Полная версия
The Life of John Marshall, Volume 1: Frontiersman, soldier, lawmaker, 1755-1788
152
Sparks, 11; and Irving, i, 33.
153
For Fairfax's influence on Washington see Irving, i, 45; and in general, for fair secondary accounts of Fairfax, see ib., 31-46; and Sparks, 10-11.
154
Senator Humphrey Marshall says that Thomas Marshall "emulated" Washington. (Humphrey Marshall, i, 345.)
155
See infra.
156
Bond of Thomas Marshall as Sheriff, Oct. 26, 1767; Records of Fauquier County (Va.), Deed Book, iii, 70. Approval of bond by County Court; Minute Book (from 1764 to 1768), 322. Marshall's bond was "to his Majesty, George III," to secure payment to the British revenue officers of all money collected by Marshall for the Crown. (Records of Fauquier County (Va.), Deed Book, iii, 71.)
157
Bruce: Inst., i, 597, 600; also, ii, 408, 570-74.
158
Records of Fauquier County (Va.), Deed Book, ii, 42. There is a curious record of a lease from Lord Fairfax in 1768 to John Marshall for his life and "the natural lives of Mary his wife and Thomas Marshall his son and every of them longest living." (Records of Fauquier County (Va.), Deed Book, iii, 230.) John Marshall was then only thirteen years old. The lease probably was to Thomas Marshall, the clerk of Lord Fairfax having confused the names of father and son.
159
Meade, ii, 218.
160
In 1773 three deeds for an aggregate of two hundred and twenty acres "for a glebe" were recorded in Fauquier County to "Thos. Marshall & Others, Gentlemen, & Vestrymen of Leeds Parish." (Records of Fauquier County (Va.), Deed Book, v, 401, 403, 422.)
161
The vestrymen were "the foremost men … in the parish … whether from the point of view of intelligence, wealth or social position." (Bruce: Inst., i, 62; and see Meade, i, 191.)
162
Bruce: Inst., i, 62-93; and see Eckenrode: S.C. & S., 13.
163
Bruce: Inst., i, 131 et seq.
164
Meade, ii, 219. Bishop Meade here makes a slight error. He says that Mr. Thompson "lived at first in the family of Colonel Thomas Marshall, of Oak Hill." Thomas Marshall did not become a colonel until ten years afterward. (Heitman, 285.) And he did not move to Oak Hill until 1773, six years later. (Paxton, 20.)
165
James Thompson was born in 1739. (Meade, ii, 219.)
166
Ib.
167
Forty years later La Rochefoucauld found that the whole family and all visitors slept in the same room of the cabins of the back country. (La Rochefoucauld, iv, 595-96.)
168
"I have not sleep'd above three nights or four in a bed, but, after walking … all the day, I lay down before the fire upon a little hay, straw, fodder or bearskin … with man, wife, and children, like a parcel of dogs and cats; and happy is he, who gets the berth nearest the fire." (Washington to a friend, in 1748; Writings: Ford, i, 7.)
Here is another of Washington's descriptions of frontier comforts: "I not being so good a woodsman as ye rest of my company, striped myself very orderly and went into ye Bed, as they calld it, when to my surprize, I found it to be nothing but a little straw matted together without sheets or any thing else, but only one thread bear [sic] blanket with double its weight of vermin such as Lice, Fleas, &c." (Washington's Diary, March 15, 1747; ib., 2.) And see La Rochefoucauld, iii, 175, for description of homes of farmers in the Valley forty years later – miserable log huts "which swarmed with children." Thomas Marshall's little house was much better than, and the manners of the family were far superior to, those described by Washington and La Rochefoucauld.
169
Meade, ii, 219.
170
Ib. Bishop Meade says that Thomas Marshall's sons were sent to Mr. Thompson again; but Marshall himself told Justice Story that the Scotch parson taught him when the clergyman lived at his father's house.
171
Meade, ii, 219. This extract of Mr. Thompson's sermon was treasonable from the Tory point of view. See infra, chap. III.
172
Records of Fauquier County (Va.), Deed Book, V, 282. This purchase made Thomas Marshall the owner of about two thousand acres of the best land in Fauquier County. He had sold his Goose Creek holding in "The Hollow."
