Simple Truths of Life

One picture is some primitive society that does not have technology, where each person tries to get food for himself as best he can. There is no mutual help between people, and the knowledge acquired by one person will disappear after his death instead of being preserved and serving as a lesson to other generations. As a result, many people in this very extreme way of organizing society will suffer, making mistakes because of their ignorance.

Another picture is the same fragmented society as in the previous example, but here people have technology. Because each individual person does what he wants in the absence of a general order and general rules of behavior, conflicts between people are inevitable in such chaos.

As for the other extreme, I hope you yourself perfectly understand why the total slavery of society is a mistake. By the way, if we move by one or two steps on the scale towards the golden mean, then we will receive serfdom and slave-owning societies that we had in our history.

Second green row:

When all products are made exclusively by people, people have to work very hard. There can be diseases, psychological depression, and high mortality. On the bright side, it can be noted that people are in nature, which is the focus of their attention – people cultivate their spirituality, observing how the world around them works.

As for the extreme, when all products are made exclusively by machines, robots, I remembered a saying about free cheese that exists only in a mousetrap. Since machines will do everything for a person, a certain number of people may lose the desire to learn and develop themselves, which will lead to a lot of mistakes and suffering; other people will also feel the consequences of the wrong decisions of people with little education. Then there is a negative thing in the fact that many people might focus their attention on the material world and they will not have time to develop their spirituality; as a result, people will have to stay for a life or two on the planet of the first category.

Third blue row:

When absolutely all manufactured products are accessible to absolutely all people in society, including those who do not want to work, then those people who work may begin to experience negative emotions and thoughts from the fact that not working people can receive exactly as much as they do – this will lead to conflicts. Perhaps many people will have no incentive to work at all, which will negatively affect their psyche and place even more burden on those who work.

It is worth clarifying that by work here I mean such activity, the result of which will give society vital resources and products. That is, acting, streaming on the Internet, manually decorating dishes, etc. is (in a balanced society without money, for example) a hobby, but not a job.

At the opposite extreme, there is a barrier between human and product, which may well be money. Many people strive to accumulate as much money as possible; since there is a limited amount of money, an increase in money for one person means a decrease in money for another person; to some extent, the poor themselves enrich the rich when they buy their products. Another way to get more money from other people is through theft, deception, scam, etc. There may be homeless people in society; someone will engage in prostitution so as not to be on the street, or simply not to be a beggar. Then a price tag can be put even on people who are sold into slavery… and there are many other examples of why capitalism lies precisely in the extreme that brings people suffering.

Here we need to remember that each person does what he believes will make his life better (or keep his life situation at the same level, if the person feels good in it). Material and spiritual knowledge of a person influences his choice in each specific situation. This feature of life manifests itself very negatively in a society with any divisions – financial, political, etc.

For example, people with a lot of money and/or power may begin to see a threat in a poor society which also wants a better life, and, naturally, according to the aforementioned law, after acquiring new knowledge/awareness it will strive to achieve it. For the poor very rich people can also pose a threat, since rich exploit the poor for their high-income existence. There can be serious bloody conflicts if society does not know the basics of how spirituality works – I talked about this topic in my book, Simple Truths of Life, and I strongly advise you to read the free e-book Thiaoouba Prophecy which sheds light on many of the fundamentals of life.

The use of money within the country (for people to get any products and services in their own country) is not reasonable. Due to the duality of life, there are two extreme types of monetary system:

• 

Where there are no restrictions on how much money each person can have. This will lead to a few wealthy people (multimillionaires today), and the vast majority of people will hardly have enough money to get vital products and resources;

• 

At the other extreme is the equalization of the received money for all people, when each person receives the same amount, regardless of his work. This is not reasonable, since with this approach it is rational to remove money altogether from internal use in your country. People will be able to receive the same amount of products, but there will be no cashiers, financiers, bankers, and other people involved in finance; there will be almost no thieves too, which will reduce the number of police officers. All those people “freed” from the monetary burden will be able to work in other truly useful jobs for society, which will reduce the average working day in the country for all people.

Money also sometimes makes people stay in themselves, and not in reality, since there is no confidence in the future, in the depths of consciousness there is a reflection of fear of being left without money and becoming homeless.

Obtaining resources, knowledge, and technology also takes a lot of time and requires training. There is no need to have another artificially created resource (money) and litter your head with unnecessary information about all the complex intricacies of the work of that resource. And many people do not understand its work at all – so, I was surprised to find out that people do not know the exact causes of inflation! There are only theories! Theories about the principles of work of what we ourselves have created… But money does not even stand close to the technologies thanks to which we make processors and similar equipment, for example – there we really may not know all the laws of physics, but at the same time we know enough to create useful things for ourselves…

Socialism is also an unbalanced way of organizing society. Since under socialism there is a barrier in the form of money between a person and a product, all people suffer in one way or another. Because all people want to live without suffering, everyone will strive for a better life. Depending on material and spiritual knowledge, some people will try to pull society towards complete capitalism, while others, wiser, towards complete lack of money within the country. Since people who know the truths that I am trying to convey to the peoples of the Earth in this book would not make a choice in favor of socialism in the first place, the chances are that people who chose to live under socialism will make a choice in favor of capitalism due to the lack of critical knowledge – this is what we see in the recent history of many countries on our planet.

I will briefly talk about the now popular ideas of organizing a society where people are, or are very close, to all three extremes: each person decides by himself how to create products for himself; all products are manufactured only by robotics; there is no barrier between a person and a product.

Here are my thoughts on this way of organizing society:

In such a society, people do not work and do not feel like a single one, whole society. There is a division of people into those who are engaged in art, hobbies, and other self-developing things, and they are doing it only for themselves (and someone may be doing nothing at all), but for other people they do nothing; there is an alienation of people from each other. To some extent, this reflects the division of people under capitalism, where everyone works for their own survival. And any strong division of people in society foretells problems.

Here we can say that balance is when people do something (work) for other people, and at the same time they have enough time to do something for themselves (hobbies, education, outdoor activities, personal life, travel, etc.). I am reminded of the analogy Thao said about atoms that connect very closely together to create a brick or any other building material; if the atoms repelled each other, then disintegration would occur.

It can also be noted that living at an extreme point does not always mean that absolutely all people will make mistakes and suffer. This means that the consequences of living in such an extreme system will encourage some people with little spiritual knowledge to make mistakes that will cause others to suffer.

Next, I will briefly outline the basics of my vision of a balanced organization of society and talk about how, in my opinion, we can come to such a just life without any serious conflicts between different people.

The purpose of our existence is spiritual development through our physical bodies, which must be maintained in healthy condition in order for them to live and function correctly. Otherwise, we will suffer. The more a person becomes spiritual, the less he makes mistakes and, accordingly, causes less suffering to the particles of the Superior Intelligence (himself and other living beings). For this reason, the more spiritual society, the greater the chance of lack of money within the country – people will start thinking about the well-being of others, and not just about themselves. I think that people will come to a spiritually oriented order in society when they get tired of suffering for their own mistakes, their stubbornness will go away, and they will begin to learn from their mistakes, which they will be able to openly look at, and not try to erase their existence from their heads.

What maintains our bodies in life: healthy food, clean water and air, salvation from adverse weather conditions (housing). Since a person exists in order to develop spiritually, he needs to be able to be sometimes alone with himself and in silence (quiet apartments, summer cottages of a certain minimum area, parks, etc.), where a person can meditate, study calmly and go about his business.

To maintain our life, 3 ingredients are required: knowledge, resources, and tools (technologies) with the help of which people can create other tools for their needs (houses, tractors, cars, medical supplies, food, purified water, sewage, electricity, the Internet, etc.).

One of the main Laws of the Universe says that making a mistake leads to suffering. One of the most serious mistakes is limiting the free will of another person, or more precisely: imposing one’s will on another, in a way which deprives the individual of the privilege of exercising his own free will. Therefore, only self-discipline is needed. No one has the right to restrict the freedom of choice of another person if his actions do not harm other people – there is an exception if those other people consciously agree with such harmful activities in relation to them, which, of course, is still an error from the point of view of the Universal Law.

But one should also not forget about common sense and logic. If a person faces an imminent and rapidly approaching danger, and you can save him, then, of course, you will not make a mistake when you help him without his consent, while slightly influencing his physical body.

People, being part of the Superior Intelligence, depending on their material and spiritual knowledge, perform those actions that they consider will benefit them in the life situation in which they are. Knowledge is very important. The functioning of society is primarily based on accumulated knowledge. Therefore, people must have control over the affairs of their society, so that no one tries to introduce false knowledge that will lead to suffering. We call it democracy when people are in power.

