The theory of everything, which is not

My life cannot be called prosperous. Furthermore, I believe that I have lived to no avail and use. Of course, this is my life, and I’m not going to abandon it. (Very common technique when someone is offered a hypothetical to live another “intelligent” life, and then begins: – “now, if I’d known, I would have been so…” – it is assumed that if a man lived with glasses flashing all, on the way encountered the rake, he had lived, would life happy… Silly, aren’t they?

Or: – “Who would you like to be?” … A giraffe… This just can’t be. It was not life, but something else. There is such a beautiful and tragic film “Groundhog Day”, where people live one day an infinite number of times… bill Murray and Andie MacDowell were not topics to do clowning, make it scary…

Still, I often try to understand what was stupid, what still was right, despite the heart-rending cries of ex-wives (or rather, of conscience). The worst thing in life – the inability to rectify the stupidity. Strugatsky, one of the main laws of “proper” society: – “not to take irreversible actions”, i.e. actions whose consequences cannot be neutralized… We have successfully spit on this rule all the time and every day… If only to know…

Since then, I learned to read (I think it happened at the age of six), I am forced to live simultaneously in several worlds. These feeling should be familiar to everyone – literature, independent world, does not coincide with the reality, neither in space nor in time. Say is a feature of any of this art: cinema, theater, painting… I’m sorry, but this is not true. The action of the play, movie – it’s the same painting – it lives before us, intruding into reality, but the isolated frame, screen, rail – it is SEPARATED visibly. We can step back, look away, forget about it for a while… But the book – a real book – she PULLS us out of reality, brings our mind into my world… Remember how irritated we come back to reality, if someone rudely separates us from the book, perceived as an UNCOMFORTABLE reality…

This world has nothing to do with real life. We create it in our imagination at a very meager dashes from the Arsenal of God the Creator for his imagination and talent. Cities, oceans, mountains, and beautiful castles. And the characters? Writers give their portraits in the most General terms, in their own way, and often they don’t describe (maybe not know how? sketch is to Lombroso) – and should be, is it us? For myself I can say – starting to read an interesting book, I already have in mind a kind of matrix world of this book, a rough model, which is detailed, crystallizes as you read. Even such abstract books, like the Bible – has been created in my imagination.

The characters are quite recognizable features of both the exterior and character. And it often happens that even watching a talented short, we curse the Director, destroying the us invented our own world – for us IT is REAL. People, cities, countries, other planets or medieval castles. And let the people in the books do not understand the literary language, never speak in life, one’s actions bear little resemblance to those of the stupidity that we create every minute… But for us real – planet Saraksh, studded with towers of PBZ or Syria with some Masonic-tamplierov ISIS? Troy, inhabited by Achilles and Poseidon, Dostoyevsky’s St. Petersburg, or “virgin soil upturned”? How is it compared to Solaris by Stanislaw LEM or the mad world, where the coiled strings, hiding in the folds of eleven of our space scientists-physicists?

Honestly, I have better somewhere on Eden the same LEM. There are all recognizable and so comfortable…

(IT SEEMS THAT SOMEWHERE THERE IS HIDDEN THE DOG, BUT I, UH, CONFUSED HERE …)

Someone starts to read this, and drop: – some wit, even without higher education, and there is!!! What does that say!?

But someone should and maybe it can. And academic education… Where are the academics? The money you earn? Moreover, I believe that this issue can be solved – if at all – and not me! – mind, not burdened with rules and myslenie stamps. And why would not I?

The subject is so complex, vast and unknowable that it is possible to use only the most common definitions of the type “GOD”, “Space”, “Structure”, and not even try to somehow classify, systematize or analyze, so these phenomena are unique, complex and inaccessible to our mind. They have no analogies in the life experience of mankind. No technology in the philosophical and scientific schools, not even tools for the study and the definitions of these concepts and phenomena. No statistics… And statistics in the theory of “Big Bang”? Only intuition and logic. Moreover, the entire human experience here can only be used as a material to work with, but not the basis and postulates. All the laws of nature, bred for the history of human civilization, there are only special cases and cannot be the determining factor.

***-4-

And we must remember that we are only the smallest elements, the particles of the Grand mechanism of Execution of the will of God. Thus the Will of GOD – GOD’s plan, and we – the people – that is, “mind-body” – only element of this program.

The element is easily replaceable.

In the culture of humanity there are many arguments in favor of the proposition that the human mind is a phenomenon to the world an unnatural, irrational, placed in an artificial environment OUTSIDE with a definite purpose. (From the “OUTSIDE” is not from another galaxy, planet, but from another, the “upper” world.)

And being of the Mind, intuitively feeling their nepriyatnosti the world, confirms this – the Mind seeks to free itself from the imposed structure (and why in the Word of GOD constantly exaggerated rejection of Samudra, the sinfulness of any irrational action, COMPLETE trust (FAITH) GOD. I.e., the rejection of personal bias and rejection of the status quo.

However, the media mind lives obeying the feeling, emotions that do not depend on logic and even self preservation. There is a systematic destruction of the biosphere of the Earth, although people understand samobytnoe such practices, people are constantly destroying their own kind, and this from the very beginning was a little if not a necessary condition of human community, and this despite the fact that life (own) is the person in the first place in a series of values of life.