173
The local legend, current to the present day, is that this house had the first glass windows in that region, and that the bricks in the chimney were imported from England. The importation of brick, however, is doubtful. Very little brick was brought to Virginia from England.
174
Five more children of Thomas and Mary Marshall were born in this house: Louis, 1773; Susan, 1775; Charlotte, 1777; Jane, 1779; and Nancy, 1781. (Paxton.)
175
This volume is now in the possession of Judge J. K. M. Norton, of Alexandria, Va. On several leaves are printed the names of the subscribers. Among them are Pelatiah Webster, James Wilson, Nathanael Greene, John Adams, and others.
176
Autobiography.
177
Binney, in Dillon, iii, 286.
178
Story and Binney say that Marshall's first schooling was at Campbell's "academy" and his second and private instruction under Mr. Thompson. The reverse seems to have been the case.
179
Meade, ii, 159, and footnote to 160.
180
Ib., 161.
181
Ib.
182
Journal, H.B. (1761-65), 3. Thomas Marshall was seldom out of office. Burgess, Sheriff, Vestryman, Clerk, were the promising beginnings of his crowded office-holding career. He became Surveyor of Fayette County, Kentucky, upon his removal to that district, and afterwards Collector of Revenue for the District of Ohio. (Humphrey Marshall, i, 120; and see ii, chap. V, of this work. Thomas Marshall to Adams, April 28, 1797; MS.) In holding offices, John Marshall followed in his father's footsteps.
183
Journal, H.B. (1766-69), 147 and 257.
184
His election was contested in the House, but decided in Marshall's favor. (Ib. (1761-69), 272, 290, 291.)
185
Ib., (1773-76), 9. County Clerks were then appointed by the Secretary of State. In some respects the Clerk of the County Court had greater advantages than the Sheriff. (See Bruce: Inst., i, 588 et seq.) Dunmore County is now Shenandoah County. The Revolution changed the name. When Thomas Marshall was appointed Clerk, the House of Burgesses asked the Governor to issue a writ for a new election in Fauquier County to fill Marshall's place as Burgess. (Ib. (1773-76), 9.)
186
Ib. (1766-69), 163.
187
Ib., 16, 71, 257; (1770-72), 17, 62, 123, 147, 204, 234, 251, 257, 274, 292; (1773-76), 217, 240.
188
Ambler, Introduction.
189
Ambler, 17-18.
190
Henry, i, 71.
191
Ib., 76-77.
192
Henry, i, 39-48.
193
Wirt, 71 et seq. It passed the House (Journal, H.B. (1761-65), 350); but was disapproved by the Council. (Ib., 356; and see Henry, i, 78.)
194
The "ayes" and "noes" were not recorded in the Journals of the House; but Jefferson says, in his description of the event, which he personally witnessed, that Henry "carried with him all the members of the upper counties and left a minority composed merely of the aristocracy." (Wirt, 71.) "The members, who, like himself [Henry], represented the yeomanry of the colony, were filled with admiration and delight." (Henry, i, 78.)
195
Wirt, 71. The incident, it appears, was considered closed with the defeat of the loan-office bill. Robinson having died, nothing further was done in the matter. For excellent condensed account see Eckenrode: R. V., 16-17.
196
Declaratory Resolutions.
197
For the incredible submission and indifference of the colonies before Patrick Henry's speech, see Henry, i, 63-67. The authorities given in those pages are conclusive.
198
Ib., 67.
199
Ib., 80-81.
200
Ib., 82-86.
201
Wirt, 74-76.
202
Eckenrode: R. V., 5-6.
203
"The members from the upper counties invariably supported Mr. Henry in his revolutionary measures." (Jefferson's statement to Daniel Webster, quoted in Henry, i, 87.)
204
Henry, i, 86.
205
Henry, i, 86, and authorities there cited in the footnote.
206
Misquoted in Wirt (79) as "500 guineas."
207
Jefferson to Wirt, Aug. 14, 1814; Works: Ford, xi, 404.
