Полная версия
The Sickening Mind: Brain, Behaviour, Immunity and Disease
PAUL MARTIN
The Sickening Mind
Brain, Behaviour, Immunity and Disease
COPYRIGHT
William Collins
An imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers 1 London Bridge Street London SE1 9GF
www.harpercollins.co.uk
This edition published by HarperPress 2005
First published in the UK by HarperCollinsPublishers, 1997
Copyright © Paul Martin, 1997
Paul Martin has asserted the moral right to be identified as the author of this work
The author and publishers are grateful to the following for permission to reproduce material: International Music Publications Limited, for ‘Sex and Drugs and Rock and Roll’ by Ian Drury and Chas Jankel, © 1977 Temple Mill Music Ltd, Warner/Chappell Music Ltd; Hall, J.G., ‘Emotion and immunity’ Lancet, 2, 326–327, © The Lancet Ltd., (1985); extracts from Riceyman Steps by Arnold Bennett by permission A. P. Watt Ltd., on behalf of Mme V. Eldin; extracts from The Man with the Golden Gun by Ian Fleming by permission Glidrose Publications Ltd, © Glidrose Productions Ltd 1965; extract from Three Men in a Boat by Jerome K. Jerome by permission A. P. Watt Ltd., on behalf of The Society of Authors Ltd.; extracts from Down and Out in Paris and London by George Orwell by permission A. M. Heath & Co. Ltd, copyright © The Estate of the late Sonia Brownell Orwell and Martin Secker and Warburg Ltd; extract from Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller by permission Reed Publishers, © Arthur Miller 1949; extract from ‘Do not go gentle into that good night’ from The Poems by Dylan Thomas by permission David Higham Associates: originally published by J. M. Dent; Thanks also to Harriet Wasserman Literary Agency Inc., for permission to quote from Seize the Day by Saul Bellow; Macmillan General Books, for Jude the Obscure and The Mayor of Casterbridge by Thomas Hardy. Every reasonable effort has been made to contact copyright holders for all the extracts reproduced in this volume. However, it has not been possible to make contact with all copyright holders. The author and publishers would ask, therefore, that any copyright holder who feels a quotation contained herein may contravene their copyright contact HarperCollinsPublishers at the address above.
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the nonexclusive, nontransferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on-screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, downloaded, decompiled, reverse engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage and retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereinafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins e-books.
HarperCollinsPublishers has made every reasonable effort to ensure that any picture content and written content in this ebook has been included or removed in accordance with the contractual and technological constraints in operation at the time of publication.
Source ISBN: 9780006550228
Ebook Edition © MARCH 2016 ISBN: 9780007383658
Version: 2016-02-25
CONTENTS
COVER
TITLE PAGE
COPYRIGHT
1 The Body of Knowledge
Opening shots
Iraqi SCUDs and Chinese grandmothers
Roundheads and Cavaliers
Some completely fictitious case histories
Invisible worms
Chronic fatigue syndrome
2 Shadows on the Sun
Death, disaster and voodoo
Trouble, strife and sickness
Life events
The mind and the common cold
3 Psyche’s Machine: The Inside Story
The perception of sickness
Bad behaviour
Mind over immune matter
Understanding immunity
Autoimmunity
Measuring immunity
The mind – immunity connections
4 Mind and Immunity
What can the mind do to the immune system?
Bereavement and nuclear disasters
Spaceflight, exams and other nastiness
Does it matter?
What can the immune system do to the mind?
Depression
Immune conditioning
Immune conditioning and disease
Some allergic history revisited
The strange story of the left-handed brain
The wonderful world of herpes
5 The Demon Stress
What is stress?
The biology of stress
Stress, immunity and health
The quality of stress
Control, control and control
The joy of stress
The stress-seekers
6 Other People
Hell is other people? – relationships as stressors
Hell is alone? – the harmful effects of isolation
Michael Henchard’s will
How does it work?
Social relationships and immunity
The lonely future
7 The Wages of Work
The toad work
Who suffers and why?
The scourge of unemployment
8 Sick at Heart
Hearts and minds
The mind in sudden cardiac death and heart disease
Coronary-prone personalities and heart disease
The Type A behaviour pattern
Type A – the evidence
Anger and hostility
How does it work?
Biological reactivity and the Type A person
9 The Mind of the Crab
The mind in cancer
Is there a cancer-prone personality?
