A statesman who doesn’t exist yet. Remid

GLOSSARY:

Zerefs are community people whose behavior conforms to stringent standards. Taboo, morality, law. Their reflection is zero; therefore, their reflexes are rigidly set by the community, authorities, and law.

Remids are people of honor. Their reflection is average, and they are a conditional elite and conditional authority directing the members of the community – the Zerefs.

Refags represent the highest form of reflection, that of tradespeople. Selfish reflection is aimed at making a profit from underdeveloped or traditional people.

CHAPTER V

HUMBLE HYPOCRITE

Against loop of Remids.

The loop of Remids is struggled the Remids between themselves, after what ahead, as an option in power it turns out Zeref, a wild and strong-willed man. Out of pride, the best people, aristocrats, and intellectuals agree to let the fool go ahead of all the aristocrats so as not to regret it. And forward, they pass a sick or unhappy plebeian. This is a dispute between equals.

After Lenin’s death.

Does this mean that if the power is lying on the road or a real candidate is experiencing difficulties, a less talented one will pick it up? For example, what happened to the Bolsheviks after Lenin’s death?

For example, we take the attempt of Zinoviev, the Chairman of the Petrosovet, a member of the Politburo and Central Committee, and Kamenev, the Chairman of the Mossovet and head of the STO, to push aside the most talented in the Central Committee Trotsky, the Minister of war. After all, both knew that they would not pull responsibility and that their talents were lower than the LDT. Further, the party apparatus supported even more inconspicuous and mediocre Stalin. In 1936, Stalin executed Kamenev and Zinoviev – the logical conclusion of the Remid’s loop, when the most gifted come forward in the struggle of the most untalented. Then the most incompetent destroy them.

After Stalin’s death.

Beria was the most influential of the Soviet elite. But Malenkov and Khrushchev united against him, supported by Marshal Zhukov. Beria was shot. Malenkov was sure that the post of Chairman of the Council of Ministers was the main one (it was held once in the past by Lenin and Stalin). He recommended Stalin’s buffoon Khrushchev to lead the party. But he was very wrong. Who led the party, he has taken all.

Further.

It is unlikely that Khrushchev was the most talented, and the Remid’s loop here looks more like a Remids farce because all the participants are Zeremids and provincials (all were born in the villages and rose in official ranks thanks to the revolution of 1917 and the counter-revolution of 1937 by Stalin). In 1957, Stalin’s associates Molotov, Kaganovich, and Malenkov had already decided to remove Khrushchev. The most talented Bureau of the Presidium Bureau of the Central Committee, Marshal Zhukov said: “I will appeal to the people, the people will support me!” (to crush you – Molotov, Kaganovich, Malenkov). For these words, four months later, Zhukov was accused of Bonapartism and dismissed as Minister of defense of the USSR.

The farce of choice.

When Khrushchev was dismissed, no one wanted to come out on top. Everyone was afraid of Khrushchev’s reprisal. However, when the support of the security forces was guaranteed, the hardware people agreed on the ridiculous figure of Brezhnev, who in the midst of Khrushchev’s struggle with Molotov, Kaganovich, and Malenkov fainted at a meeting of the Bureau (almost like the elderly cardinal Jacques Dues, who was elected Pope in the hope that he would die immediately after the election. Dues during the Conclave portrayed himself all the time sick and dying at the Council of Cardinals, and they bought into this trick).

Finally, after the death of Andropov, 73-year-old Konstantin Chernenko was elected to the post of General Secretary and head of the USSR, “a diligent performer”, “never eager for power”, who from the very beginning of the Supreme Board was taken from his hospital bed, changed clothes and asked to read the prepared text. Isn’t this clear evidence of degradation and negative selection?!

Youth, not talent.

The most important argument when choosing the new leader of the USSR Gorbachev was not talent but only youth. Mikhail Gorbachev- the last leader of the USSR, is the son of a combined harvester. So much for the dictatorship of the proletariat! Where the most important thing was to be born somewhere in Siberia in the family of some slaughterer, locksmith, or village blacksmith. As we can see, the slogan of the dictatorship of the proletariat turned into a meme where the best was chosen from the worst. They chose from the majority of those who were more numerous in the country.