208
It is most unfortunate that the "ayes" and "noes" were not kept in the House of Burgesses. In the absence of such a record, Jefferson's repeated testimony that the up-country members voted and worked with Henry must be taken as conclusive of Thomas Marshall's vote. For not only was Marshall Burgess from a frontier county, but Jefferson, at the time he wrote to Wirt in 1814 (and gave the same account to others later), had become very bitter against the Marshalls and constantly attacked John Marshall whom he hated virulently. If Thomas Marshall had voted out of his class and against Henry, so remarkable a circumstance would surely have been mentioned by Jefferson, who never overlooked any circumstance unfavorable to an enemy. Far more positive evidence, however, is the fact that Washington, who was a Burgess, voted with Henry, as his letter to Francis Dandridge, Sept. 20, 1765, shows. (Writings: Ford, ii, 209.) And Thomas Marshall always acted with Washington.
209
"By these resolutions, Mr. Henry took the lead out of the hands of those who had heretofore guided the proceedings of the House." (Jefferson to Wirt, Aug. 14, 1814; Works: Ford, xi, 406.)
210
Proceedings, Va. Conv., 1775, March 20, 3; July 17, 3, 5, 7.
211
Henry, i, 255-61; Wirt, 117-19. Except Henry's speech itself, Wirt's summary of the arguments of the conservatives is much the best account of the opposition to Henry's fateful resolutions.
212
Wirt, 142; Henry, i, 261-66.
213
Ib., 271; and Wirt, 143.
214
In the absence of the positive proof afforded by a record of the "ayes" and "noes," Jefferson's testimony, Washington's vote, Thomas Marshall's tribute to Henry, and above all, the sentiment of the frontier county he represented, are conclusive testimony as to Thomas Marshall's stand in this all-important legislative battle which was the precursor of the iron conflict soon to come in which he bore so heroic a part. (See Humphrey Marshall, i, 344.)
215
Washington was appointed a member of the committee provided for in Henry's second resolution. (Henry, i, 271.)
216
Thomas Marshall had been ensign, lieutenant, and captain in the militia, had taken part in the Indian wars, and was a trained soldier. (Crozier: Virginia Colonial Militia, 96.)
217
Slaughter, 107-08. This was "the first minute battalion raised within this Commonwealth." (Memorial of Thomas Marshall to the Virginia Legislature for military "emoluments"; MS. Archives, Va. St. Lib.) Appendix IV.
218
Washington to Mason, April 5, 1769; Writings: Ford, ii, 263.
219
Meade, ii, 219.
220
Binney, in Dillon, iii, 286.
221
Ib.
222
Statement of eye-witness. (Binney, in Dillon, iii, 287.)
223
Ib., 288.
224
In all descriptions of Marshall, it is stated that his eyes were black and brilliant. His portraits, however, show them as dark brown, but keen and piercing.
225
Binney, in Dillon, iii, 287-88.
226
Ib.
227
Binney, in Dillon, iii, 288.
228
Not only do we find Marshalls, father and sons, taking gallant part in the Revolutionary War, but, thereafter, advocates of war with any country when the honor or interest of America was at stake.
229
Binney, in Dillon, iii, 288.
230
Infra, chap. IV.
231
Slaughter, 107-08. But Binney's informant says that it was twenty miles from the court-house. (Binney, in Dillon, iii, 286.)
232
Slaughter, 107-08; and certificate of J. Marshall in pension claim of William Payne; MSS. Rev. War, S. F. no. 8938½, Pension Bureau.
233
Slaughter, 107-08.
234
Ib.
235
Campbell, 607-14.
236
Slaughter, 107-08; certificate of J. Marshall in pension claim of David Jameson; MSS. Rev. War, S. F. no. 5607, Pension Bureau.
237
Only the Tories and the disaffected were frightened by these back-countrymen. Apparently Slaughter took this for granted and failed to make the distinction.
238
"The people hearing that we came from the backwoods, and seeing our savage-looking equipments, seemed as much afraid of us as if we had been Indians," writes the chronicler of that march. But the people, it appears, soon got over their fright; for this frontier soldiery, as one of them relates, "took pride in demeaning ourselves as patriots and gentlemen, and the people soon treated us with respect and great kindness." (Slaughter, 107-08.)
239
Slaughter, 107-08.
240
Ib.
241
Campbell, 633-34; Eckenrode: R. V., 81, 82.
