Kazakhs and Turks

Since the 6th century, the displacement of the Iranian root from the entire steppe and its replacement with the Turkic one began. No one can explain why the ancient Iranian nomads ceded the steppe to the Turks. Since then, many Iranians have renounced and continued the glory of the Iranian conquerors under the name of Oghuz. Under the name of the Seljuks, the former Iranians created the «South Asian way» towards Europe – not as fast as the Turkites, but in 500 years, they reached Vienna under the name of the Ottomans. What happened to the ancient Iranians was that they gave way to the Turks; moreover, they renounced so much that they fought with other descendants of the Aryans in Iran and Azerbaijan. These ancient Iranians were known to the world by names such as Saks, Massagets, and Sarmatians. These ancient Iranians also lived in the Turfan oasis on the rights of the indigenous inhabitants. The modern descendants of these ancient Iranians, the Uighurs, will not let you lie. But the Uighurs also speak the Turkic language. After all, the ancient Iranians were known to the ancient Chinese under the name Yueji. How many descendants of ancient Iranians turned into Turks – millions!

All these tribes of ancient Iranians spoke different dialects of the Proto-Iranian language. But these ancient Iranians fought with each other, like the Mongols before Genghis Khan, like Kazakh tribes before the arrival of the Russians, but the Mongolian and Kazakh eternal showdowns are pathetic copies of the ancient Iranian thousand-year showdowns (the Mongols, by the way, could not impose the Mongolian language on the conquered world, although they followed the same route). What can I say: the worst enemies, Cyrus of Persia and the queen of the Massagets Tomiris in 530 BC, could talk to each other, most likely without translators. The Parthians took power from the Persians in Central Asia. The antagonism between Iran and Turan is not an Iranian-Turkic antagonism. These ancient Iranians fought with each other for a thousand years. Today, only Shiite Iran is the heir of all the once glorious ancient Iranians, bringing diversity to the motley Islamic world. What happened to the ancient Iranians that they turned into Turks and changed their faith?

There is a whole complex of reasons for this historical defeat of the ancient Iranians. But the most important reason is the inability to cooperate strategically. All people with a tribal code, not even a culture, cannot cooperate strategically. To put it even more simply, hostility at the level of one’s small piece of land, a local territory that has received a pathetic extension called homeland. For worms, the shit is housing, for whom, and the swamp is the place of birth. But the inhabitants of one village can challenge the inhabitants of a neighboring village to a fistfight – there was such fun in Russia. In Soviet cities, it was fraught for young people to walk through a strange area. The bloody showdowns of teenage gang fights are copies of Zeref’s reflection. Here, the «protected area» is only an excuse to demonstrate the power. Before Genghis Khan’s activity, the Mongols attacked and slaughtered each other. The Merkits took Genghis Khan’s wife after the raid. Then he returned her with the help of Anda Jamukha with a «Merkit gift,» so his first son Jochi was always called that behind his back.

In the middle of the 6th century, the Turkits passed these steppes in ten years simply because the whole steppe was a sparsely populated territory. This is a territory drained of simple living conditions. No one needs it except nomads (without the arrival of any civilizers, other people can populate no steppes, and the people who lead a nomadic economy will never refuse to do something else: they will be stubborn, they will run the old economy – they will remain in exactly the in a same number of the warriors – combatant. Without the arrival of «colonialists,» the men with a culture of trade, the traditional people cannot grow from the past conventional world in any way because new technologies are needed, especially new thinking and the ability to strategic cooperation. Therefore, all reformers apply radical measures of «re-education». Nomadic people, especially the tribal elite of nomads, will never abandon the «wills of their ancestors.») One skirmish with the Eftalites was enough for turkeys to disperse the other tribes into corners.

Ten years later, the Turkits began fighting over the inheritance because tribal thinking is the eternal ambition of the discontented (The first to rise was the rootless Apa Khan Temeren, the rootless son of a concubine. It was only with the help of the Chinese that the uprising was suppressed). But by 603, the Turkic ale, the empire of the Turks, had been divided into Western and Eastern khaganates. In 744, the Eastern Khaganate fell under the onslaught of the Uighurs. How long, it turns out, did the Turks dominate? Almost 200 years. But the Uighurs themselves already spoke the Turkic language. And the entire Iranian Maveronnahr spoke the Turkic language. Deep cultural reforms have taken place over 200 years. (Before the Tokugawa Shogunate, the ancient inhabitants of Hokkaido, the Ainu had a European appearance. Tokugawa Izyasu ordered the Ainu to be settled throughout Japan. Modern Ainu looks no different from the Japanese. But the residents of Bukhara, Khorezm, and Samarkand still resemble Iranians. But they speak the Turkic language because the inhabitants of the Chagatai ulus were not forcibly resettled anywhere, and the Mongols were not imported.

