bannerbanner
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 69, No. 427, May, 1851
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 69, No. 427, May, 1851

Полная версия

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 69, No. 427, May, 1851

Язык: Английский
Год издания: 2017
Добавлена:
Настройки чтения
Размер шрифта
Высота строк
Поля
На страницу:
3 из 6
"Ho! thou who seekest late and longA license from the Holy BookFor brutal lust and hell's red wrong,Man of the pulpit, look!Lift up those cold and atheist eyes,This ripe fruit of thy teaching see;And tell us how to Heaven will riseThe incense of this sacrifice —This blossom of the gallows-tree!"

And thus he proceeds, lashing himself into frenzy, through the whole of the piece. We dismiss Mr Whittier, and venture to express a hope that those who appear to be looking into American literature, for the purpose of catering for the English public, will be able to discover and import something better than strains such as these – which administer quite as much to the love of calumny, and an appetite for horrors, as to any sentiment of philanthropy.

The next person whom we have to mention, and probably to introduce for the first time to our readers, is not one whom we can commend for his temperate opinions, or knowledge of the world, or whatever passes under the name of strong common sense or practical sagacity. He is much a dreamer; he has little practical skill, even in his own craft of authorship; but there runs a true vein of poetry through his writings; it runs zig-zag, and is mixed with much dross, and is not extracted without some effort of patience; but there is a portion of the true metal to be found in the works of James Russell Lowell.

Mr Lowell has, we think, much of the true poet in him – ardent feelings and a fertile fancy; the last in undue proportion, or at least under very irregular government. But he lacks taste and judgment, and the greater part of the two small volumes before us is redolent of youth, and we presume that those compositions which stand first in order were really written at an early age. To the very close, however, there is that immaturity of judgment, and that far too enthusiastic view of things and of men, which is only excusable in youth; as witness certain lines "To De Lamartine," towards the end of the second volume.

With one peculiarity we have been very much struck – the combination of much original power with a tendency to imitate, to an almost ludicrous extent, other and contemporary poets. We find, especially in the first volume, imitations which have all the air of a theme or exercise of a young writer, sitting down deliberately to try how far he could succeed in copying the manner of some favourite author. Sometimes it is Keats, sometimes it is Tennyson, who seems to have exercised this fascination over him: he is in the condition of a bewildered musician, who can do nothing but make perpetual variations upon some original melody that has bewitched his ear. He revels with Keats in that poetic imagery and language which has a tendency to separate itself too widely from the substratum of an intelligible meaning, which ought always to be kept at least in sight. At other times he paints ideal portraits of women after the manner of Tennyson. On these last he was perfectly welcome to practise his pictorial art: he might paint as many Irenes as he pleased; but when, in his piece called "The Syrens," he recalls to mind the beautiful poem of "The Lotus Eaters!" our patience broke down – we gave him up – we closed the book in despair. However, at another time we reopened it, and read on, and we are glad we did so; for we discovered that, notwithstanding, this proneness to imitate, and often to imitate what should have been avoided, there was a vein of genuine poetry in the book, some specimens of which we shall proceed to give. It is a task which we the more readily undertake because we suspect that most readers of taste would be disposed, after a cursory perusal, to lay the book aside: they would not have the motive which prompted us to explore further, or to renew their examination.