242
Burk, iv, 85; and Lossing, ii, 535-36.
243
Marshall, i, 69; and Campbell, 635.
244
Marshall to Samuel Templeman, Richmond, Sept. 26, 1832, supporting latter's claim for pension; MSS. Rev. War, S. F. no. 6204, Pension Bureau.
245
For the conduct of the men then in supreme authority in Virginia see Wirt, 166-81; and Henry, i, 333-36; also, Campbell, 636 et seq.; and see Eckenrode: R. V., 75.
246
Marshall, i, 69; and see Eckenrode: R. V., chap. iii, for the best account that has been given of this important episode. Dr. Eckenrode's narrative is a complete statement, from original sources, of every phase of this initial armed conflict between the patriots and Royalists in Virginia. Also see affidavit of Marshall in pension claim of William Payne, April 26, 1832; MSS. Rev. War, S. F. no. 8938½, Pension Bureau.
247
Affidavit of Marshall in pension claim of William Payne, April 26, 1832: MSS. Rev. War, S. F. no. 8938½, Pension Bureau.
248
Memorial of Thomas Marshall. (Supra, and Appendix IV.)
249
This uniform was rare; it is probable, however, that Thomas Marshall procured it for himself and son. He could afford it at that time, and he was a very proud man.
250
Chastellux found the army nearly disbanded from necessity in 1782. (Chastellux, translator's note to 60.)
251
Washington to President of Congress, Jan. 24, 1776; Writings: Ford, iii, 372-73.
252
Washington to Reed, Feb. 10, 1776; ib., 413.
253
Washington to Committee of Safety of New York, April 27, 1776; Writings: Ford, iv, 51-52.
254
Washington to President of Congress, Sept. 20, 1776; ib., 422.
255
Washington to President of Congress, Sept. 24, 1776; ib., 439.
256
Washington to Major-General Lee, Dec. 1, 1776; ib., v, 62.
257
General Greene to Governor Cooke, Dec. 4, 1776; ib., footnote to 62.
258
Washington to President of Congress, Dec. 12, 1776; Writings: Ford, v, 84.
259
Washington to President of Congress, Dec. 24, 1776; ib., 129-30. While Washington was desperately badly off, he exaggerates somewhat in this despondent report, as Mr. Ford's footnote (ib., 130) shows.
260
Washington to President of Congress, Nov. 11, 1776; ib., 19.
261
Washington to John Augustine Washington, Nov. 19, 1776; Writings: Ford, v, 38-39.
262
Washington to President of Congress, Sept. 8, 1776; ib., iv, 397.
263
Washington to John Augustine Washington, Sept. 22, 1776; ib., 429.
264
Washington to Lund Washington, Sept. 30, 1776; Writings: Ford, iv, 457-59.
265
Washington to John Augustine Washington, Feb. 24, 1777; ib., v, 252. The militia officers were elected "without respect either to service or experience." (Chastellux, 235.)
266
Kapp, 115.
267
The Crisis: Paine; Writings: Conway, i, 175.
268
Marshall (1st ed.), iii, 66.
269
The militia were worse than wasteful and unmanageable; they deserted by companies. (Hatch, 72-73.)
270
Washington to Wharton, Oct. 17, 1777: Writings: Ford, vi, 118-19.
271
Ib.
272
Washington to John Augustine Washington, Oct. 18, 1777; ib., 126-29.
273
Livingston to Washington, Aug. 12, 1776; Cor. Rev.: Sparks, i, 275.
274
Lee to Washington, Nov. 12, 1776; ib., 305.
275
Sullivan to Washington, March 7, 1777; ib., 353-54.
276
Schuyler to Washington, Sept. 9. 1776; ib., 287.
277
Smith to McHenry, Dec. 10, 1778; Steiner, 21.
278
Chastellux, 44; and see Moore's Diary, i, 399-400; and infra, chap. IV.
279
Washington to Livingston, Dec. 31, 1777; Writings: Ford, vi, 272.
280
Washington to President of Congress, Dec. 23, 1777; ib., 260; and see ib., 267.
281
Pa. Mag. Hist. and Biog., 1890-91 (2d Series), vi, 79. Most faces among the patriot troops were pitted with this plague. Washington was deeply pockmarked. He had the smallpox in the Barbadoes when he was nineteen years old. (Sparks, 15.)