Interestingly, most modern Kyrgyz have Aryan R1a but look like Mongols. Did the ancient Iranians marry Mongolian women? When did this happen? This is not a question on our topic)

PS. When I ask a Kazakh to take my book, do I have nothing to do? No, I have something to show. I need to show Kazakh ambitions. Even the poorest, most insignificant Kazakh has them. I need to indicate an inability to cooperate strategically. Kazakhs are solidifying so far at the family level. Even in business, the first thought of a Kazakh is to please his family and himself, to show success to his relatives. Hence, all the show-offs. None of the «guests» notice the friendship of the Kazakhs. And they use it well. For Kazakhs, disassembly among themselves is more important. When a dignitary Kazakh is in power and has access to a feeder, he will not greet a dissident. When a dignitary Kazakh is removed from office, he even hugs you. But if the Kazakh is brought back to power again, he will similarly behave arrogantly, again pretending that he does not know you – no matter what happens.

Chapter 11

The strength of blood and the weakness of strength

The inability to strategic cooperation pursued all the peoples of the blood, including those who lived up to world democracy, or with the most extreme new hypocrisy like of the folks of money. There were moments when the peoples of blood, especially in the form of nomads, created world history. As a rule, nature was to blame for everything. (When the people of the blood are well, that is, satisfying, they are incapable of anything. Just about this time, the talkers of modernity like to rant: nomads, they say, contemplators of nature, such total democrats, who do not offend any divine creature. No. Just the nomads were fierce beasts. They even hated each other – raided, robbed, killed. Ashin’s men beat the Yuejas. Yuezhi renounced and turned into Chateau Turks, that is, Oguzes. The Oguzes engaged in the genocide of the same Oguzes, known in Russia as the Pechenegs. Another tribe of Turks, from the abandoned tribes, under the name of Cumans -Cumans, engaged in the genocide of the Pechenegs until they were utterly overtaken and destroyed. After the Pechenegs, it was the turn of the Cumans – Kipchaks themselves.

The Mongols (apparently also Turks) of Genghis Khan drove the Kipchaks to Pannonia. There are thousands of such examples. Everywhere, even in Eurasia, even in South and North America, and even in modern Africa, there is always some Bhutus who cut Tutsis). And this is always explained by the inability of the peoples of the blood to coexist otherwise than by blood. (The Romans could not defend themselves from the hordes of Attila; too large an area would have to be fenced off like the Great Wall of China. But all de against the Picts they built their ramparts in Britain). And if peoples live by blood, that is, by kinship, then they are a priori not capable of a long peace, according to Revcon, it means strategic cooperation (even easier, such people do not trust, dislike, compete, and envy).

Civilization adjusts this communication as a derivative of a long history and an extended policy. People of blood live quietly and peacefully for the time being. Civilizational mechanisms restrict tribal people from conflicts and inhibit them from genetic outbreaks – these people seem to be floating in the mainstream of events with their hands tied. But people of blood and kinship still do not want to cooperate; they prefer to communicate with relatives and not only perform rituals, including at the highest level – at the state level. You should understand that if people remember their families, it means they are incapable of state management; that is, they will not pick up talents; they will pick up the most talented relatives, and this narrows the base of the nation (let’s call a similar illusion floating in the channel that way because there are no other names. They’ll tell me, are we the only ones? Yes, you’re right. You are not alone; many similar peoples and states live by the voice of blood with a gag of civilization in their mouths. Yes, what can I say? The Japanese drew the emblems of their company on kimonos, and Japanese firms were created according to the clan-family principle – they imitate the samurai tradition. There used to be family hieroglyphs on the kimono. There is a Kazakh habit of not noticing or passing by if this Kazakh is an official or the editor feeds the family on the trust of the authorities. And our power is also tied to the family. The family state in our country is not figurative but literal. We all walk around with the gags of civilization and squint our eyes, narrow them, smile, and throw dirt behind our eyes. If you are outside the Horde, you are dangerous for… to one family’s prosperity. Every Kazakh in a European costume is, therefore, comical if you look at his translational fluorography – not external, everything is fine with the costume and gait, but hidden, invisible. Thus, everything falls into place).

These are the rudiments of a consanguineous world when everyone was equal. There was no early feudal dictate of property on relationships yet. This will eventually develop the feudal dictate of the elite. But it won’t be just the voice of blood anymore. The voice of blood will have to go around the land hills. The feudal dictatorship is already the dictate of the land, not blood in its purest form. All the people engaged in agriculture quickly moved to such cooperation between the elite and the common people. They made their way into the traditional elite, into the aristocracy by talents. Nobility in the form of constancy of actions – the actions of several dynasty members are required for the family’s «handwriting.» A settled system can include as many options for cooperation as possible, including the voice of blood, but in this case, the blood constantly cools down. The logical constructions of the cold mind begin to impose the first node on the blood. When necessary, the principle of kinship is included, mainly for the political purposes of the strategy. The feudal society differs from the vicious one in that the elite assumes strategic cooperation. All unions begin to take shape in the form of dynastic marriages (A simple person thinks that shezhire protects against incest so that the people consist of healthy warriors – this is a stereotype of the common people). Dynastic marriages are necessary for long-term power. (If you see a «blind,» that is, a hypocrite savage editor passing by, he also adheres to this line. He cannot and is not capable of strategic cooperation. Therefore, the entire information strategy in such a world is supported by people of the philosophy of culture of money. They love such situations, and of course, no one has canceled the money yet).

But why did the nomads «chase» all the farmers, starting from the farmers of the Nile Valley and ending with the Yuezhs of Sogd? For the joy of stupid patriots. And this is even though the culture of money is dominant today, using all the stupid cries for controlled chaos.

Glossary:

Revcon – the ideology of revolutionary conservatism, necessary for radical reforms of traditional society

shezhire – list of seven tribes of ancestors of each Kazakh clan.

Chapter 12

Free riders are still riding

It is tough to rise, to break into leaders or the elite in a society of people with a thin cortex, and that’s why. It is in the cortex, and that’s why all the connections and the memory of actions are formed – in the human brain, in the cerebral cortex, there is a socialization of the entire experience.

A tribal society is a community of equally envious «communists» watching each other. No wonder (the Communists of the Stalin system followed it and created arbitrariness – these are genes, not an idea). Because of the primitive of such communism, each of the «equals» was on his mind; this affected the fate of official communism, which officially disappeared in 1991 (they are still on their mind: someone in memory of Soviet communism performs well – these are artists, such as the Communist Party In Russia, and the so-called The Kazakh People’s Party. Who else? They think of themselves as leaders-activists in social networks, although they should shut up and look for the best and not offer themselves as weak. Idiots, calm down!) if you are seen as an equal, no one will allow you to be at the top. If you are not equal among your peers, you just won’t be forgiven for it. You don’t even need a contract of equals to do this. There are still such «equals»; there are many of them. This equality is absolutely immaterial. This equality of the soul echoes primitive equality and rivalry simultaneously. Now, it is still the greedy equality of the savages of democracy, but no one knows about it. Everyone knows that traditional people love the humble, that’s all. All conservative peoples have atavisms of primitive communism, and modesty is its daughter. This daughter is now being used in a brothel with the sign «Democracy.» But, almost all conservative nations in the person of the representative persons of the elite do not seem to notice this. And where the official elite goes, the whole herd goes. In fact, this egoism of savages is actively used by the so-called democracy when the habits of savages and savage hacks are taken under control. But savages – absolutely literate today, absolutely consciously – voluntarily go into bondage, like the same Indians who did not know what kind of beads the Columbus sailors gave them… Obeying their instincts, the elite hid a lot of money – part of the common spoils of the whole people: no one will forgive them for this betrayal. Although, perhaps, at this moment, people are fawning over this government, which means they want to get something else. The fact that it is easy to take savages through the bribery of elites has long become clear. But before that, these elites achieved their elevation. The very height – where envy, jealousy, and the stones no longer reach. Stones will fly to corrupt officials later. This guaranteed curse has been retroactively recorded more than once by events. Civilization and democracy have made savages weak.

If these elites have achieved their indisputability, this is another stage.

These same conservative people have strict rules of hierarchy. Hierarchy restrains the natural egoism, anarchy, freedom, and pseudo-communism of every savage. Savages could not forgive each other’s talents; civilization had taught them that. But before that, jealousy and envy were controlled only by the Asian dictatorship. Dictators or feudal elites have taken all instincts under control. Democracy accuses savages today that they have not fully revealed themselves, that they are ashamed of their inner forces in order not to be shy and throw off their rulers. The financiers of the World Bank tell them: "You are personalities (really they say them you are savages)! Free yourself from your elite, from autocracy" – so they are being told from across the ocean, and Soros’ people, who receive money from Soros funds, agree like parrots and monkeys. But this means that primitive communism is coming again, jealousy and envy of all against all, that is, civil war. Conservative people do not need to be taught; they are so «personalities by nature,» free personalities, each by himself, free riders – not knowing that people of money will come up with this for themselves. But people of money are people of deep strategy among a similar rabble. These tradesmen have learned to create workshops, unions, unions of entrepreneurs, etc. You don’t have to do anything, and you are a person! Just trade. Before appearing as a modern world mafia, an international force, the Refags went a long way in the community, that is, the friendship of the rootless and hungry in the slums of vagrants and in the garbage streets, who learned to be friends with a distant goal, which they did not know about then. These vagabonds today control genetic warriors who continue their feud. These people, in the form of financiers, control the whole world. There are still islands of conservative resistance.