Mr Lowell's faults lie on the surface; they cannot be disguised, nor will there be the least necessity to quote for the purpose of illustrating them. He is an egregious instance of that half excellence which we have ventured to attribute to such American poets as have come under our notice. The genius of the poet is but partially developed. The peach has ripened but on one side. We want more sun, we want more culture. To speak literally, there is a haste which leads the writer to extravagance of thought, to extravagance of language and imagery; an impatience of study, and of the long labour that alone produces the complete work. The social and economical condition of America has probably something to do with this. It is a condition more favourable to the man and the citizen than propitious to the full development of the poet. In England, or any other old established country, the educated class crowd every profession, and every avenue to employment; if a youth once gives himself up to the fascination of literature, he will probably find himself committed to it for life, and be compelled to accept as a career, what perhaps at first only tempted him as a pleasure. If he wishes to retrace his steps, and resume his place in any profession, he finds that the ranks are closed up; no opening at all presents itself – certainly none which, if he is only wavering in his resolution, will solicit his return. He has wandered from his place in the marching regiment; it has marched on without him, in close order, and there is no room for the repenting truant. Now in America there cannot yet be such over-crowding in all the recognised pursuits of life as to render it difficult or impossible for the truant to return. He is probably even invited, by tempting prospects of success, to re-enter some of those avenues of life which lead to wealth, or to civic prosperity. This must act materially upon the young poet. He indulges his predilections, yet does not feel that he has irrevocably committed himself by so doing. Or if he adopts literature as the main object and serious occupation of his life, he can at the first discouragement – he can, as soon as he has learnt the fact that authorship is a labour, as well as a pleasure – abandon his hasty choice, and adopt an easier and a more profitable career. He has not burnt his ships. They lie in the offing still; they are ready to transport him from this enchanted island to which some perverse wind has blown him, and restore him to the stable continent. Retreat is still open; he does not feel that he must here conquer or be utterly lost; there is no desperate courage, nothing to induce strenuous and indefatigable labour.

But to Mr Lowell. The first piece in his collection of poems is entitled "A Legend of Brittany." The subject is as grotesque as legendary lore could have supplied him with. A knight-templar, a soldier-priest who has taken the vow of chastity at a time and place when that vow was expected to be kept, has fallen in love with a beautiful girl. He seduces her; then to hide his own disgrace he murders her; and he buries the body, with the unborn infant, under the altar of the church! One day at high mass, when the guilty templar is there himself standing, with others, round the altar, a voice is heard, a vision is seen – it is the spirit of the murdered girl and mother. She appears – not to denounce the assassin – she regrets to expose his guilt – there is so much woman in the angel that she loves him still – she appears to claim the rite of baptism for her unborn infant, who, till that rite is performed, wanders in darkness and in pain. The legend must have received this turn during some Gorham controversy now happily forgotten. Notwithstanding the very strange nature of the whole story, there is a pleasing tenderness in this address of the spirit to the wicked templar. After glancing more in sadness than in anger at his falsehood, it continues: —

"And thou hadst never heard such words as these,Save that in heaven I must ever beMost comfortless and wretched, seeing thisOur unbaptisèd babe shut out from bliss.This little spirit, with imploring eyes,Wanders alone the dreary wild of space;The shadow of his pain forever liesUpon my soul in this new dwelling-place;His loneliness makes me in paradiseMore lonely; and unless I see his face,Even here for grief could I lie down and die,Save for my curse of immortality.I am a mother, spirits do not shakeThis much of earth from them, and I must pine,Till I can feel his little hands, and takeHis weary head upon this heart of mine.And might it be, full gladly for his sakeWould I this solitude of bliss resign,And be shut out of heaven to dwell with himFor ever in that silence drear and dim.I strove to hush my soul, and would not speakAt first for thy dear sake. A woman's loveIs mighty, but a mother's heart is weak,And by its weakness overcomes; I stroveTo smother better thoughts with patience meek,But still in the abyss my soul would rove,Seeking my child, and drove me here to claimThe rite that gives him peace in Christ's dear name.I sit and weep while blessed spirits sing:I can but long and pine the while they praise,And, leaning o'er the wall of heaven, I flingMy voice to where I deem my infant stays,Like a robbed bird that cries in vain to bringHer nestlings back beneath her wings' embrace;But still he answers not, and I but knowThat heaven and earth are but alike in woe."

The sacred rite, so piteously pleaded for, was of course duly performed. This poem seems to have been written when Keats was in the ascendant, and predominated over the imagination of our author. Nor has he failed to catch a portion of the finer fancy of that exuberant poet. Such lines as the following are quite in the manner of Keats.

"The deep sky, full-hearted with the moon."… "the nunneries of silent nooks,The murmured longing of the wood."

Or this description: —

"In the courtyard a fountain leaped alway,A Triton blowing jewels through his shellInto the sunshine."