Here you can see the opposition between the pure Mind – the phenomenon of Space (the Universe) and Person – synthesis of the mind (soul) and body, spiritual and material. Personality cannot exist beyond this material world, the Mind is weary of its limitations, locality, temporality. The mind seeks the ABSOLUTENESS of the UNIVERSE, ignoring the world and life…

***-5-

The closest to understanding the will of GOD came Strugatsky “for a Billion years before the end of the world”. (As far as I know). But then functions of this system they didn’t (did not dare… or they don’t have such problem). In General, the attitude to GOD they have a dual – realizing that without IT, the picture of the world absolutely not functional, knowing (or suspecting) about HIS dominance, they are afraid of stating this fact, because it denies all their literary construction (the very meaning of their life). They don’t want to admit that it has serious value (and any suemudrie, including mine.). However, of course, I can’t for them to say something specific. Just my impression.

***-6-

…So, no GOOD and EVIL really is just that the imperatives of this condition of human civilization, existing ethical system. Categories established by the people only for the convenience of communication. This topic has already been said so much that no man here can say something new. Good or evil – to deprive of life of the terminally ill, the host of the agony, and every second cursing others, supporting life in it – contrary to his pleas?! (for me personally the greatest evil in the human heart is when a person puts himself above others, and thus perceive others as subhuman. If he has the means to achieve their goals – examples of this are known to all… Good or evil to take the life of this monster?)

Yes, GOD gives us in the Book, HIS idealistic benchmarks, but in the Bible there are only functions, endowed with the properties of IT, IT Will, but not real people. And because HE gave us Freedom of choice (that is not restricted to attitudes). The main thing – to live according to HIS Will, guided by the commandments; that is what is said to THEM (AND. X.) in the sermon on the mount, and not giving the rest of us countless interpreters of HIS Words. HE said;

– " Will everyone teach his brother; – Behold the Lord their GOD, Because I’ll be in my heart and the heart of every …”

Scientist-ophthalmologist Muldashev E. R., a specialist in the mysterious land of Shambala, justified in their doctrine the thesis of the savagery of mankind. What he means by this term is unknown, it could be a dumbing down of the mind? Or regression of the process of thinking…

But scientists delights, he proves the following ethnographic “experiments” :

– … Two years ago I came to Indonesia at the invitation of chief ophthalmologist of the country (also a specialist gnoseology, obviously …). I liked the Indonesian doctors: smiling, enthusiastic and keen interest in everything new, they gave the impression of a highly civilized and highly educated people. However, I was tempted to ask them about cannibalism, which we know from school, it was common in this country.

– Tell me, do you people eat? – do not resist, I asked the chief ophthalmologist in a private conversation.

Savages do not take knowledge, – said the chief ophthalmologist… they are like animals live by instinct. Perhaps many years ago these tribes were more civilized, but completely and irrevocably alienated.

– I understand from your words that if people moved to a primitive way of life and alienated, then return them to civilized forms of life is impossible. —

– I think so, ' said chief ophthalmologist.

– I’ve been in these tribes, tried to heal their eyes… They don’t understand, their brains are poorly developed. —

I paused. It is the process of brutalization, it was impossible to stop! Savagery is coming for all! …

– “… Only the Lemurians escaped the mass savagery… Atlanta has undergone a process of mass savagery twice.” —

( Lobsang Rampa, “Doctor from Lhasa”, 1994, p. 236 )

– “… But not all feral people on earth had died, they, as we know, is still preserved in many regions of the earth…” —

– … Amazonian Indians living by collecting latex from rubber trees and fishing. They put nets woven from cords, fish-pirarucu weighing up to 300 pounds. If you catch a fish – eat her whole village, if not – all hungry.

“Tell me,” I asked one of the Indians, more or less spoke English, crocodile and Anaconda attack people? —

“Of course,” replied the Indian. – Crocodiles eat women, and anacondas – men. —

– Why is it so selectively? —

– And look, look at my second wife, – nodded the Indian in the river.

– She washes dishes on the banks. So did my first wife was washing dishes on the banks, when it quietly sailed crocodile dragged her into the water and devoured … —

– And you’re afraid for your second wife? —

– Fear, of course. But, probably, it is also eaten by a crocodile. Because a woman needs to wash dishes on the beach. If eaten by a crocodile, I’ll take number three, ' said the Indian…

So, will survive if the savages and semi-wild state? Probably still no. —

In fact, perhaps I should think about In light of the research mentioned academician, “doomsday” is quite possible, and not because of some natural disasters. Nature does not like exceptions. And if the starting point is to take Dr. muldasheva, as the zero point of the vector of the savagery of mankind, the phenomenon spread to the entire population of the Earth over the lifetime of one or two generations.

And most importantly, we do not note… As a respected Muldashev E. R.…

I respect Bertrand Russell-philosopher; he does not hide his thoughts of ingenious constructions pseudophilosophical terminology.

With him I want to argue, because in a dispute born … well … especially such a sore subject – " is There life after death.”

Unequivocally – NO. I did not say, and some ancient Greek (can’t remember) – the question if he is afraid of death, the response was :

– How can you be afraid of what is not? After all, when we are alive, death is absent, and when it comes – we are no longer … —

Only I do not understand the evasive position B. Russell ;

– “Before discussing the question of whether we continue to exist after death, it should be clarified in what sense man is the same person I was yesterday…” —

That is, on behalf of the philosophers, Russell believes, “… that there are certain substances – soul and body, and each of them has continuously existed from day to day…” – and – “that the soul, being created, continues to exist forever, while the body temporarily ceases to exist by reason of death, until, unless there is a resurrection…” —

Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.