What are the conclusions?

The Remid’s loop is a struggle of the elite and the self-destruction of the best rulers as the result of “bad parenting”, hoping for the best, using the weakness of most worthy by reason of mandatory their modesty. If the most worthy is not modest (for example, Trotsky), they will immediately begin to displace him, reproach him and finally completely exclude him from the list of candidates.

Further, this selection does not end. For, in fact, it’s all the faults of tradition. It begins with modesty and ends with a majority vote. Those who are physically more are the ones who decide. And were physically more proletariat people were in the USSR? No. All these people were born in traditional families. Choosing not the kindest leader, but the worst for leadership but modest and not hurting the self-esteem of electors begins in the family. Do you remember the saying about a quiet heifer that sucks two cows?

Within families.

What kind of child do parents love? Who the sickest, weakest, most needy. Surprisingly, this family phenomenon of love, almost traditional, goes from the bottom to the top-in the apparatus of the party and government, where they also love the weakest and sickest (remember the physically ill and infirm Leonid Brezhnev and Konstantin Chernenko, who were “loved” by the people).

How is this Remid’s loop, which is actually an echo of tradition, overcome?

Of course, by choice of the leader of a worthy replacement. If the leader himself does not choose the best of his entourage, then the traditional people will choose the worst,” modest” hypocrite through their elite.

CHAPTER VI

NEGATIVE SELECTION

There is an opinion that under the autocracy and dictatorship of the party, the people do not decide anything.

Is this true?

This is an incorrect superficial opinion. And the very first question – where did this government and the autocrat come from? Well, they did not fall from the sky to this point of the earth, where the autocrat rules with his people. Not from the clouds, not from the moon.

These people are derivatives of popular choice, which does not happen officially, that is, directly, so that everyone can see how it happens in hypocritical democratic elections. This is an intimate, family choice, a choice made by every head of the family and his wife and children. No one tells your father at home, I voted for you, I chose you. I love the respect of outsiders who don’t like unnecessary shouting. This is a cultural choice, a voluntary choice. We don’t choose our parents. If we chose as required by liberal guidelines’ humanity would have been suppressed even before biblical times. We choose objectively, and we choose by attraction.

But in one case, it’s good when it happens in the family. But how is it that on the street or in any public place, we dislike our ruler? We love our father selflessly and selflessly if, of course, he deserves it. Even if it doesn’t deserve it, the tradition and culture of the people oblige us to show respect, even the most incompetent and clueless father. We must respect the elderly. This is how our ancestors lived, and this is how we live.

But official people stretch the poster. It says,” Glory to the father of the nation!” Do they really love him or is the expression of love mandatory, like wearing a tie for officials? Whether they love their patron and father or not, this is the culture. If they show their independence and independence, the system will expel them as a volcano expels ash from a crater. That’s how parents dislike too independent and obstinate sons. That’s how society dislikes dubious individuals.

Any person who claims power must show that he is subject to society. Moreover, he must lull the vigilance and selfishness of everyone. Hence, the general dislike of so-called personalities, or more precisely, dislike of talents. A gifted person has not yet done anything, and a rumor is already being created around him that he is an enemy of the people, that he is an enemy of the state, even an enemy of the father. Just as ugly women hate beauty with all their hearts, traditional people suspect that they steal love. Zerefs, Zeremids, even Remids, because of the competition for the breast of the cow, will do anything to “parents” only saw their loving faces. This is how loyalty and the desire to please come out in front of the traditional people. Negative selection begins.