In the second volume we have another legend, or rather a legendary vision, of the author's own invention, which is of a higher import, and still more redolent of poetry. It is called "The vision of Sir Launfal." This knight has a vision, or a dream, in which he beholds himself going forth from his proud castle to accomplish a vow he had made, namely, to seek "over land and sea for the Holy Grail." What the Holy Grail is, Mr Lowell is considerate enough to inform, or remind his readers, in a note which runs thus, – "According to the mythology of the Romancers, the San Greal, or Holy Grail, was the cup out of which Jesus partook of the Last Supper with his disciples. It was brought into England by Joseph of Arimathea, and remained there, an object of pilgrimage and adoration, for many years in the keeping of his lineal descendants. It was incumbent upon those who had charge of it to be chaste in thought, word, and deed; but one of the keepers having broken this condition, the Holy Grail disappeared. From that time it was a favourite enterprise of the knights of Arthur's court to go in search of it." Well, Sir Launfal, in his vision, starts forth upon this knightly and pious enterprise. It is the month of June when he sallies from his castle, and the poet revels in a description of the glories of the summer: —

"Whether we look, or whether we listen,We hear life murmur, or see it glisten:Every clod feels a stir of might,An instinct within it that reaches and towers,And, grasping blindly above it for light,Climbs to a soul in grass and flowers.The cowslip startles in meadows green,The buttercup catches the sun in its chalice,And there's never a leaf or a blade too meanTo be some happy creature's palace;The little bird sits at his door in the sunAtilt like a blossom among the leaves,And lets his illumined being o'errunWith the deluge of summer it receives.His mate feels the eggs beneath her wings,And the heart in her dumb breast flutters and sings —He sings to the wide world, she to her nest.Joy comes, grief goes, we know not how;Everything is happy now,Everything is upward striving;'Tis as easy now for the heart to be trueAs for grass to be green or skies to be blue, —'Tis the natural way of living:Who knows whither the clouds have fled?In the unscarred heaven they leave no wake;And the eyes forget the tears they have shed,And the heart forgets its sorrow and ache;And the soul partakes the season's youth."

The drawbridge of the castle is let down, and Sir Launfal, on his charger, springs from under the archway, clothed in his glittering mail —

"To seek in all climes for the Holy Grail.""As Sir Launfal made morn through the darksome gateHe was ware of a leper, crouched by the same,Who begged with his hand and moaned as he sate;And a loathing over Sir Launfal came;The sunshine went out of his soul with a thrill,The flesh 'neath his armour did shrink and crawl,For this man, so foul and bent of stature,Rasped harshly against his dainty nature,And seemed the one blot on the summer morn, —So he tossed him a piece of gold in scorn.The leper raised not the gold from the dust:'Better to me the poor man's crust.Better the blessing of the poor,Though I turn me empty from his door;That is no true alms which, the hand can hold.'"

Sir Launfal proceeds in search of the Holy Grail; but he finds it not. He returns an old man, worn with toil, and sad at heart, and full of tender commiseration for all the afflicted and distressed. It is winter when he returns to his castle. There sits the same miserable leper, and moans out the same prayer for alms; but this time it is answered in a very different spirit.

"Straightway heRemembered in what a haughty guiseHe had flung an alms to leprosie,When he caged his young life up in gilded mailTo set forth in search of the Holy Grail —The heart within him was ashes and dust;He parted in twain his single crust,He broke the ice on the streamlet's brink,And gave the leper to eat and to drink;'Twas a mouldy crust of coarse brown bread,'Twas water out of a wooden bowl, —Yet with fine wheaten bread was the leper fed,And 'twas red wine he drank with his thirsty soul.As Sir Launfal mused with a downcast face,A light shone round about the place;The leper no longer crouched at his side,But stood before him glorified,And a voice that was calmer than silence said —'In many climes, without avail,Thou hast spent thy life for the Holy Grail;Behold it is here, – this cup which thouDidst fill at the streamlet for me but now!The Holy Supper is kept, indeed,In whatso we share with another's need.'"

Such was the dream or vision of Sir Launfal. We need hardly add that, when he awoke from it, he exclaimed that the Holy Grail was already found – bade his servants hang up his armour on the wall, and open his gates to the needy and the poor.

We shall venture upon one more quotation before we quit Mr Lowell. We must premise that we do not always mark by asterisks the omission that we make, when that omission creates no obscurity whatever in the passage. The following poem we take the liberty of abridging, and we print it, without any interruption of this kind, in its abridged form. In this form it will perhaps remind our readers of some of those tender, simple, and domestic lyrics in which German poetry is so rich. There is no other language from which so many beautiful poems might be collected which refer to childhood, and the love of children, as from the German. It has sometimes occurred to us that our poetesses, or fair translators of poetry, might contrive a charming volume of such lyrics on childhood.

THE CHANGELING

"I had a little daughter,And she was given to meTo lead me gently onwardTo the Heavenly Father's knee.I know not how others saw her,But to me she was wholly fair,And the light of the heaven she came fromStill lingered and gleamed in her hair.She had been with us scarce a twelvemonth,And it hardly seemed a day,When a troop of wandering angelsStole my little daughter away.But they left in her stead a changeling,A little angel child,That seems like her bud in full blossom,And smiles as she never smiled.This child is not mine as the first was,I cannot sing it to rest,I cannot lift it up fatherly,And bless it upon my breast.Yet it lies in my little one's cradle,And sits in my little one's chair,And the light of the heaven she's gone toTransfigures its golden hair."

We have still a brief space for Mr Holmes. It is fit that, amongst our list, there should be one representative of the comic muse. Mr Holmes, however, is not always comic. Some of his serious pieces are not without a certain manly pathos. Some, too, are of a quite didactic character, and have the air of college exercises. But it is only a few of his lighter pieces we should feel any disposition to quote, or refer to. Mr Holmes portrays himself to us as a boon companion; – a physician by profession, and one to whom poetry has been only an occasional amusement – one of those choice spirits who can set the table in a roar, and who can sing himself the good song that he indites. Such being the case, we have only to lay down the critical pen to court amusement ourselves, and conclude our paper by sharing with the reader a few specimens of wit or humour.

Civilised life in New York, or Boston, seems to have the same disagreeable accompaniments as with us – as witness.

THE MUSIC-GRINDERS

"There are three ways in which men takeOne's money from his purse,And very hard it is to tellWhich of the three is worse;But all of them are bad enoughTo make a body curse.You're riding out some pleasant day,And counting up your gains;A fellow jumps from out a bush,And takes your horse's reins;Another hints some words aboutA bullet in your brains.It's hard to meet such pressing friendsIn such a lonely spot;It's very hard to lose your cash,But harder to be shot;And so you take your wallet out,Though you had rather not.Perhaps you're going out to dine,Some filthy creature begsYou'll hear about the cannon-ballThat carried off his pegs;He says it is a dreadful thingFor men to lose their legs.He tells you of his starving wife,His children to be fed,Poor little lovely innocents.All clamorous for bread;And so you kindly help to putA bachelor to bed.You're sitting on your window-seat,Beneath a cloudless moon;You hear a sound that seems to wearThe semblance of a tune,As if a broken fife should striveTo drown a cracked basoon.And nearer, nearer still, the tideOf music seems to come,There's something like a human voiceAnd something like a drum;You sit in speechless agonyUntil your ear is numb.Poor 'home, sweet home,' should seem to beA very dismal place,Your 'auld acquaintance,' all at onceIs altered in the face —But hark! the air again is still,The music all is ground;It cannot be – it is – it is —A hat is going round!No! Pay the dentist when he leavesA fracture in your jaw;And pay the owner of the bear,That stunned you with his paw;And buy the lobster that has hadYour knuckles in his claw;But if you are a portly man,Put on your fiercest frown,And talk about a constableTo turn them out of town;Then close your sentence with an oath,And shut the window down!And if you are a slender man,Not big enough for that,Or, if you cannot make a speech,Because you are a flat,Go very quietly and dropA button in the hat!"

Excellent advice! How many hats there are – and not of music-grinders only – in which we should be delighted to see the button dropped! The next in order is very good, and equally intelligible on this side of the Atlantic. We give the greater part of it: —

THE TREADMILL SONG

"They've built us up a noble wall,To keep the vulgar out;We've nothing in the world to do,But just to walk about;So faster now, you middle men,And try to beat the ends,Its pleasant work to ramble roundAmong one's honest friends.Here, tread upon the long man's toes,He shan't be lazy here —And punch the little fellow's ribs,And tweak that lubber's ear,He's lost them both – don't pull his hair,Because he wears a scratch,But poke him in the further eye,That isn't in the patch.Hark! fellows, there's the supper-bell,And so our work is done;It's pretty sport – suppose we takeA round or two for fun!If ever they should turn me out,When I have better grown,Now hang me, but I mean to haveA treadmill of my own!"

