
Полная версия
Men and Women
JOHANNES AGRICOLA IN MEDITATION
1842There's heaven above, and night by nightI look right through its gorgeous roof;No suns and moons though e'er so brightAvail to stop me; splendor-proofI keep the broods of stars aloof:For I intend to get to God,For 't is to God I speed so fast,For in God's breast, my own abode,Those shoals of dazzling glory, passed,I lay my spirit down at last.I lie where I have always lain,God smiles as he has always smiled;Ere suns and moons could wax and wane,Ere stars were thundergirt, or piledThe heavens, God thought on me his child;Ordained a life for me, arrayedIts circumstances every oneTo the minutest; ay, God saidThis head this hand should rest uponThus, ere he fashioned star or sun.And having thus created me,Thus rooted me, he bade me grow,Guiltless forever, like a treeThat buds and blooms, nor seeks to knowThe law by which it prospers so:But sure that thought and word and deedAll go to swell his love for me,Me, made because that love had needOf something irreversiblyPledged solely its content to be.Yes, yes, a tree which must ascend,No poison-gourd foredoomed to stoop!I have God's warrant, could I blendAll hideous sins, as in a cup,To drink the mingled venoms up;Secure my nature will convertThe draught to blossoming gladness fast:While sweet dews turn to the gourd's hurt,And bloat, and while they bloat it, blast,As from the first its lot was cast.For as I lie, smiled on, full-fedBy unexhausted power to bless,I gaze below on hell's fierce bed,And those its waves of flame oppress,Swarming in ghastly wretchedness;Whose life on earth aspired to beOne altar-smoke, so pure!—to winIf not love like God's love for me,At least to keep his anger in;And all their striving turned to sin.Priest, doctor, hermit, monk grown whiteWith prayer, the broken-hearted nun,The martyr, the wan acolyte,The incense-swinging child—undoneBefore God fashioned star or sun!God, whom I praise; how could I praise,If such as I might understand,Make out and reckon on his ways,And bargain for his love, and stand,Paying a price, at his right hand?NOTES"Johannes Agricola in Meditation" presents the doctrine of predestination as it appears to a devout and poetic soul whose conviction of the truth of such a doctrine has the strength of a divine revelation. Those elected for God's love can do nothing to weaken it, those not elected can do nothing to gain it, but it is not his to reason why; indeed, he could not praise a god whose ways he could understand or for whose love he had to bargain.
Johannes Agricola: (1492-1566), Luther's secretary, 1519, afterward in conflict with him, and author of the doctrine called by Luther antinomian, because it rejected the Law of the Old Testament as of no use under the Gospel dispensation. In a note accompanying the first publication of this poem, Browning quotes from "The Dictionary of All Religions" (1704): "They say that good works do not further, nor evil works hinder salvation; that the child of God cannot sin, that God never chastiseth him, that murder, drunkenness, etc., are sins in the wicked but not in him, that the child of grace being once assured of salvation, afterwards never doubteth . . . that God doth not love any man for his holiness, that sanctification is no evidence of justification." Though many antinomians taught thus, says George Willis Cooke in his "Browning Guide Book," it does not correctly represent the position of Agricola, who in reality held moral obligations to be incumbent upon the Christian, but for guidance in these he found in the New Testament all the principles and motives necessary.