CHAPTER VII

THE MAIN THING FOR THE TRADITION IS TO TAKE POWER

“I don’t like it when people kill, but if the masses hate someone so much that their anger can’t be contained, we won’t stop them… The people’s militia should be on the side of the red guards, unite with them, sympathize with them, inform them…”

Xie Fuji, Minister of public security of the people’s Republic of China, 1966

So, the first rule is to take power. Let it lie on the road, and it often happens. Let the thorns heading to power, who takes power, he can rule happily for a long time. All traditional peoples in history have worshiped power, obediently followed its orders, and even deified it. The main thing is to take power—the power of the divine. The traditional people themselves are blind here. They recognize the power of any God. This, by the way, is often used even today. Suppose the ruler will decide to temporarily appoint someone in his place and then may return to the previous place again through democratic elections. Such a castling at the top is impossible for everyone, namely for traditional people who believe in the authorities. They stand and are silent in any case. Not to say that they believe blindly, but this is the culture of trusting the authorities. After all, all power is from God! This is what the church claims and refers to the Bible.

Does this mean that the leaders of the main Soviet communes, Kamenev and Zinoviev and Trotsky’s rivals, were counting on this effect? They thought so, and we will take power, and then the people recognize us as Lenin’s successors. By the way, a relatively good option for the USSR. In any case, it presupposes the return of interparty democracy. In this case, it is not difficult for a real intellectual to regain power. Here it was necessary to cancel the decision of the X Congress of the CPSU in 1921 on the need to strengthen discipline and prohibit internal party discussions – this decision will then depend on the people of Stalin to deal with opponents. But when this decision was made, there was a civil war. (But the Zeremids war is eternal, even if it literally does not exist, the Zeremids always have it, even in their sleep and hibernation)

Zinoviev and Kamenev- Remids, a great alternative!

With the Remids, the USSR had good prospects. The most important thing is abolishing the practice of “go-go”, when you give results at any cost – the command and administrative leadership style would be discarded. Remids are a creative beginning and the same approach to each problem. And Remids are always creative, the assumption of criticism and intellectual reflection about their mistakes (Zeremid has no reflection, only complexes). Remids criticize each other but support each other and try to correct themselves if they delve into their mistakes. Remids are principled, and there is no one more principled than these people, but exclusively and only for the law and for a high goal. Remids are the best representatives of the enforcement apparatus-the state. And it would be better if they forced others by their example, especially the officials, by not stealing. And especially, the Remids do not harass each other physically, except for disagreements, except on the level of faith. The Remid’s faith is the state itself. And the language of executions is not their language of communication. The language of persuasion, service to the people, is their style. Before it did nobles, officers-people of honor, that’s the same Remids but with a pedigree and a shoulder strap. When there are no other solutions, Remids will try to agree and make a final attempt at reconciliation. Another thing resolutely and excitable Zeref, who always speaks dramatically, as in nature, as in hunting, the Zeref quickly defines: a friend is a friend, the enemy is the enemy at mid is nothing. Only instincts. They invented the enemies of the people, hence making the bullets for enemies of the people, like arrows. If such a person is given free rein, it will begin to search for its way.

First, in this search, it will find them guilty. That is, it will find its enemies. And not the fact that the enemy will not be a countryman, neighbor, or yesterday’s schoolmate. The most recent enemies will go, father, brother, and other native “trifles”. But to excite people’s finger pointing to the top of admiration must rise, again, of seemed. As soon as he is faced with the first problem, he will turn on his people’s brains and call on the people to help him in the fight against personal enemies without any “creativity” and reflection of doubt. For Zeremids, there is no such doubt, no reflection; he is concerned only with complexes. In this sense, the crowd is also often covered by religion, tradition, even patriotism, but it keeps the secret of the inner itch and complexes of internal self-contempt. But, once again, they choose those who are physically larger, intellectually lower, and less cultured. They selected not the bespectacled Trotsky, but Stalin. But whoever is responsible will not necessarily be the real enemy. He will look more like a victim, reminding you with all his pathetic appearance that he is the victim of blind, angry people.

CHAPTER VIII

CRUEL CHAMELEON NEAR AND INSIDE

There may be an opinion that the traditional system is omnivorous and capable of implantation. This is true. It is capable of implantation. It is like a chameleon taking the right shape. But inside, it remains the same traditional system. In other words, traditional people cannot live without hierarchy. Whatever system the Zerefs create and whatever they call it, they will still create a hierarchy where there will be a commanding elite and despicable subordinates. They can't do without it. It is very difficult to explain what this is related to. Maybe with the climate, something else accompanies the heaviest conditions of life, which necessarily needs a leader and his people to discipline the community. But traditional people wherever they gather and wherever they move intoxicated of need, hunger, in a new place they will again live as before, and nothing will change. It has already been said that there is an invisible central spine all the time, and all the other circles are strung on it. You can live under a natural product exchange relationship, consume under capitalism, learn under socialism, and even under democracy, and this central core will stand here and there. But no one sees it. However, everyone inside will be fine. The high priests will be painted in the colors of the elite, and the rest will stand in rank as if they are about to rush into battle again right now.

It’s all about what the next quality will be central. If under feudalism it is the gentility and subordination of the nobility by blood, under socialism the ability to remember and adopt words and slogans from revolutionaries then under capitalism, when in general the traditional people do not know the meaning of money all Zerefs will start speculating. Yes, so that they will overtake their teachers in rigidity and cynicism. Authoritative capitalists will be surprised, and revolutionaries will turn over in their coffins. Why do these people have so much rigidity towards their own, namely their own people? And when we’re traditional, crypto-traditional, and post-traditional people sensitive to each other? In the family group, the relatives will see everything and not allow it: they will punish for callousness, non-participation, and disrespect. That is, there are witnesses nearby. The traditional person was always visible in front of the community. Under feudalism, Zeref must observe the norms of community morality. Under socialism, morality tripled by slogans generally put more pressure on Zeref than the pressure of relatives. Under capitalism, this triple pressure has disappeared. Triple! It immediately cut off —it means that is time to build a new hierarchy. And who of the same people will move just like that? Why give way to others? Will he want to stand at the bottom and train his eyes on the forehead? From above, there is always pressure and violence, scolding – in fact, everything is the same traditional, without the sentimentality of civilization. From below, execution and sensitivity with eyes on the forehead. Hence, the cruelty of banks and large percentages of bankers – these instances or other forms that are traditional substances in themselves. Who is sitting in banks? – Zerefs. That is, their own people. And we know that Zerefs needs to rise quickly, if not already risen, that is the same traditional people. And traditional people always just push. On their kind, the same people, but unfortunately lower status. If in the natural era there were all sorts of heroes, warriors, now in the realm of money, these heroes and warriors are the cruelest, heartless speculators. They don’t see relatives and don’t look for any kinship. They just push and belittle. Discipline is the name of discipline. This is the law of survival. So, it was, and so it remains.

Where it go?

All the people are scattered in the cities. But what kind of people are they? What do they profess? What values are recognized? How quickly and clearly do they imitate other people's forms but immediately remain themselves?

Let’s look at the ranks of officials and see that the ranks of the chosen were not recruited for professionalism. We will definitely indicate that this is a traditional group of pseudo – warriors. They are not well adapted for real combat conflicts, so they have a very strange appearance, but for privatization, for example, this type and, most importantly, the quality of candidates will be optimal. We never forget that the core of the tradition is already at the very center, and circles are strung on it one after another, one on top of the other. The right people in the system are only required to remain silent and run errands, just like in war. On the other hand, each chief executive will choose the same silent relative – the same necessary anachronism of tradition, at the very end, it is just as suitable as at the very top, only at the top while the form is observed and at the bottom immediately there is no form. At the bottom everything is simple: if you can’t cope, if you don’t arrange it, go for a walk. Thus, the entire market system is created on the traditional (military, paramilitary, crypto-military) basis, and there is no place for others, alien, dangerous, and incomprehensible in this system. Although this is no longer a system of primitive warriors, it is already a system, a socio-economic formation even such a state consists only of a form. The institutions of the state seem to exist, but the content is old, feudal.

How was it overcome a little so that each chief executive did not choose his shadow?