"The September Gale," "The Ballad of an Oysterman," "My Aunt," all solicit admission, but we have no space. A few of the verses "On the Portrait of 'A Gentleman,' in the Athenæum Gallery," we will insert. Perhaps we may see the companion picture to it on the walls of our own Exhibition at Trafalgar Square: —

"It may be so, perhaps thou hastA warm and loving heart;I will not blame thee for thy face,Poor devil as thou art.That thing thou fondly deem'st a nose,Unsightly though it be,In spite of all the cold world's scorn,It may be much to thee.Those eyes, among thine elder friends,Perhaps they pass for blue;No matter – if a man can see,What more have eyes to do?Thy mouth – that fissure in thy face,By something like a chin —May be a very useful placeTo put thy victual in."

Not, it seems, a thing to paint for public inspection. Apropos of the pictorial art, we cannot dismiss Mr Holmes' book without noticing the two or three tasteful vignettes or medallions, or by whatever name the small engravings are to be called, which are scattered through its pages. We wish there were more of them, and that such a style of illustration, or rather of decoration, (for they have little to do with the subject of the text,) were more general. Here are two little children sitting on the ground, one is reading, the other listening – a mere outline, and the whole could be covered by a crown-piece. A simple medallion, such as we have described, gives an exquisite and perpetual pleasure; the blurred and blotched engraving, where much is attempted and nothing completed, is a mere disfigurement to a book. The volume before us, we ought perhaps to add, comes from the press of Messrs Ticknor and Co., Boston.

MY NOVEL; OR, VARIETIES IN ENGLISH LIFE

BY PISISTRATUS CAXTON

BOOK V. – INITIAL CHAPTER

"I hope, Pisistratus," said my father, "that you do not intend to be dull!"

"Heaven forbid, sir! what could make you ask such a question? Intend. No! if I am dull it is from innocence."

"A very long Discourse upon Knowledge!" said my father; "very long. I should cut it out!"

I looked upon my father as a Byzantian sage might have looked on a Vandal. "Cut it out!" —

"Stops the action, sir!" said my father, dogmatically.

"Action! But a novel is not a drama."

"No, it is a great deal longer – twenty times as long, I dare say," replied Mr Caxton with a sigh.

"Well, sir – well! I think my Discourse upon Knowledge has much to do with the subject – is vitally essential to the subject; does not stop the action – only explains and elucidates the action. And I am astonished, sir, that you, a scholar, and a cultivator of knowledge" —

"There – there!" cried my father, deprecatingly. "I yield – I yield. What better could I expect when I set up for a critic! What author ever lived that did not fly into a passion – even with his own father, if his father presumed to say – 'Cut out!' Pacem imploro" —

Mrs Caxton. – "My dear Austin, I am sure Pisistratus did not mean to offend you, and I have no doubt he will take your" —

Pisistratus, (hastily.) – "Advice for the future, certainly. I will quicken the action, and" —

"Go on with the Novel," whispered Roland, looking up from his eternal account-book. "We have lost £200 by our barley!"

Therewith I plunged my pen into the ink, and my thoughts into the "Fair Shadowland."

CHAPTER II

"Halt!" cried a voice; and not a little surprised was Leonard when the stranger who had accosted him the preceding evening got into the chaise.

"Well," said Richard, "I am not the sort of man you expected, eh? Take time to recover yourself." And with these words Richard drew forth a book from his pocket, threw himself back, and began to read. Leonard stole many a glance at the acute, hardy, handsome face of his companion, and gradually recognised a family likeness to poor John, in whom, despite age and infirmity, the traces of no common share of physical beauty were still evident. And, with that quick link in ideas which mathematical aptitude bestows, the young student at once conjectured that he saw before him his uncle Richard. He had the discretion, however, to leave that gentleman free to choose his own time for introducing himself, and silently revolved the new thoughts produced by the novelty of his situation. Mr Richard read with notable quickness – sometimes cutting the leaves of the book with his penknife, sometimes tearing them open with his forefinger, sometimes skipping whole pages altogether. Thus he galloped to the end of the volume – flung it aside – lighted his cigar, and began to talk.

На страницу:
3 из 6