, we got one more very interesting postulate: