Fragments of Earth Lore: Sketches & Addresses Geological and Geographical

Geographically the Asiatic coasts of the Pacific offer a strong contrast to those of the American borders. The latter, as we have seen, are for the most part not far removed from the edge of the continental plateau. The coasts of the mainland of Asia, on the other hand, retire to a great distance, the true margin of the plateau being marked out by that great chain of islands which extends from Kamchatka south to the Philippines and New Guinea. The seas lying between those islands and the mainland occupy depressions in the continental plateau. Were that plateau to be lifted up for 6000 or 7000 feet the seas referred to would be enclosed by continuous land, and all the principal islands of the East Indian Archipelago – Sumatra, Java, Celebes, and New Guinea, would become united to themselves as well as to Australia and New Zealand. In short, it is the relatively depressed condition of the continental plateau along the western borders of the Pacific basin that causes the Asiatic coast-lines to differ so strikingly from those of America.

From a geological point of view the differences are less striking than the resemblances. It is true that we have as yet a very imperfect knowledge of the geological structure of eastern Asia, but we know enough to justify the conclusion that in its main features that region does not differ essentially from western North America. During Mesozoic and Cainozoic times the sea appears to have overflowed vast tracts of Manchooria and China, and even to have penetrated into what is now the great Desert of Gobi. Subsequent crustal movements revolutionised the geography of all those regions. Great ranges of linear uplifts came into existence, and in these the younger formations, together with the foundations on which they rested, were squeezed into folds and ridged up against the nuclei of Palæozoic and Archæan rocks which had hitherto formed the only dry land. The latest of these grand upheavals are of Tertiary age, and, like those of the Pacific slope of America, they were accompanied by excessive volcanic action. The long chains of islands that flank the shores of Asia we must look upon as a series of partially submerged or partially emerged mountain-ranges, analogous geographically to the coast-ranges of North and Central America, and to the youngest Cordilleras of South America. The presence of numerous active and recently extinct volcanoes, taken in connection with the occurrence of many great depressions which furrow the floor of the sea in the East Indian Archipelago, and the profound depths attained by the Pacific trough along the borders of Japan and the Kurile and Aleutian Islands – all indicate conditions of very considerable instability of the lithosphere. We are not surprised, therefore, to meet with much apparently conflicting evidence of elevation and depression in the coast-lands of eastern Asia, where in some places the sea would seem to be encroaching, while in other regions it is retreating. In all earthquake-ridden and volcanic areas such irregular coastal changes may be looked for. So extreme are the irregularities of the sea-floor in the area lying between Australia, the Solomon Islands, the New Hebrides, and New Zealand, and so great are the depths attained by many of the depressions, that the margins of the continental plateau are harder to trace here than anywhere else in the world. The bottom of the oceanic trough throughout a large portion of the southern and western Pacific is, in fact, traversed by many great mountain-ridges, the summits of which approach the surface again and again to form the numerous islets of Polynesia. But notwithstanding the considerable depths that separate Australia from New Zealand there is geological evidence to show that a land-connection formerly linked both to Asia. The continental plateau, therefore, must be held to include New Caledonia and New Zealand. Hence the volcanic islets of the Solomon and New Hebrides groups are related to Australia in the same way as the Liu-kiu, Japanese, and Kurile Islands are to Asia.

Having rapidly sketched the more prominent features of the Pacific coast-lines, we are in a position to realise the remarkable contrast they present to the coast-lines of the Atlantic. The highly-folded strata of the Atlantic sea-board are the relics of great mountains of upheaval, the origin of which cannot be assigned to a more recent date than Palæozoic times. During subsequent crustal movements no mountains of corrugated strata were uplifted along the Atlantic margins, the Mesozoic and Cainozoic strata of the coastal regions showing little or no disturbance. It is quite in keeping with all this that volcanic action appears to have been most strongly manifested in Palæozoic times. So many long ages have passed since the upheaval of the Archæan and Palæozoic mountains of the Atlantic sea-board that these heights have everywhere lost the character of true mountains of elevation. Planed down to low levels, partially submerged and covered to some extent by newer formations, they have in many places been again converted into dry lands, forming plateaux – now sorely denuded and cut up into mountains and valleys of erosion. Why the later movements along the borders of the Atlantic basin should not have resulted in the wholesale plication of the younger sedimentary rocks is a question for geologists. It would seem as if the Atlantic margins had reached a stage of comparative stability long before the grand Tertiary uplifts of the Pacific borders had taken place; for, as we have seen, the Mesozoic and the Cainozoic strata of the Atlantic coast-lands show little or no trace of having been subjected to tangential thrusting and crushing. Hence one cannot help suspecting that the retreat of the sea during Mesozoic and Cainozoic ages may have been due rather to subsidence of the oceanic trough and to sedimentation within the continental area than to positive elevation of the land.

Over the Pacific trough, likewise, depression has probably been in progress more or less continuously since Palæozoic times, and this movement alone must have tended to withdraw the sea from the surface of the continental plateau in Asia and America. But by far the most important coastal changes in those regions have been brought about by the crumpling-up of the plateau, and the formation of gigantic mountains of upheaval along its margins. From remotest geological periods down almost to the present, the land-area has been increased from time to time by the doubling-up and consequent elevation of coastal accumulations, and by the eruption of vast masses of volcanic materials. It is this long-continued activity of the plutonic forces within the Pacific area which has caused the coast-lands of that basin to contrast so strongly with those of the Atlantic. The latter are incomparably older than the former – the heights of the Atlantic borders being mountains of denudation of vast geological antiquity, while the coastal ranges of the Pacific slope are creations but of yesterday as it were. It may well be that those Cordilleras and mountain-chains reach a greater height than was ever attained by any Palæozoic uplifts of the Atlantic borders. But the marked disparity in elevation between the coast-lands of the Pacific and the Atlantic is due chiefly to a profound difference in age. Had the Pacific coast-lands existed for as long a period and suffered as much erosion as the ancient rocks of the Atlantic sea-board, they would now have little elevation to boast of.

The coast-lines of the Indian Ocean are not, upon the whole, far removed from the margin of the continental plateau. The elevation of East Africa for 6000 feet would add only a narrow belt to the land. This would still leave Madagascar an island, but there are geological reasons for concluding that this island was at a far distant period united to Africa, and it must therefore be considered as forming a portion of the continental plateau. The great depths which now separate it from the mainland are probably due to local subsidence, connected with volcanic action in Madagascar itself and in the Comoro Islands. The southern coasts of Asia, like those of East Africa, approach the edge of the continental plateau, so that an elevation of 6000 feet would make little addition to the land-area. With the same amount of upheaval, however, the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Java, and West Australia would become united, but without extending much further seawards. Land-connection, as we know, existed in Mesozoic times between Asia, Australia, and New Zealand, but the coast-lines of that distant period must have differed considerably from those that would appear were the regions in question to experience now a general elevation. The Archæan and the Palæozoic rocks of the Malay Peninsula and Sumatra are flanked on the side of the Indian Ocean by great volcanic ridges, and by uplifts of Tertiary strata, which continue along the line of the Nicobar and the Andaman Islands into Burma. Thus the coast-lines of that section of the Indian Ocean exhibit a geographical development similar to that of the Pacific sea-board. Elsewhere, as in Hindustan, Arabia, and East Africa, the coast-lines appear to have been determined chiefly by regional elevations of the land or subsidence of the oceanic trough in Mesozoic and Cainozoic times, accompanied by the out-welling of enormous floods of lava. Seeing, then, that the Pacific and the Indian Oceans are pre-eminently regions which, down to a recent date, have been subject to great crustal movements and to excessive volcanic action, we may infer that in the development of their coast-lines the sea played a very subordinate part. The shores, indeed, are largely protected from marine erosion by partially emerged volcanic ridges and by coral islands and reefs, and to a considerable extent also by the sediment which in tropical regions especially is swept down to the coast in great abundance by rains and rivers. Moreover, as the geological structure of these regions assures us, the land would appear seldom to have remained sufficiently long at one level to permit of much destruction by waves and tidal currents.

In fine, then, we arrive at the general conclusion that the coast-lines of the globe are of very unequal age. Those of the Atlantic were determined as far back as Palæozoic times by great mountain-up lifts along the margin of the continental plateau. Since the close of that period many crustal oscillations have taken place, but no grand mountain-ranges have again been ridged up on the Atlantic sea-board. Meanwhile the Palæozoic mountain-chains, as we have seen, have suffered extensive denudation, have been planed down to sea-level, and even submerged. Subsequently converted into land, wholly or partially as the case may have been, they now present the appearance of plains and plateaux of erosion, often deeply indented by the sea. No true mountains of elevation are met with anywhere in the coast-lands of the Atlantic, while volcanic action has well-nigh ceased. In short, the Atlantic margins have reached a stage of comparative stability. The trough itself, however, is traversed by at least two well-marked banks of upheaval – the great meridional Dolphin Ridge, and the approximately transmeridional Faröe-Icelandic belt – both of them bearing volcanic islands.

But while all the coast-lands of the Atlantic proper attained relative stability at an early period, those of the Mediterranean and Caribbean depressions have up to recent times been the scenes of great crustal disturbance. Gigantic mountain-chains were uplifted along their margins at so late a period as the Tertiary, and their shores still witness volcanic activity.

It is upon the margins and within the trough of the Pacific Ocean, however, that subterranean action is now most remarkably developed. The coast-lines of that great basin are everywhere formed of grand uplifts and volcanic ranges, which, broadly speaking, are comparable in age to those of the Mediterranean and Caribbean depressions. Along the north-eastern margin of the Indian Ocean the coast-lines resemble those of the Pacific, being of like recent age, and similarly marked by the presence of numerous volcanoes. The northern and western shores, however (as in Hindustan, Arabia, and East Africa), have been determined rather by regional elevation or by subsidence of the ocean-floor than by axial uplifts – the chief crustal disturbances dating back to an earlier period than those of the East Indian Archipelago. It is in keeping with this greater age of the western and northern coast-lands of the Indian Ocean that volcanic action is now less strongly manifested in their vicinity.

I have spoken of the comparative stability of the earth’s crust within the Atlantic area as being evidenced by the greater age of its coastal ranges and the declining importance of its volcanic phenomena. This relative stability is further shown by the fact that the Atlantic sea-board is not much disturbed by earthquakes. This, of course, is what might have been expected, for earthquakes are most characteristic of volcanic regions and of those areas in which mountain-uplifts of recent geological age occur. Hence the coast-lands of the Pacific and the East Indies, the borders of the Caribbean Sea, the volcanic ridges of the Atlantic basin, the lands of the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, and the Aralo-Caspian depressions, the shores of the Red Sea, and vast tracts of southern Asia, are the chief earthquake regions of the globe. It may be noted, further, that shocks are not only most frequent but most intense in the neighbourhood of the sea. They appear to originate sometimes in the volcanic ridges and coastal ranges, sometimes under the floor of the sea itself. Now earthquakes, volcanoes, and uplifts are all expressions of the one great fundamental fact that the earth is a cooling and contracting body, and they indicate the lines of weakness along which the enormous pressures and strains induced by the subsidence of the crust upon its nucleus find relief. We cannot tell why the coast-lands of the Atlantic should have attained at so early a period a stage of relative stability – why no axial uplifts should have been developed along their margins since Palæozoic times. It may be that relief has been found in the wrinkling-up of the floor of the oceanic trough, and consequent formation of the Dolphin Ridge and other great submarine foldings of the crust; and it is possible that the growth of similar great ridges and wrinkles upon the bed of the Pacific may in like manner relieve the coast-lands of that vast ocean, and prevent the formation of younger uplifts along their borders.

I have already remarked that two kinds of elevatory movements of the crust are recognised by geologists – namely, axial and regional uplifts. Some, however, are beginning to doubt, with Professor Suess, whether any vast regional uplifts are possible. Yet the view that would attribute all such apparent elevations of the land to subsidence of the crust under the great oceanic troughs is not without its difficulties. Former sea-margins of very recent geological age occur in all latitudes, and if we are to explain these by sub-oceanic depression, this will compel us to admit, as Suess has remarked, a general lowering of the sea-level of upwards of 1000 feet. But it is difficult to believe that the sea-floor could have subsided to such an extent in recent times. Suess thinks it is much more probable that the high-level beaches of tropical regions are not contemporaneous with those of higher latitudes, and that the phenomena are best explained by his hypothesis of a secular movement of the ocean – the water being, as he contends, alternately heaped up at the equator and the poles. The strand-lines in high latitudes, however, are certainly connected with glaciation in some way not yet understood; and if it cannot be confidently affirmed that they indicate regional movements of the land, the evidence, nevertheless, seems to point in that direction.

In concluding this imperfect outline-sketch of a large subject, I ought perhaps to apologise for having trespassed so much upon the domains of geology. But in doing so I have only followed the example of geologists themselves, whose divagations in territories adjoining their own are naturally not infrequent. From much that I have said, it will be gathered that with regard to the causes of many coastal changes we are still groping in the dark. It seems not unlikely, however, that as light increases we may be compelled to modify the view that all oscillations of the sea-level are due to movements of the lithosphere alone. That is a very heretical suggestion; but that a great deal can be said for it any one will admit after a candid perusal of Suess’s monumental work, Das Antlitz der Erde.

THE END

1

Portion of a lecture given in 1886 to the Class of Geology in the University of Edinburgh.

2

Scottish Geographical Magazine, vol. i., 1885.

3

The geological reader hardly requires to be reminded that many of the minor streams would have their courses determined, or greatly modified, by the geological structure of the ground. Thus, such streams often flow along the “strike” and other “lines of weakness,” and similar causes, doubtless, influenced the main rivers during the gradual excavation of their valleys.

4

Scottish Geographical Magazine, vol. ii., 1886.

5

Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc. vol. ii. p. 267.

6

This is the generally accepted view of modern geologists. It is very difficult, however, to understand how a wide continental area can be vertically upheaved. It seems more probable that the upheaval of the land is only apparent. The land seems to rise because the sea retreats as the result of the subsidence of the crust within the great oceanic basins. See Article xiv. (1892.)

7

From Good Words for 1876.

8

In the extreme north of Scotland we find that the Scottish ice was, in like manner, compelled to turn aside and overflow Caithness from south-east to north-west.

9

Great Ice Age.

10

Good Words, 1879.

11

Address to the Geological Society of Edinburgh, 1884.

12

I no longer believe in this “great submergence.” The marine shells in the high-level drift-deposits of our islands are “erratics,” carried by the ice-sheet which occupied the basin of the Irish Sea. That the low-grounds were submerged but the amount of the submergence has not been ascertained; probably it did not exceed a few hundred feet.

13

Klockmann, Jahrb. der k. preuss. geol. Landesanstalt für 1883, p. 330.

14

I have given Mr. Darwin’s views, and discussed the origin of the Pleistocene fluvio-glacial deposits at some length in Prehistoric Europe, chaps, viii. and ix. To this work I refer for detailed geological evidence in support of the view advocated above.

15

The late Mr. Belt, as is well known, was of opinion that all the rivers flowing north in Europe and Asia were dammed back by a great Polar glacier, and that all the low-tracts in the northern portions of the two continents were thus covered by wide inland seas of freshwater. As I do not believe that such a Polar ice-cap existed during the Glacial period, I cannot agree with Mr. Belt that the alluvial plains of northern Siberia mark the sites of ice-dammed lakes.

16

See footnote, p. 173.

17

The Scottish Naturalist, 1881.

18

Great Ice Age, 2nd edit., p. 609.

19

Proceedings Royal Physical Society, Edinburgh, 1881.

20

For a fuller discussion of the distribution of erratics on the Continent, I may refer to Appendix, Note B, in Prehistoric Europe, where the reader will find references to the literature of this interesting subject. [Continental geologists now recognise a distinct stage of the Ice Age, during which their “Upper Diluvium” was deposited by a great glacier that occupied the basin of the Baltic. This “Great Baltic Glacier” appears to have been contemporaneous with the local ice-sheets and valley-glaciers of the Highlands and other mountain-tracts of our island. See Article X. 1892.]

21

This enthusiastic geologist died in 1891.

22

Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxv. p. 425

23

See Mr. Skertchly’s description of East Anglian deposits in Great Ice Age, 2nd edit., p. 358.

24

Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. ii., 1874.

25

Mr. Mackintosh says nothing about the “carry” or direction of the erratics in west and south Wales. Were the paths of these erratics delineated upon a map, we should find it necessary to suppose that the wind- or sea-current by which the floating-ice was propelled had flowed outwards in all directions from the dominant heights!

26

It must have likewise flowed in more or less direct opposition to the current which, in accordance with the iceberg hypothesis, transported boulders southwards from the high-grounds of south Wales!

27

Presidential Address to the Geological Section of the British Association, Newcastle, 1889.

28

“Untersuchungen über die Klimate der Gegenwart und der Vorwelt,” etc. —Natuurkundige Verhandelingen v. d. Holland. Maatsch. d. Wetensch. te Haarlem, 1865.

29

These appear to have been first detected by Professor Berendt and Professor E. Geinitz.

30

Jahrb. d. königl. preuss. geologischen Landesanstalt für 1884, p. 438.

31

“Die Vergletscherung des Salzachgebietes, etc.”: Geographische Abhandlungen herausgegeben v. A. Penck, Band i. Heft 1.

32

Prehistoric Europe, 1881.

33

See a paper by M. E. Delvaux: Ann. de la. Soc. géol. de Belg., t. xiii. p. 158.

34

Zeitschrift d. deutsch. geolog. Ges., Bd. xxxvii., p. 177.

35

For papers by Berendt and his associates see especially the Jahrbuch d. k. preuss. geol. Landesanstalt, and the Zaitschr. d. deutsch. geol. Ges. for the past few years. Geinitz: Forsch. z. d. Lands- u. Volkskunde, i. 5; Leopoldina, xxii., p. 37; I. Beitrag z. Geologie Mecklenburgs, 1880, pp. 46, 56. Sederholm: Fennia, I. No. 7.

36

H. Schröder: Jahrb. d. k. preuss. geol. Landesanstalt für 1887 , p. 360.

37

Penck: Die Vergletscherung der deutschen Alpen. Blaas: Zeitschrift d. Ferdinandeums, 1885. Böhm: Jahrb. d. k. k. geol. Reichsanstalt, 1885, Bd. xxxv., Heft 3. Brückner: Die Vergletscherung d. Salzachgebietes, etc., 1886.

38

Abhandl. z. geol. Specialkarte v. Preussen, etc., Bd. vii. Heft 1; Zeitschr. d. Zeutsch. geol. Ges., 1885, p. 904; 1886, p. 367.

39

Hygienische Topographie von Strassburg i. E., 1885.

40

Abhandl. z. geol. Specialkarte a. Elsass-Lothringen, Bd. iv. Heft 2.

41

Laspeyres: Erläuterungen z. geol Specialkaret v Preussen, etc., Blatt. Gröbzig, Zörbig, und Petersberg.

42

Klockmann: Jahrb. d. k. preuss. geol. Landesanstalt für 1883, p. 262.

43

Wahnschaffe: Op. cit., and Zeitschr. d. deutsch. geol. Ges., 1886, p. 367.

44

Falsan: La Période glaciaire, p. 81.

45