Some fictional Type Cs
Psychological influences on survival
How does it work?
10 Encumbered with Remedies
Relax!
Exercise!
Those little pink pills
Psychoneuroimmunology and AIDS
Imagery, miracle cures and other exotica
Kill or cure?
11 Exorcising the Ghost in the Machine
That old mind – body problem
The grip of dualism
Some ancient history
René Descartes and the separation of mind from body
Descartes’ demise
12 A Fresh Pair of Lenses
Development
Mothers and offspring
Evolution
Sick by design
Genes for disease
Diseases of modern life
Evolutionary arms races
The functions of unpleasantness
Why does stress make us ill?
Darwin’s illness
Parting shots
KEEP READING
REFERENCES
INDEX
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
NOTES
PRAISE
ABOUT THE PUBLISHER
1 The Body of Knowledge
Most of the time we think we’re sick, it’s all in the mind.
Thomas Wolfe, Look Homeward, Angel (1929)
It is time to acknowledge that our belief in disease as a direct reflection of mental state is largely folklore.
Editorial, New England Journal of Medicine (1985)
Opening shots
You, dear reader, are going to die. Not for a long time, I hope, and painlessly. But die you undoubtedly will. And unless you die in the near future, and from unnatural causes, you will be ill before you die – probably several times. Some remarkable scientific discoveries have shown that your mind will affect your susceptibility to those illnesses and may have a substantial bearing on the nature and timing of your eventual death.
This book is about these scientific discoveries. It explores the ways in which your psychological and emotional state influence your physical health and how, in turn, your physical state affects your mind. It seeks to explain some of the extraordinary things that scientists have discovered in recent years about the interconnections between the brain, behaviour, immunity and health. By unravelling the biological mechanisms that underlie these phenomena, scientists can at last reconcile many commonplace notions about mental influences on health with a modern understanding of how the brain and behaviour affect the functioning of the body.
This is not intended to be a self-help book and I shall not be setting out detailed prescriptions for instant health or miracle cures for AIDS. The rapidly growing corpus of scientific knowledge about mind – body interactions has numerous potentially valuable applications in medicine, and I shall describe them. But practical action must be built on solid foundations of knowledge and understanding. As Sir Francis Bacon once remarked, ‘Knowledge itself is power.’
Bacon also remarked that ‘all knowledge and wonder (which is the seed of knowledge) is an impression of pleasure in itself.’ I hope you will find the discoveries described here intriguing and worthwhile in their own right, regardless of their utilitarian value. We neglect the sheer wonder of scientific knowledge at our peril. Practical applications matter a great deal, but they are not the only fruits of science.
Let us get down to business by conducting a simple thought experiment. When you have read this paragraph shut your eyes and cast your mind back to the most mortifyingly embarrassing moment in your life, the worst that you can dredge up from the dank recesses of your memory. Think hard and choose the most awful, squirm-inducing calamity. Be brutally honest. Perhaps you committed an appalling social blunder at an august gathering, or said exactly the wrong thing at the wrong time. Close your eyes and re-live the incident in all its ghastliness, focusing on your own humiliation.
Have you blushed? Are your cheeks burning with embarrassment? If so, you have just demonstrated a mundane example of an important biological principle: that mere thoughts and emotions can generate very real physical reactions.
If you would like to demonstrate the empirical truth of this principle again, but in a different and more recreational way, close your eyes and conjure up your most arousing and succulent sexual fantasy. You surely must have one. Sit back and let your mind savour the luscious details of whatever erotic images it has chosen. Let the moist, quivering images run rampant. The physical consequences of what is now going on in your mind should, with any luck, be more fun than a blush.
The mind’s influence on the body is usually more serious than a blush or a sexual frisson, however. It can even determine when we die. As an appetizer we shall consider two examples.
Iraqi SCUDs and Chinese grandmothers
During the Gulf War of 1991 Iraq launched a series of missile attacks against Israel. Many Israeli civilians died as a result of these attacks. But the vast majority of them did not die from any direct physical effects of the missiles. They died from heart failure brought on by the fear, anxiety and stress associated with the bombardment. They died because of what was going on in their minds.
How do we know this? After the war was over Israeli scientists analysed the official mortality statistics and found something remarkable. There had been a large and anomalous jump in the death rate among Israeli citizens on one particular day: the day of the first Iraqi attacks.
