Sea Power in its Relations to the War of 1812. Volume 1

192

That is, all vessels, including merchantmen.

193

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. pp. 183-185. Author's italics.

194

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. pp. 191-193.

195

American State Papers, vol. iii. pp. 199, 200.

196

American State Papers, vol. iii. p. 202. Author's italics.

197

Ibid., Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 201.

198

Ibid., p. 202.

199

Ibid., p. 203.

200

The principal part of the correspondence between Rose and Madison will be found in American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. pp. 213-220. Rose's instructions from Canning were first published by Mr. Henry Adams, History of the United States, vol. iv. pp. 178-182. They were of a character that completely justify the caution of the American Government in refusing to go further without knowing their contents, concerning which, indeed, Madison wrote that a glimpse had been obtained in the informal interviews, which showed their inadmissibility. Madison to Pinkney, Feb. 19, 1808, U.S. State Department MSS.

201

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 300.

202

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 200.

203

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 243.

204

Ibid., pp. 244-245.

205

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 243.

206

Armstrong to Smith, U.S. Secretary of State, Jan. 28, 1810. Ibid., p. 380. Author's italics.

207

American State Papers, vol. iii. p. 380. Author's italics.

208

Barlow to Bassano, Nov. 10, 1811. U.S. State Department MSS. Author's italics.

209

Barlow to Monroe, Dec. 19, 1811. U.S. State Department MSS.

210

Feb. 22, 1808. American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 206.

211

Giles, Annals of Congress, 1808-09, pp. 123-125.

212

N.Y. Evening Post, May 12, 1808.

213

Jefferson, under date of Nov. 15, 1807, alludes to such a report. (Jefferson's Works, vol. v. p. 211.) Already, indeed, on Aug. 19, 1807, an Order in Council, addressed to vessels bearing the neutral flags of Mecklenburg, Oldenburg, Papenburg, or Kniphausen, had been issued, which, though brief, imposed precisely the same restrictions as the later celebrated ones here under discussion. (Annual Register, 1807, State Papers, p. 730; Naval Chronicle, vol. xviii. p. 151.) The fact is interesting, as indicative of the date of formulating a project, for the execution of which the "Horizon" decision probably afforded the occasion.

214

Erskine's communication was dated Feb. 23, 1808. (American State Papers, vol. iii. p. 209.) Pinkney, however, had forwarded a copy of the Orders on November 17. (Ibid., p. 203.) Canning's letter, of which Erskine's was a transcript, was dated Dec. 1, 1807. (British Foreign Office Archives.)

215

Senator Giles of Virginia. Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 218.

216

The following are instances: Philadelphia, February 23. The ship "Venus," King, hence to the Isle of France, has returned to port. January 17, Lat. 25° N., Long. 34° W., fell in with an English merchant fleet of thirty-six sail, under convoy of four ships of war. Was boarded by the sloop of war "Wanderer," which endorsed on all her papers, forbidding to enter any port belonging to France or her allies, they all being declared in a state of blockade. Captain King therefore put back. (N.Y. Evening Post, Feb. 24, 1808.) Salem, Mass., February 23. Arrived bark "Active," Richardson. Sailed hence for Malaga, December 12. January 2, Lat. 37° N., Long. 17° W., boarded by a British cruiser, and papers endorsed against entering any but a British port. The voyage being thus frustrated, Captain Richardson returned. Marblehead, February 29. Schooner "Minerva" returned, having been captured under the Orders in Council, released, and come home. Ship "George," from Amsterdam, arrived at New York, March 6, via Yarmouth. Was taken by an English cruiser into Yarmouth and there cleared. (Evening Post, March 6.)

217

N.Y. Evening Post, March 24, 1808.

218

Letter of John Quincy Adams to Harrison Gray Otis.

219

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 245. Author's italics.

220

Correspondence of Thomas Barclay, p. 272.

221

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 206.

222

"We expected, too, some effect from coercion of interest." (Jefferson to Armstrong, March 5, 1809. Works, vol. v. p. 433.) "The embargo is the last card we have to play short of war." (Jefferson to Madison, March 11, 1808. Ibid., p. 258.) "The coercive experiment we have made." (Monroe to John Taylor. Works, vol. v. p. 89.) "I place immense value on the experiment being fully made how far an Embargo may be an effectual weapon in future, as well as on this occasion." (Jefferson. Works, vol. v. p. 289.) "Bonaparte ought to be particularly satisfied with us, by whose unyielding adherence to principle England has been forced into the revocation of her Orders." (Jefferson to Madison, April 27, 1809. Works, vol. v. p. 442.) This revocation was not actual, but a mistake of the British minister at Washington. "I have always understood that there were two objects contemplated by the Embargo Laws. The first, precautionary; the second, coercive, operating upon the aggressive belligerents, by addressing strong appeals to the interests of both." (Giles of Virginia, in Senate, Nov. 24, 1808.) "The embargo is not designed to affect our own citizens, but to make an impression in Europe." (Williams of South Carolina, in House of Representatives, April 14, 1808.)