Then, we can say that all nomads are individuals without money. Just were wild people without money. They don’t like it when an equal outranks them on an invisible horse. They know who is who among themselves. This is the primal pride of jerks, which does not allow the cortex to thicken and does not allow the creation of alliances, except for dynasties, except for the contract of the elite. It does not give a reason for strategic cooperation except for warfighting. It is necessary to jump to the top so that the envy and the running boards of the brothers – friends of the «savages» could no longer reach to them. It’s pointless to shit to anybody  if you can’t get results. This is a human expectation, and an eternal one, that «Akela will old.» the materialist theory explains the appearance of classes, in our case, the landed aristocracy, the growth of technology and technology, and the appearance of surpluses. This violates the primal harmony of equality, the attraction of blood, egoism, and the anarchy of horsemen. If I’m not the first, you won’t be either! So unconsciously, all the savages of the world still think, but they do not know about these secrets of their souls; they do it. Every conservative nation has its way. How they got gagged, how their hands were tied, each such person has its scores with civilization.

The aristocracy is separated from relatives, so it is separated from the guardianship and egoism of equal zerefs. The aristocracy has taught conditionally related «hyenas» for a long time that there can be no former equality. It takes on the function of noble control, if necessary, provides, makes allowances, frees poor relatives, and takes on the function of patrons. (It is still possible to observe the release of the law of the «lord’s shoulder» and other benefits on behalf of some local leaders; this line is repeated by more minor government officials, who, they say, decided they grant the benefits for the poor). Thank you, my dears. I’ve had enough of equality, so I’ve had enough of the accompanying jealousy. From now on, I’m not unequal to you; get used to it. I’m an aristocrat, and I’m taller than you, freaks. The word freaks does not sound at this moment, but every dictator works as if he curses everyone and takes revenge. That’s what it is, not the surplus an iron plow obtains. Although formally, it is the iron plow that is guilty – it has strengthened, strengthened the sense of superiority. There is no turning back.

Chapter 13

How the Seljuk Turks appeared on the historical scene

If brothers by faith replace brothers by blood, what’s important about it?

The inability to form a strategic alliance (a permanent marker of savages) is not always a bad thing. History knows many such savage victories. (The savage who was behind can outrun any cultured smartass even now. This is a frequent occurrence. But the conservatives themselves lose from this). This requires favorable conditions. But for this, firstly, the system’s collapse is needed when problems in any state and even in the empire escalate. The invasion of the mass of savages may look treacherous as if the vultures feel the decomposition of the «corpse.» That’s not so. This does not mean that the savages did not have problems either. At this moment, the whole planet is covered with problems (at the same time, if I may say so, the situation of the global crisis is not only modernity, it has always been like this, but then there was no globality to make a clear picture out of chaos). In the state, everything is much more complicated. Nomads depended on nature, any jute (when not the steppe fodder for cattle), and end-nomads attacked neighbors. At this moment, all the conditional neighboring savages have no fewer problems – it’s not interesting to anyone. So, where are they to go? They go to the empire! Oh, how scary to us! But hunger is not a kind aunt. Thus, the Hyksos came to the Egyptians and captured Egypt of the XII dynasty – this is perhaps the first case of the nomads’ luck. Then the Visigoths entered Near Asia, the province of Rome – this is the second significant case – de facto, the collapse of the Roman Empire began. The Roman Empire is no joke. However, it was the barbarians who made the onslaught. Further-more).

What is the difference between the problems among the «brothers» and among the aristocracy? The crisis in the empire is usually associated with elite showdowns, and the brothers fight just like that (somewhere in the ass of them, it boiled over – it started playing, and the brothers fought – the usual savage case). In the early feudal state, even great empires perished under the blows of tribal unions, including nomads, which created a precedent for the «greatness» of the barbarians. This plays into the hands of modern nationalists: they say we were so great, we took Rome in the past. No one is interested in the reasons. The reasons for the superiority of a friendly gang of robbers over the gentlemen. That all barbarians have to go exactly the same way from barbarism to civilization is no longer interesting to anyone. The main thing is to tickle your complexes and your own vanity).

As we already know, not only the early feudal states but also later communities are attempts by some of the «brothers» to prove that they are far from the brotherhood, have cooled down from kinship feelings; therefore, they are fed up with envy and jealousy of their fellow tribesmen, that they are now not brothers, but they are an aristocracy now and a privileged stratum. There is only one remedy against this – to rise above the clan, above the people (all the leaders, even the modern Elbasy, still do this; this is not trivia for us, the zeref’s reflection has been ruling for 5000 years). Suppose strategic diplomacy appears in the form of dynastic marriages. In that case, this is already the handwriting of the aristocracy (in any form of manifestation, if we want to create a planetary elite today – A.B.) It’s better to let equal envy and be jealous of your equal, although it’s not so vile.

Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

Текст предоставлен ООО «Литрес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на Литрес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.