282
Weedon, Jan. 6, 1778, 183.
283
Hatch, 135; and Kapp, 109.
284
Proc., Mass. Hist. Soc. (2d Series), vi, 93.
285
Ib. Entries of desertions and savage punishment are frequent in Wild's Diary; see p. 135 as an example. Also see Moore's Diary, i, 405.
286
Weedon, 14.
287
Ib., Sept. 3, 1777, 30.
288
Ib., Sept. 15, 1777, 52. And see Sept. 6, p. 36, where officers as well as privates are ordered "instantly Shot" if they are "so far lost to all Shame as basely to quit their posts without orders, or shall skulk from Danger or offer to retreat before orders."
289
Livingston to Webb, May 28, 1781; Writings: Ford, ix, footnote to 267.
290
One reason for the chaotic state of the army was the lack of trained officers and the ignorance of the majority of common soldiers in regard to the simplest elements of drill or discipline. Many of the bearers of commissions knew little more than the men; and of such untrained officers there was an overabundance. (Hatch, 13-15.) To Baron von Steuben's training of privates as well as officers is due the chief credit for remedying this all but fatal defect. (Kapp, 126-35; also infra, chap. IV.)
291
For statement of conditions in the American army throughout the war see Hatch; also, Bolton.
292
The States were childishly jealous of one another. Their different laws on the subject of rank alone caused unbelievable confusion. (Hatch, 13-16. And see Watson, 64, for local feeling, and inefficiency caused by the organization of the army into State lines.)
293
Hatch says that Connecticut provided most bountifully for her men. (Hatch, 87.) But Chastellux found the Pennsylvania line the best equipped; each Pennsylvania regiment had even a band of music. (Chastellux, 65.)
294
"The only garment they possess is a blanket elegantly twined about them. You may judge, sir, how much this apparel graces their appearance in parade." (Inspector Fleury to Von Steuben, May 13, 1778; as quoted in Hatch, 87.)
295
Diary of Joseph Clark; Proceedings, N.J. Hist. Soc. (1st Series), vii, 104. The States would give no revenue to the general Government and the officers thought the country would go to pieces. (Hatch, 154.)
296
Heitman, 285.
297
Binney, in Dillon, iii, 284.
298
Washington to Committee of Congress, July 19, 1777; Writings: Ford, v, 495.
299
Washington to President of Congress, Aug. 23, 1777; Writings: Ford, vi, 50; also see Marshall (1st ed.), iii, 126.
300
Marshall (1st ed.), iii, 126.
301
Ib., 127.
302
On this subject see Waldo's poem, Hist. Mag., vii, 274; and Clark's Diary, Proc., N.J. Hist. Soc., vii, 102.
303
Weedon, Aug. 23, 1777, 19.
304
Marshall (1st ed.), iii, 127.
305
Ib., 128; and see Trevelyan, iv, 226.
306
Marshall (1st ed.), iii, 127-29; ib. (2d ed.), i, 154-56; Washington to President of Congress, Sept. 3, 1777; Writings: Ford, vi, 64-65.
307
Story, in Dillon, iii, 335.
308
Washington to President of Congress, Sept 11, 1777; Writings: Ford, vi, 69.
309
Marshall (1st ed.), iii, 131; ib. (2d ed.), i, 156. Colonel Harrison, Washington's Secretary, reported immediately to the President of Congress that Maxwell's men believed that they killed or wounded "at least three hundred" of the British. (Harrison to President of Congress, Sept. 11, 1777; Writings: Ford, vi, footnote to 68.)
310
Marshall, i, 156. The fact that Marshall places himself in this detachment, which was a part of Maxwell's light infantry, together with his presence at Iron Hill, fixes his position in the battle of the Brandywine and in the movements that immediately followed. It is reasonably certain that he was under Maxwell until just before the battle of Germantown. Of this skirmish Washington's optimistic and excited Secretary wrote on the spot, that Maxwell's men killed thirty men and one captain "left dead on the spot." (Harrison to the President of Congress, Sept. 11, 1777; Writings: Ford, vi, footnote to 68.)