223

The writer, in a previous work (Sea Power in the French Revolution), believes himself to have shown that the losses by capture of British traders did not exceed two and one half per cent.

224

Letter to Otis.

225

To Thomas Paine, concerning an improved gunboat devised by him. Sept. 6, 1807. (Jefferson's Works, vol. v. p. 189.)

226

Jefferson's Works, vol. v. pp. 417, 426.

227

June 14, 1809. Works, vol. v. p. 455.

228

An American ship putting into England, leaky, reported that on Dec. 18, 1807, she had been boarded by a French privateer, which allowed her to proceed because bound to Holland. The French captain said he had captured four Americans, all sent into Passage, in Spain; and that his orders were to bring in all Americans bound to English ports. (N.Y. Evening Post, March 1, 1808.) This was under the Berlin Decree, as that of Milan issued only December 17. The Berlin Decree proclaimed the British Islands under blockade, but Napoleon for a time reserved decision as to the mere act of sailing for them being an infringement. Mr. James Stephen, in Parliament, stated that in 1807 several ships, not less than twenty-one, he thought, were taken for the mere fact of sailing between America and England; in consequence, insurance on American vessels rose 50 per cent, from 2-½ to 3-¾. (Parliamentary Debates, vol. xiii. p. xxxix. App.) In the Evening Post of March 3, 1808, will be found, quoted from a French journal, cases of four vessels carried into France, apparently only because bound to England.

229

Henry Adams's History of the United States, vol. v. p. 242.

230

"Nothing can establish firmly the republican principles of our government but an establishment of them in England. France will be the apostle for this." (Jefferson's Works, vol. iv. p. 192.) "The subjugation of England would be a general calamity. Happily it is impossible. Should invasion end in her being only republicanized, I know not on what principles a true republican of our country could lament it." (Ibid., p. 217; Feb. 23, 1798.)

231

Jefferson to Richard M. Johnson, March 10, 1808. Works, vol. v. p. 257.

232

London Times of August 6, quoted in N.Y. Evening Post of Oct. 10, 1808.

233

Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 1032.

234

Captains' Letters, U.S. Navy Department MSS. Jan. 11, 1808.

235

Thomas Barclay's Correspondence, p. 274. Author's italics.

236

N.Y. Evening Post, Sept. 1, 1808.

237

Cobbett's Parliamentary Debates, vol. xii. p. 326.

238

Life of Sir William Parker, vol. i. p. 304.

239

Barlow to Bassano, Nov. 10, 1811. U.S. State Department MSS.

240

N.Y. Evening Post, Feb. 18, June 30, 1808; Feb. 24, 1809.

241

Senator White of Delaware. Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 52.

242

Works, vol. v. p. 336.

243

"Trinidad, July 1, 1808. We have just received 15,000 barrels of flour from Passamaquoddy, and not a week passes but some drops in from Philadelphia, Norfolk, etc. Cargo of 1,000 barrels would not now command more than twelve dollars; a year ago, eighteen." (N.Y. Evening Post, July 25.)

244

N.Y. Evening Post, Jan. 17, 1809.

245

Ibid., February 6.

246

Mitchill of N.Y. Annals of Congress, 1808-09, pp. 86, 92.

247

Jefferson's Works, vol. v. pp. 298, 318.

248

N.Y. Evening Post, Aug. 31, 1808.

249

Feb. 17, 1812. Captains' Letters, U.S. Navy Department MSS.

250

American State Papers, Finance, vol. ii. p. 306.

251

With flour varying at short intervals from $30 to $18, and $12, a barrel, it is evident that speculation must be rife, and also that only general statements can be made as to conditions over any length of time.

252

Orchard Cook, of Massachusetts, said in the House of Representatives that 590 vessels sailed thus by permission. Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 1250.

253

N.Y. Evening Post, Oct. 3, 1808.

254

Ibid., Sept. 2, 1808.

255

N.Y. Evening Post, Feb. 28, 1809.

256

Ibid., Sept. 21, 1808.

257

Ibid., Dec. 8, 1808.

258

Cobbett's Parliamentary Debates, vol. xii. p. 1194.

259

Lord Grenville in House of Lords. Ibid., p. 780.

260

N.Y. Evening Post, June 28, 1808.

261

Ibid., April 8.

262

Ibid., June 28.

263

Ibid., October 27. The same effect, though on a much smaller scale, was seen in France. Deprived, through the joint operation of the embargo and the Orders in Council, of colonial produce brought by Americans, a number of vessels were fitted out, and armed as letters of marque, to carry on this trade. These adventures were very successful, though they by no means filled the void caused by the absence of American carriers. See Evening Post of Dec. 29, 1808, and March 22 and 28, 1809. One of these, acting on her commission as a letter of marque, captured an American brig, returning from India, which was carried into Cayenne and there condemned under the Milan Decree. Ibid., Dec. 6, 1808.

264

N.Y. Evening Post, Nov. 23, 1808.

265

For some instances see: Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 428; N.Y. Evening Post, Feb. 5, 8, 12; May 13; Aug. 26; Sept. 27, 1808. Gallatin, in a report dated Dec. 10, 1808, said, "At no time has there been so much specie, so much redundant unemployed capital in the country;" scarcely a token of prosperity in so new a country. (American State Papers, Finance, vol. ii. p. 309.)

266

American State Papers, Finance, vol. ii. pp. 307, 373, 442. The second figure is an average of the two years, 1808, 1809, within which fell the fifteen months of embargo.

267

Ibid., p. 309 (Dec. 10, 1808).

268

"The schooner 'John,' Clayton, from La Guayra, with two hundred thousand pounds of coffee, has been seized at Leghorn, and it was expected would be condemned under the Bayonne Decree. The 'John' sailed from Baltimore for La Guayra, by permission, under the fourth supplementary Embargo Act. By some means or other she found her way to Leghorn, where it was vainly hoped she might safely dispose of her cargo." (N.Y. Evening Post, Dec. 20, 1808.) "The frigate 'Chesapeake,' Captain Decatur, cruising in support of the embargo, captured off Block Island the brig 'Mount Vernon' and the ship 'John' loaded with provisions. Of these the former, at least, is expressly stated to have cleared 'in ballast,' by permission." (Ibid., Aug. 15, 1808.)

269

Two or three quotations are sufficient to illustrate a condition notorious at the time. "Jamaica. Nine Americans came with the June fleet, (from England) with full cargoes. At first it was thought these vessels would not be allowed to take cargoes, (because contrary to Navigation Act); but a little reflection taught the Government better. Rum is the surplus crop of Jamaica, and to keep on hand that which they do not want is too much our way (i.e. embargo). The British admiral granted these vessels convoy without hesitation, which saved them from five to seven and one half percent in insurance." (N.Y. Evening Post, Aug. 2, 1808.) "Gibraltar. A large number of American vessels are in these seas, sailing under license from Great Britain, to and from ports of Spain, without interruption. Our informant sailed in company with eight or ten, laden with wine and fruit for England." (Ibid., June 30.) Senator Hillhouse, of Connecticut: "Many of our vessels which were out when the embargo was laid have remained out. They have been navigating under the American flag, and have been constantly employed, at vast profit." (Annals of Congress, 1808, p. 172.)

270

"At Gibraltar, between January 1 and April 15, eight vessels were sent in for breach of the Orders, of which seven were condemned." (N.Y. Evening Post, May 25, 1808.) "Baltimore, Sept. 30. 1808. Arrived brig. 'Sophia' from Rotterdam, July 28, via Harwich, England. Boarded by British brig 'Phosphorus', and ordered to England. After arrival, cargo (of gin) gauged, and a duty exacted of eight pence sterling per gallon. Allowed to proceed, with a license, after paying duty. In company with the 'Sophia', and sent in with her, were three vessels bound for New York, with similar cargoes." (Ibid., Oct. 3.) "American ship 'Othello,' from New York for Nantes, with assorted cargo. Ship, with thirty hogsheads of sugar condemned on ground of violating blockade;" i.e. Orders in Council. (Naval Chronicle, vol. xx. p. 62.) Besides the 'Othello' there are two other cases, turning on the Orders, by compliance or evasion. From France came numerous letters announcing condemnations of vessels, because boarded by British cruisers. (N.Y. Evening Post, Sept. 10, Oct. 5, Oct. 27, Dec. 6, Dec. 10, 1808; March 17, 1809.) Proceedings were sometimes even more peremptory. More than one American vessel, though neutral, was burned or sunk at sea, as amenable under Napoleon's decrees. (Ibid., Nov. 3 and Nov. 5, Dec. 10, 1808.) See also affidavits in the case of the "Brutus", burned, and of the "Bristol Packet", scuttled. (Ibid., April 5 and April 7, 1808.)