Under socialism, there was, of course, rotation, so that one officer did not create a circle of "friends". In fact, under capitalism, this problem of acquaintances is solved by the same change of leaders, only having time to mix them. But all of them were selected for privatization and distribution of benefits. That is, they are not relatives, people are not really relatives, they are a kind of relatives, they are almost a medieval order. And do not forget for a minute about the central spine. A stranger, a man from the street, is not allowed in such an order. Yes, to such an extent that they immediately have time to agree. But in general, the hierarchy has already been established. It lived here. But in culture. And people of a select circle are extremely reluctant to choose their assistants from nowhere, unverified, but still, there are elevators.

What kind of abilities do you need to have to please the new elite?

It seems that the capitalists always talks about a new round of mimicry – about democracy. But there is still the same traditional something, where there is no criticism discipline, and few people can say bad things about power. After all, if they start talking about it, about democracy, about rights, these next ambitious people, the faster the whole system with the center and circles will fall apart. But why would it fall apart? To gather again on the same prohibitions and respect for the elders (by position). There is no doubt that such a system will come together again. And the more people talk about their commitment to the old, to the precepts of their ancestors, and similar folklore, the sooner this old structure will gather, despite the new fashion, however. After all, traditional people, although they look like adherents of the old and talk about precepts in fact, at the same time are the most ridiculous but zealous imitators of world fashion. Because to create a primitive hierarchy (by blood), you need to go through all the circles of rebirth back with the search for these same people of famous blood. It always sounds beautiful in words. In fact, the people of the past ruined nobles went through many battles to subdue the same freedom-loving Zerefs of the past. And under capitalism, the set also occurred, and many received the joy of large, no matter how received the money. After all, the goal is everything, and the means are nothing. This law sounds invisible sounds, creating new circles around the central spine (the core of hierarchy). Whatever you build, I will, “this rod says. Whatever you talk about at feasts, corporate parties, hangouts, or just because of swagger and bragging, about the great past or bright present, next to you the same I – your core, your culture.

P.S.

By the way, modern geopolitics is based on this dual hypocrisy and fanaticism at the same time. The Western world supports the democracy of archaic peoples. Archaic peoples will inevitably create an old primitive society, not a democracy, because they will always rely on covenants when any dispute arises. And they will return to the old road of the ancestors, with a full turn back, they will destroy all the buildings of civilization.

CHAPTER IX

OLD WIFE’S FEARS. OR WHY TRADITIONAL SOCIETY IS MEDIOCRE

Everyone knows that in traditional society, there are eternal difficulties with rotation. Everyone knows, but they can't do anything. They can't do it, and they want to avoid doing anything. This is such a phenomenon, the consciousness awakened by someone from the outside wakes up, can be a writer, analyst, journalist, and the traditional person still sleeps and sleeps. Or they are pretending to. Usually, rotation is understood as the supreme power or tip. In modern political terms, a leader or a political leader does not want to leave. He does not want to leave and even says that he does not see his replacement. This scene is bound to happen. There is no one to put. Who will put after? In general, there is no replacement, anyway. Everyone is waiting, as in the story of Khoja Nasreddin about his Emir and the talking donkey, who will be the first to die.

This phenomenon of the unwillingness of the entire upper layer to resign voluntarily for health reasons or incompetence seems to have been discovered not only by me. In a hierarchical society, as soon as a dignitary, official, or authorized person goes into the shadows, everyone immediately ceases to notice him, even relatives, who still show signs of respect out of habit. There is a shocking change in people. The attitude of the entire surrounding world of traditional people towards the retiree is changing in a bad way. No way! The ruler or even just an official says to himself when he sees such a change of mood. Let me die at my desk and be carried out of the office feet first. I prefer not to be disappointed in my people. I love them so much, and they love me. Even if they love me hypocritically, I am not ready for complete oblivion. And no one is ready. That's why no one really wants to rotate. Everyone wants any kind of love, even hypocritical one's own or someone else's, but love, honor, and self-deception respect.