What on Earth is Going On?: A Crash Course in Current Affairs

TOM BAIRD

and ARTHUR HOUSE

What on Earth is Going On?

A Crash Course in Current Affairs

INTRODUCTION

We wrote this book with a shared conviction that a) most people’s knowledge of current affairs is a lot worse than they would like to admit, b) it wouldn’t hurt to start filling in the gaps, and c) while many of these issues are dauntingly complex, they would never-theless benefit from a clear and concise introduction.

Keeping up with the news is an interminably tall order. The media deluge us with so much content each day that by the time we’ve digested the headlines, a new day arrives and we have to start all over again. It’s not surprising that many of us choose to stick our heads in the sand and avoid it completely.

But that’s not the only alternative. The media would have us believe that events of earth-shattering importance happen every single day and that only by remaining glued to the 24-hour news cycle can we have any hope of keeping ourselves informed. Of course this isn’t true. Just as important as keeping up-to-date is understanding the root causes behind issues, and gaining some perspective on how they have developed over time.

Our hope is that What on Earth is Going On? will help achieve this. It is a book for the bedside table, the morning commute or the downstairs loo, where it can be consulted by the confused dinner party guest who has taken refuge from the conversation next door. We hope that they will rejoin the table having flushed away some of their ignorance, and feeling all the better for it.

TOM BAIRD and ARTHUR HOUSE, August 2009

Table of Contents

Cover Page

Title Page

Introduction

Afghanistan

Aid

Al-Qaeda

Banking

Basque Country/ETA

Blogging

Burma

CERN

Chechnya

Civil Liberties

Climate Change

Colombia

Congo

Credit Crunch

Cuba

Darfur

Devolution

Energy

EU

Euthanasia

Fairtrade

Free Trade

G8/G20

Georgia

GM Food

Hedge Funds

Hezbollah

Human Rights

Immigration

Iran

Iraq

Islam

Israel/Palestine

IVF

Kashmir

Kosovo

Microfinance

MRSA

NATO

Neuroscience

NHS

North Korea

Northern Ireland

Nuclear Weapons

Organic Food

Pakistan

Pandemic

Philanthropy

Pirates!

Russia

Social Networking

Sri Lanka

Stem Cells

Stocks and Bonds

Tax

Tibet

UK Elections

UK Political System

UN

US Elections

US Political System

World Bank/IMF

Zimbabwe

Copyright

About the Publisher

Afghanistan

Some basic facts

Afghanistan is one of the world’s poorest countries, the result of decades of war and political instability which have hindered its development and crippled its economy. Its literacy rates are among the lowest in the world (51% for men and 21% for women) and average life expectancy is only 43. Afghanistan’s extensive natural resources (which include copper, gold, iron ore, gemstones, petroleum and natural gas) remain largely untapped. Instead, much of the country’s revenue comes from cultivating poppies, which are used to produce 95% of the world’s heroin. The population of around 32 million is almost entirely Muslim (roughly 80% Sunni, 20% Shi’a—see Islam), but ethnically diverse and multilingual. The most common language is Persian, spoken by around 80% of the population, followed by Pashto, the language of the Pashtun people, who dominate the southern lowlands of the country and constitute its largest ethnic group (42% of the population; groups dominating the centre and northern regions include Tajiks (27%), Hazaras (9%) and Uzbeks (9%)). Afghans usually place their loyalties with their tribe or local clan leader. This, combined with the mountainous and rugged terrain of much of the country, limits the power of state government (the current president Hamid Karzai’s nickname is the ‘Mayor of Kabul’).

Has it always been a war-torn country?

Afghanistan’s importance as a focal point for trade and migration between East and West has seen it possessed and conquered by a host of peoples throughout history, including Arabs, Persians, Turks, Macedonians, Mongols and Mughals. In the 19th century the country was of key strategic importance in the ‘Great Game’ between Russia and the British empire; after several Anglo-Afghan wars, it fell into British hands before regaining independence in 1919. Sixty years later, Afghanistan once again became the pawn in a struggle between two superpowers, this time the Cold War adversaries: the USSR and the USA.

What happened?

In 1979 the CIA began funding the Mujahedeen, an Islamist group composed of diverse factions and local warlords who opposed the communist secular government. The Soviet Red Army intervened to support the government, and were dragged into a decade-long war against the US-sponsored Mujahedeen that Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev referred to as a ‘bleeding wound’. Eventually the dogged resistance and guerrilla tactics of the Mujahedeen forced the Soviets to pull out in 1989. The US lost interest in Afghanistan after the collapse of the USSR, and the country entered a volatile period in which the Mujahedeen ousted the communist government and took control of the capital, Kabul, in 1992. During the ensuing ‘reign of chaos’ a new Islamist group, the Taleban, arose in opposition.

Who are the Taleban?

The Taleban (literally ‘students’) are a strictly religious Sunni movement drawn mainly from the Pashtun ethnic group. They originated in the madrassas (Islamic schools) of the southern city of Kandahar under the leadership of Mullah Omar, a one-eyed veteran of the Soviet war. The Taleban started making war on the Mujahedeen with the intention of restoring stability to Afghanistan and implementing Sharia law (see Islam). When they stormed Kabul in late 1996 they were greeted as heroes and bringers of peace, but they soon imposed an austere religious regime which required that all ‘modern distractions’ from the teachings of Islam were banned. These included music, TV, card playing, dancing, high heels, kite-flying, football and even paper bags. Women were forced to go completely covered in the street, and were not allowed jobs, being expected to stay at home instead. In 1996 the Taleban provided a safe haven in Afghanistan for Osama bin Laden and his fellow al-Qaeda members (see Al-Qaeda). Several of these, including bin Laden, already had contacts in the Taleban (having fought with them in Afghanistan against the Soviets) and shared their fundamentalist beliefs.

What happened after 9/11?

A month after the attacks, on 7 October 2001, George W. Bush launched Operation Enduring Freedom in response to the Taleban’s refusal to surrender bin Laden. This was an offensive launched with the UK which aimed to capture bin Laden, destroy al-Qaeda, and remove the Taleban regime. With the help of the Northern Alliance (former Mujahedeen militias also known as the United Islamic Front), the Taleban were successfully expelled from Kabul and Kandahar in November 2001. An interim government under Hamid Karzai, made up mainly of Northern Alliance members, was set up in early 2002. The US and UK military were joined by the ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) established in December 2001 and deployed under the approval of the UN Security Council. Led by NATO since 2003, this now consists of over 58,000 troops from 42 different countries, of which 26,000 are American and 8,000 British. The coalition also began training a new Afghan National Army to help fight the insurgents, which by mid-2009 numbered 86,000.

How successful have the coalition forces been?

Although eight years have passed since the US/ISAF invasion, bin Laden is still alive and al-Qaeda are functioning to some extent in the tribal areas beyond the Pakistan border, where multiple Islamist groups have made their bases and training camps. Despite being ousted from power in 2001, the Taleban regrouped and fought back with a new insurgency from 2003-5 which was particularly prevalent in their heartland, namely the southern provinces of Helmand and Kandahar as well as central Oruzgan. Having emerged as a distinctly Afghan movement, the Taleban’s ranks have swelled in the last few years due to Pakistani recruits joining the cause in the name of jihad (see Islam). Although the Taleban forces are estimated at only 10,000, their guerrilla tactics (and terrorist methods including suicide bombing) are extremely hard for conventional armies to counter, and the coalition forces face similar difficulties to those experienced by the Soviet army in the 1980s. Their success will depend not on military victories but on winning the ‘hearts and minds’ of the people, stamping out heroin production (the Taleban briefly banned poppy cultivation in 2000 but since the 2001 invasion it has been their main source of funding), and co-operating with Pakistan to rid its tribal areas of Taleban, al-Qaeda and other Islamist militant groups.

In March 2009 Barack Obama laid out his plans for a ‘comprehensive strategy’ for Afghanistan and Pakistan. This involved establishing a ‘trilateral dialogue’ between the US and these two countries, sending in more troops in the short term to root out ‘high-level terrorist targets’, and channelling financial and infrastructural resources to the area that had previously been going to Iraq. Obama’s policy is a hybrid of focused counter-terrorism and broader counter-insurgency, and some commentators doubt its ability to achieve both aims.

What other problems face Afghanistan?

A ruined economy and infrastructure, a weak government, an unpopular president, a corrupt police force, widespread human rights abuses (particularly against women and girls) and a poor education system.

‘We’ll smoke ‘em out of their holes.’

GEORGE W. BUSH, 15 September 2001

‘We are not in Afghanistan to control that country or to dictate its future. We are in Afghanistan to confront a common enemy that threatens the United States, our friends and allies, and the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan who have suffered the most at the hands of violent extremists.’

BARACK OBAMA, 27 March 2009

Aid

What is aid?

Aid (also called international aid or foreign aid) is the voluntary transfer of resources from one country to another. Aid may be bilateral, given directly from one country to another, or multilateral, dispensed via international organisations such as the World Bank, IMF (see World Bank/IMF) and European Development Fund, or via charities or NGOs (non-governmental organisations) such as Oxfam, ActionAid or Médecins Sans Frontières. Most types of aid fall into two categories: humanitarian aid and development aid.

What is humanitarian aid?

This is emergency aid supplied to alleviate suffering in the immediate aftermath of a war or a natural disaster. It often involves the provision of food, medicine, transport, temporary housing (e.g. refugee camps) and logistical support (management of the flow of supplies and information).

What is development aid?

Development aid (or development assistance) is a much bigger sector than humanitarian aid, requiring far more money, as it focuses on helping extremely poor countries develop economically and socially in the long term. This can involve improving infrastructure, building schools and medical centres, providing clean water supplies, tackling the effects of climate change in vulnerable countries (see Climate Change), enabling access to anti-retroviral drugs, setting up microfinance initiatives (see Microfinance), providing financial grants, loans, or debt forgiveness grants, and donating skills and expertise in many different areas. In the long run, development schemes aim to help poor countries become self-sufficient, well governed, safe and economically prosperous.

Which countries supply the most aid?

The world’s principal aid donors are the 22 rich DAC (Development Assistance Committee) states of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Of these, the USA, Germany, France and UK give the most aid in real terms, but as a percentage of Gross National Product (GNP) they give less than the 0.7% demanded by the UN in order to meet the Millennium Development Goals. In fact, most DAC countries are lagging behind on an average of 0.47% of GNP—the only countries doing better than the 0.7% target, and therefore the most generous donors in relative terms, are Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands. In 2005, wealthy countries pledged to step up their aid donations at the G8 summit at Gleneagles, and also agreed to write off US$40 billion worth of debt owed by 18 HIPC (Highly Indebted Poor Countries) to the World Bank, IMF and African Development Fund. Since then the UK has made good on its commitments to increase aid, and this looks set to continue despite the economic crisis, with Alistair Darling’s 2009 Budget pledging to deliver 0.6% of GNP by 2010-11 and reach the UN target of 0.7% in 2013.

What are the Millennium Development Goals?

These are a set of eight international development goals to be met by 2015 which grew out of the United Nations Millennium Declaration signed in September 2000. All 192 UN member countries and over 23 international organisations agreed to meet these ambitious goals, which were: eradicating extreme poverty and hunger (halving the number of people that live on less than a dollar a day); ensuring all children receive primary education; eliminating gender disparity at all educational levels; reducing by two-thirds the mortality rate of children under five; improving maternal health; halting and reversing the spread of AIDS, malaria and other diseases (and ensuring universal access to AIDS treatment by 2010); ensuring environmental sustainability and establishing a global partnership for development. Progress towards meeting these goals has been steady in Asia and South America, but sub-Saharan Africa is falling well short and some of its countries are unlikely to meet any of them. Despite a falling number of armed conflicts, Africa is still rife with disease, poverty and weak governance and remains the biggest focus and challenge for development programmes today.

How does the UK government spend its aid budget?

This is handled by DFID (the Department for International Development), a branch of the government with its own Secretary of State (currently Douglas Alexander MP). In 2007/8, 57% of DFID’s programme was spent on bilateral aid, both development and humanitarian—the largest recipients of bilateral development assistance were India, Ethiopia and Tanzania, whereas the largest humanitarian aid channels were to the Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Iraq (see Darfur, Congo and Iraq); roughly 10% of bilateral assistance went to UK Civil Society Organisations such as the British Red Cross, VSO (Voluntary Services Overseas) and Oxfam; 38% of DFID’s programme went on multilateral aid, chiefly to the European Commission’s Development Fund, followed by the World Bank and the United Nations.

How effective is aid?

There are plenty of success stories that testify to the effectiveness of aid in saving the lives of poor people, particularly those suffering from diseases; for example in Morocco, cases of blinding trachoma—a bacterial eye infection—have fallen 75% since 1999 thanks to a massive donation of antibiotics from a pharmaceutical company; in China, a World Bank loan financed a tuberculosis project which is now saving an estimated 30,000 lives per year; and in Uganda and Malawi, anti-retroviral drugs issued by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria have kept hundreds of thousands of HIV/AIDS sufferers alive since 2001 who would otherwise have died. However, there are many cases where aid has not reached its intended target, or has been hampered by poor planning, corrupt governments in recipient countries or war. In 2007, the fighting in southern Afghanistan made it too dangerous for DFID to deliver much-needed food aid to thousands of starving people, which only increased local support for the Taleban insurgents. Beyond the effectiveness of delivering food or medicine, the effectiveness of development aid is difficult to measure and is a matter of some controversy.

Why?

On the face of it, richer countries helping poorer countries seems like a straightforwardly good thing. And it is true that if all aid were suddenly to stop, millions of people around the world would suffer as a result. However, there is an ongoing debate surrounding the long-term effects of aid on developing countries. It often centres on the fact that aid is seldom given for purely altruistic reasons, but usually comes with strings attached. Aid programmes were started in earnest during the Cold War by the USA/NATO and the Soviet Union as a way of fostering alliances with weaker countries and influencing their politics with capitalist or communist ideology. Since the collapse of communism, the World Bank and the IMF have been accused of being run (at least in part) by people with vested business interests who use aid programmes to open up new opportunities for global capitalism in developing countries. Some say this sort of ‘neo-colonialism’ leads to exploitation and benefits the corporations more than the countries concerned, whereas others argue that aid creates a dependence on the donor countries, and that increased trade is instead the key to sustainable development—hence the slogan ‘trade not aid’. The OECD estimates that 58% of all foreign aid is ‘tied aid’—consisting of bilateral agreements in which money has to be spent in the donor country, thereby increasing the donor country’s exports and exerting its political influence over the recipient country. Tied aid is also less efficient than ‘untied’ aid, increasing costs for the recipient country by around 20%, much of which is spent on paying the high wages of international consultants. Aid has also been criticised for sustaining weak or corrupt governments; with a steady stream of unearned revenue at their disposal, they do not need to rely on the taxes of their citizens, who thus lose the ability to hold them accountable. Alternatively, it might allow such governments to free up funds to spend on potentially dubious areas such as defence, while the essential needs of their people are left to aid programmes.

‘Millions in Africa are poorer today because of aid; misery and poverty have not ended but have increased.’

DAMBISA MOYO, Zambian economist and author of Dead Aid

‘Development assistance based on proven technologies and directed at measurable and practical needs—increased food production, disease control, safe water and sanitation, schoolrooms and clinics, roads, power grids, Internet connectivity, and the like—has a distinguished record of success.’

JEFFREY D. SACHS, American economist, Special Advisor to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and author of Common Wealth and The End of Poverty

Al-Qaeda

What is it?

Al-Qaeda (meaning ‘the Base’) is an international Sunni Islamist movement founded in 1988 by the Saudi Arabian Osama bin Laden. Since 1992 it has carried out terrorist attacks on civilian and military targets across the world in an extreme interpretation of jihad (see Islam), the Islamic doctrine of holy struggle. Most devastatingly, it was responsible for the attacks

on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on 11 September 2001, which claimed around 3,000 lives and injured 6,300.

How is it run?

The command structure and operational methods of al-Qaeda are a matter of some debate. Al-Qaeda has been known to operate cells (small groups of clandestine agents) in Western cities and to have local networks across the Muslim world (in Iraq and North Africa, for example). However, the extent to which these regional representatives are controlled by the central leadership is disputed; some claim that al-Qaeda is a coherent militant organisation, while others see it as a loosely defined concept, with a few core members providing ideology and inspiration for followers around the world. Despite this uncertainty, the ‘destruction of al-Qaeda’ was a key aim of George W. Bush’s ‘War on Terror’ and the US invasion of Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks. What is left of al-Qaeda today is unclear, but its leaders are believed to be hiding in Pakistan’s tribal areas next to the Afghan border, where several other jihadi groups are based. Al-Qaeda is known to share training camps with these groups, such as the Pakistani-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, as well as fostering contacts with other militant Islamist movements such as the South-East Asian Jemaah Islamiyah.

What are al-Qaeda’s aims and beliefs?

Al-Qaeda aims to remove foreign, especially Western, influence from Muslim countries and establish a new Caliphate (an Islamic empire based on Sharia law—see Islam) across the Muslim world. Bin Laden and his followers are thought to be heavily influenced by the writings of Sayyid Qutb, a mid-20th-century Egyptian Islamist intellectual who

Apart from 9/11, which other attacks have been attributed to al-Qaeda?

1992: Hotel bombings in Aden, Yemen (2 killed, 7 injured)

1993: First World Trade Center bombing, New York, USA (6 killed, 1,042 injured)

1998: US Embassy bombings in Nairobi, Kenya (212 killed, around 4,000 injured) and Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania (11 killed, 85 injured)

2000: Attack on the USS Cole, Aden harbour, Yemen (19 killed, 39 injured)

2003: Truck bombings in Istanbul, Turkey (57 killed, 700 injured)