I believe that people as a whole [society] have power almost always, since the movement of the whole society occurs in accordance with what each individual person does.

Here's an example. There is a ball that needs to be moved. When people have different levels of knowledge and understandings, they push the ball in the direction that they believe, based on their knowledge, will benefit them. If people push it from different sides with approximately the same force, then that ball will stay in place. If people understand that only by acting together they can move the ball, they will move it in one direction and make progress. It is people's different choices and actions that determine what the total direction the country will go to, not the written law which people can choose to follow or not to follow.

In the digital world, many people can vote from home. But it is necessary that vote only those people who have an education in the field on which they vote (new medical equipment – medical education, a new clean motor – engineering and/or environmental, etc.), otherwise uneducated people with a bunch of conspiracy theories in their head can cause suffering for the majority. General education will also allow voting on issues that do not require deep knowledge in certain areas.

Thus, people will not suffer because of the voting of uneducated people, and at the same time, the free will law will be respected, since if a person wants to take part in public affairs, he just needs to start educating himself and then pass exams to confirm his knowledge.

General education includes at least the following disciplines: the language of your country, the general laws of your country, spirituality, history, physics, biology, chemistry, psychology, mathematics, algebra, geometry, sociology, social studies, natural history, natural science, geography, ecology, astronomy. People should know about the duality of life, and should know the difference between capitalism and communism, private and personal property, freedom and slavery. Of course, they should know the descriptions of words, and understand that in the description of communism, for example, there is nothing that is associated with murders, as some politicians are trying to impose on other people with little knowledge.

Regarding the general laws of the country, with a correct and balanced way of organizing society, there will not be so many of them, and therefore it will not be difficult for people to remember them – there will no longer be a need for lawyers.

Spirituality includes teachings about such things as the Laws of the Universe, the Aura, the Astral body (soul), reincarnation, the Higher Self, the etheric force field – essentially everything that Thiaooubians taught us in Michel Desmarquet's book Thiaoouba Prophecy. Of course, I perfectly understand that this subject will be introduced only after people prove the existence of Auras, telekinesis, etc. Ideally, this should not take long, given that scientists can already photograph Auras and diagnose human health from them. There are other hints in Michel's book, as well as in Michel's audio interview with Michael Meanwell, on how to prove the truth of his report.

I think that it is worth including in the educational program the training to see Auras, as well as teaching telekinesis – so that people know about their existence, and not believe.

I include psychology, since the teachings about the work of our psyche are very important for a healthy life. As Thaora told Michel Desmarquet, it is in the area of the psyche that our current greatest problems exist.

Physical education lessons will certainly remain in school too.

Then I suppose that children should be taught about sex and Palantius (and about what love and spiritual affinity are) before people develop sex drive. Otherwise, there is a chance that adolescents will unknowingly make mistakes, sleeping with everyone (I know this from what I saw at school. And if it were not for my speech stupor and some other psychological problems that I had in my thirteen years, then there is some chance that I myself could have happily rushed to make such mistakes). Then, how can we get rid of sexually transmitted viral infections in such a society? The condom, as I hope you understand, is another barrier that prevents people from experiencing natural sensations during natural sex.

There are two types of teaching subjects: natural (created by the Superior Intelligence) and artificial (created by people; although from a certain point of view, they were also created by the Superior Intelligence). Natural have been listed above, and they are permanent – provided our knowledge is accurate. Artificial objects are not permanent and can change. These include subjects such as languages, computer science and programming languages, country laws, traffic rules, and everything else that was created by humans.

Regarding knowledge, we can say that they are finite, and we can show as a percentage, or just a number from the total of all knowledge, the progress of how much a person already knows from all knowledge of a particular subject, or from all knowledge in general (natural and/or artificial). This will show the person what else he can learn at school, institute, etc. The same progress can also show what a person still needs to learn in order to work in a particular institution.

Duality applies to laws as well. There are the Laws of the Universe which are immutable (provided that we did not make a mistake in our conclusions about how a particular thing works in the Universe), but there are also laws that were artificially created by people. Artificial laws should not violate the Laws of the Universe, otherwise suffering will follow the mistake. The word “rule” is more appropriate than “law”, since people decide for themselves how to live.