271

Hillhouse in the Senate (Annals of Congress, 1808, p. 172), and Cook, of Massachusetts, in the House. "Of about five hundred and ninety which sailed, only eight or ten have been captured." (Ibid., 1808-09, p. 1250.) Yet many went to Guadaloupe and other forbidden French islands. At Saint Pierre, Martinique, in the middle of September, were nearly ninety American vessels. "Flour, which had been up to fifty dollars per barrel, fell to thirty dollars, in consequence of the number of arrivals from America." (N.Y. Evening Post, Sept. 20, 1808.) This shows how the permission to sail "in ballast" was abused.

272

N.Y. Evening Post, Sept. 7, 1808.

273

N.Y. Evening Post, Sept. 7, 1808.

274

Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 406.

275

N.Y. Evening Post, May 4 and 13, 1808.

276

N.Y. Evening Post, May 4 and 13, 1808.

277

For the text of the Act see Annals of Congress, 1808-09, pp. 1798-1803.

278

Ibid., p. 233.

279

Giles of Virginia. Annals of Congress, 1808-09, pp. 353-381.

280

Williams of South Carolina. Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 1236.

281

Nelson of Maryland. Annals of Congress, 1808-09, p. 1258.

282

Annals of Congress, 1808-09, pp. 1438-1439.

283

Monroe to Jefferson, Jan. 18 and Feb. 2, 1809. Monroe's Works, vol. v. pp. 91, 93-95.

284

To John Taylor, January 9. Ibid., p. 89.

285

Pinkney, in connection with these, speaks of the "expected" Act of Congress. American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 299.

286

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 299.

287

This sentence was omitted in the papers when submitted to Congress.

288

State Papers, p. 300.

289

February 7, 1810. American State Papers, Commerce and Navigation, vol. i. p. 812.

290

The correspondence between Erskine and the Secretary of State on this occasion is in American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. pp. 295-297.

291

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. pp. 304-308.

292

Ibid., p. 303.

293

Ibid.

294

Ibid., p. 301.

295

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 241.

296

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 318.

297

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. pp. 308-319.

298

Author's italics.

299

See Madison's Works, vol. ii. p. 499.

300

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. 319-322.

301

The italics in this quotation (American State Papers, vol. iii. p. 300) are introduced by the author, to draw attention to the words decisive to be noted.

302

The italics are Smith's. They serve exactly, however, to illustrate just wherein consists the perverseness of omission (the words "operation of"), and the misstatement of this remarkable passage.

303

Secretary Smith subsequently stated that this sentence was added by express interposition of the President. (Smith's Address to the American people.)

304

Canning in his instructions to Jackson (No. 1, July 1, 1809, Foreign Office MSS.) wrote: "The United States cannot have believed that such an arrangement as Mr. Erskine consented to accept was conformable to his instructions. If Mr. Erskine availed himself of the liberty allowed to him of communicating those instructions in the affair of the Orders in Council, they must have known that it was not so." My italics.

305

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 352.

306

Writings of James Madison. Published by Order of Congress, 1865. Vol. ii. p. 439.

307

Ibid., p. 440. Turreau was the French minister.

308

Works of Jefferson, vol. v. pp. 442-445.

309

"When Lord Wellesley's answer speaks of the offence imputed to Jackson, it does not say he gave no such cause of offence, but simply relied on his repeated asseverations that he did not mean to offend." Pinkney to Madison, Aug. 13, 1810. Wheaton's Life of Pinkney, p. 446.

310

Annals of Congress, 1809-10.

311

Ibid., January 8, 1810, pp. 1164, 1234.

312

Ibid., p. 1234.

313

Annals of Congress, 1809-10, pp. 754, 755.

314

Ibid., pp. 606, 607.

315

Annals of Congress, 1810, p. 2582.

316

For Armstrong's letter and the text of the Decree, see American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 384.

317

Armstrong to Champagny, March 10, 1810. American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 382.

318

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 362.

319

Ibid., p. 385.

320

Ibid.

321

The Secretary of State to Armstrong, June 5, 1810. American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 385.

322

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 386.

323

Ibid., p. 387.

324

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 364.

325

Ibid., p. 365.

326

Jefferson to Madison, April 27, 1809. Works, vol. v. p. 442.

327

Correspondance de Napoléon. Napoleon to Champagny, July 31, and August 2, 1810, vol. xx. p. 644, and vol. xxi. p. 1.

328

American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 209. Author's italics.

329

Canning to Erskine, Dec. 1, 1807, transmitting the Orders in Council of November 11. British Foreign Office MSS.

330

Monroe to Foster, Oct. 1, 1811. American State Papers, Foreign Relations, vol. iii. p. 445. See also, more particularly, ibid., pp. 440, 441.

331

U.S. State Department MSS., and State Papers, vol. iii. p. 250.

332