PICTOR IGNOTUS
FLORENCE, 15-1845I could have painted pictures like that youth'sYe praise so. How my soul springs up! No barStayed me—ah, thought which saddens while it soothes!—Never did fate forbid me, star by star,To outburst on your night with all my giftOf fires from God: nor would my flesh have shrunkFrom seconding my soul, with eyes upliftAnd wide to heaven, or, straight like thunder, sunkTo the centre, of an instant; or aroundTurned calmly and inquisitive, to scanThe license and the limit, space and bound,Allowed to truth made visible in man.And, like that youth ye praise so, all I saw,Over the canvas could my hand have flung,Each face obedient to its passion's law,Each passion clear proclaimed without a tongue;Whether Hope rose at once in all the blood,A-tiptoe for the blessing of embrace,Or Rapture drooped the eyes, as when her broodPull down the nesting dove's heart to its place;Or Confidence lit swift the forehead up,And locked the mouth fast, like a castle braved—0 human faces, hath it spilt, my cup?What did ye give me that I have not saved?Nor will I say I have not dreamed (how well!)Of going—I, in each new picture—forth,As, making new hearts beat and bosoms swell,To Pope or Kaiser, East, West, South, or North,Bound for the calmly-satisfied great State,Or glad aspiring little burgh, it went,Flowers cast upon the car which bore the freight,Through old streets named afresh from the event,Till it reached home, where learned age should greetMy face, and youth, the star not yet distinctAbove his hair, lie learning at my feet!—Oh, thus to live, I and my picture, linkedWith love about, and praise, till life should end,And then not go to heaven, but linger here,Here on my earth, earth's every man my friend—The thought grew frightful, 't was so wildly dear!But a voice changed it. Glimpses of such sightsHave scared me, like the revels through a doorOf some strange house of idols at its rites!This world seemed not the world it was before:Mixed with my loving trusting ones, there trooped. . . Who summoned those cold faces that begunTo press on me and judge me? Though I stoopedShrinking, as from the soldiery a nun,They drew me forth, and spite of me . . . enough!These buy and sell our pictures, take and give,Count them for garniture and household-stuff,And where they live needs must our pictures liveAnd see their faces, listen to their prate,Partakers of their daily pettiness,Discussed of—"This I love, or this I hate,This likes me more, and this affects me less!"Wherefore I chose my portion. If at whilesMy heart sinks, as monotonous I paintThese endless cloisters and eternal aislesWith the same series. Virgin, Babe and Saint,With the same cold calm beautiful regard—At least no merchant traffics in my heart;The sanctuary's gloom at least shall wardVain tongues from where my pictures stand apart;Only prayer breaks the silence of the shrineWhile, blackening in the daily candle-smoke,They moulder on the damp wall's travertine17,'Mid echoes the light footstep never woke.So, die my pictures! surely, gently die!O youth, men praise so—holds their praise its worth?Blown harshly, keeps the trump its golden cry?Tastes sweet the water with such specks of earth?NOTES"Pictor Ignotus" is a reverie characteristic of a monastic painter of the Renaissance who recognizes, in the genius of a youth whose pictures are praised, a gift akin to his own, but which he has never so exercised, spite of the joy such free human expression and recognition of his power would have given him, because he could not bear to submit his art to worldly contact. So he has chosen to sink his name in unknown service to the Church, and to devote his fancy to pure and beautiful but cold and monotonous repetitions of sacred themes. His gentle regret that his own pictures will moulder unvisited is half wonderment that the youth can endure the sullying of his work by secular fame.
FRA LIPPO LIPPI
1855I am poor brother Lippo, by your leave!You need not clap your torches to my face.Zooks, what's to blame? you think you see a monk!What, 'tis past midnight, and you go the rounds,And here you catch me at an alley's endWhere sportive ladies leave their doors ajar?The Carmine's18 my cloister: hunt it up,Do—harry out, if you must show your zeal,Whatever rat, there, haps on his wrong hole,And nip each softling of a wee white mouse,"Fra Lippo Lippi" is a dramatic monologue which incidentally conveys the whole story of the occurrence the poem starts from—the seizure of Fra Lippo by the City Guards, past midnight, in an equivocal neighborhood—and the lively talk that arose thereupon, outlines the character and past life of the Florentine artist-monk (1412-1469) and the subordinate personalities of the group of officers; and makes all this contribute towards the presentation of Fra Lippo as a type of the more realistic and secular artist of the Renaissance who valued flesh, and protested against the ascetic spirit which strove to isolate the soul.