I would single out 3 groups that dictate the behavior of society:

The Laws of the Universe. We know about them from science and from the proof of the existence of certain things. Following the Laws of the Universe, we will make few mistakes and, as a result, we will suffer little;

Rules invented by people. Traffic rules, grammatical rules in the language, rules of self-organization of society, etc. – what should exist so that there is no chaos;

And recommendations. For example, wearing a mask and gloves during a coronavirus would be recommendations – naturally, people would be taught that the virus is not only real, but also dangerous; do not expose yourself and others to possible suffering. It is worth understanding and remembering that each person suffers only for his own mistakes. Even before the restrictions on freedom of movement, I thought about taking less walks during the virus, as I understood that if I got sick, I could die and I would not finish my book, which I consider quite important for people (you decide if this is so or not), and therefore I did not need restrictions and directions on how to live my life.

But the aforementioned voting still takes a lot of time, as it distracts people from their responsibilities (work) to society. Moreover, there are times, such as war, when a democratic voting will cause the death of the entire nation. Therefore, it is logical that you need to have one leader. It is also logical that this leader should make those decisions that will benefit the people. This leader must be honest, wise, and intelligent, and he must not be a member of any political party. Here knowledge about spirituality will help us. People who have accumulated spiritual knowledge in their Astral body during their previous lives will not do bad things towards anyone in their life, starting from childhood. Such people will be able to be sincerely committed to striving to do their best for their nation.

How do we find such people? Thao advised Michel that people follow the example of the continent of Mu, whose people were the most organized on Earth in its entire history.

People in each village (as well as dachas and other rural settlements) and urban areas will elect a person who will meet all of the above parameters. No one with a record of bad conduct or a tendency towards fanaticism during their current life could be chosen. Such people are chosen for their honesty and purity, not for the promises they made but could not keep.

Thus, I might not have been selected because of my two childhood episodes, when I laughed at a girl with my friend, and when I decided to roll around in the snow the guy who was younger than me. My other life decisions should also serve as a block, but you would not have known about them if I had not personally and honestly told about them. I mention this so that you understand that the choice of the leader of the village and the district should be approached very, very seriously, and there is no need to be afraid of anyone or anything if you know that someone has done something wrong during their life – otherwise there is a chance that because of your silence the whole country will suffer, and you too will have to suffer for your mistake.

Also, a person cannot appoint himself as a candidate. If someone says that he wants to be the candidate from the village/district, then this is a clear sign that the person is hungry for attention and power. Such a person cannot be chosen as a representative.

If it so happens that there is no person who meets all the necessary parameters in a village or district, then they do not choose anyone.

Further, these selected people will be sent to the nearest city, where further elections will be held.

These midterm elections are held in the same way as the final ones, which I will discuss in the next paragraph:

All elected representatives from all over the country will meet in the capital. There they will be divided into groups of six people each. Each group will have their own conference room, and they will spend 10 days together – talking, eating together, and the like. Eventually they will choose the leader of the group.

If 60 representatives came to the capital, and they were divided into ten groups, then there would be 10 group leaders. Of these ten, 7 would be chosen in the same way, and then they would choose the Supreme Leader.

We can initially determine the number of representatives who will come to the capital for the final elections by dividing the country into virtual zones. For example, in order for 60 selected representatives to come to the capital, we need to virtually divide the country into 60 zones; then we divide each of those zones into further zones, and this process goes on until we have several dozen villages and city districts in one mini-zone.

What about cities where population density is currently very high? In my apartment building, for example, there are about 500 apartments, and about 1000 people living in the house – which is the approximate number for the villages’ population. In other houses there are fewer people. It might be possible to combine several houses into one zone for the election of a representative if the total number of residents does not exceed 1000 people. Otherwise, a representative is chosen in a single apartment building.

Thus, the chances are that the 7 leaders will most likely not know each other and will not be in cahoots.

It is worth noting that in Mu, a leader was only elected in this way if the previous Supreme Leader died without appointing a successor, or the successor was not unanimously approved by the Council of Seven. I would leave it to the people to decide by voting if they want the Supreme Leader to be able to appoint a successor or not.

If the Supreme Leader shows the slightest tendency to dictatorship, then the peer council of six must overthrow him. If for some reason this does not happen, then people initiate a voting to overthrow the entire council of seven and then initiate new elections using the Mu method.

The Supreme Leader's vote is worth two votes. If four are against him, and two are with him on a specific issue, then they will be at a deadlock. They will spend hours or days debating until one in seven changes their mind. This discussion is held in the context of intelligence, love and concern for the people.