In the early hours of 18 January 1991 Iraq launched the first of several SCUD missile attacks against Israeli cities. Measured in terms of physical destruction, the Iraqi weapons were surprisingly ineffective. There were no deaths through physical injuries in the first attack and only two people were killed by the direct physical effects of SCUD detonations during the subsequent sixteen days on which missiles fell. And yet, on the day of the first attack, the death rate in Israel leapt by 58 per cent. A total of 147 deaths were reported, 54 more than would have been expected on the basis of previous mortality figures for that time of year. In statistical terms this was a highly significant increase; the odds against it arising from random fluctuations alone were enormous. What happened?
The evidence consistently pointed towards one conclusion: the sharp rise in death rate on 18 January 1991 was primarily a consequence of severe emotional stress brought on by fear of the Iraqi bombardment. It was the psychological impact of the SCUD missiles, not their physical impact, that claimed the majority of the victims.
The reasoning behind this conclusion was straightforward. The unexpected ‘extra’ deaths resulted in the main from heart failure or other forms of abrupt cardiovascular catastrophe. There was no increase in deaths from lingering diseases such as cancer, for example. As we shall see later, psychological stress can induce physiological changes which may prove fatal to someone who already has a diseased heart or clogged coronary arteries.
The ‘extra’ deaths were concentrated in areas of Israel where the levels of fear and anxiety were highest: regions that were known to be threatened by Iraqi missiles. In parts of Israel where SCUDs were not expected to land the mortality rate remained much the same as usual. Psychological studies carried out during this period indicated that the most stressful time for Israeli citizens was the few days leading up to the outbreak of war on 17 January, peaking on the day of the first SCUD missile attacks. There was enormous and well-founded concern about possible Iraqi use of chemical and biological weapons. The entire Israeli population had been issued with gas masks and automatic atropine syringes in case of chemical attack, and every household had been told to prepare a sealed room.1
After the first Iraqi strike had occurred, and turned out to be less cataclysmic than feared, there was a marked decline in levels of stress. As in other wars, the populace adapted to the situation with surprising speed. Then, as the fear and anxiety subsided, so the death rate also began to decline. There were seventeen further Iraqi missile attacks over the following weeks, but Israeli mortality figures over this period were no higher than average.
There is little doubt that many of the Israelis who died in the opening days of the war were killed by the Iraqi missiles. But there is equally little doubt that many of them died because of what was going on in their minds and not from physical injuries. Of course, their mental state was not the only thing that contributed to their deaths. Most, if not all, of those who died also had a pre-existing medical problem which made them especially vulnerable to the damaging effects of psychological stress. Many died because they had pre-existing coronary heart disease and their hearts gave out under the stress.
One of the recurring themes in this book is the simple point that disease and death seldom have single causes. The mind can help to precipitate illness or death, but this does not mean that bacteria, viruses, cancer cells, clogged arteries and other all-too-solid agents of disease are not also involved.
Mortality statistics have revealed another fascinating phenomenon. Psychological factors can not only hasten death, as happened during the Gulf War, they can also postpone it. There is less likelihood of a person dying on the eve of an occasion that has symbolic significance for them, such as an important religious festival or birthday. There is compelling evidence that individuals on the verge of death can postpone their death for a few days until the special occasion has passed.
A clear demonstration of this phenomenon came from some scrupulously designed research conducted by David Phillips and Daniel Smith of the University of California at San Diego. They analysed the mortality statistics for Chinese people living in California to see whether there were any fluctuations in the risk of dying at around the time of the Harvest Moon Festival – an occasion which is of symbolic importance to Chinese people but not others.
Phillips and Smith found a large and statistically significant dip in the number of Chinese dying from natural causes just before the Harvest Moon Festival. This was followed by a corresponding and compensatory rise in mortality just after the festival was over. In the week preceding the festival the death rate among Chinese Californians was 35 per cent below the expected level, while in the week after the festival it was 35 per cent higher than expected. There was no overall change in the number of people dying, but some deaths that would otherwise have occurred just before the festival were somehow postponed until after it was over.
There is little doubt that this strange phenomenon of delayed death was specifically linked to the symbolic occasion of the Harvest Moon Festival. The dip and rise in the risk of dying was most evident among elderly Chinese women, who play a central role in the ceremonies. The Harvest Moon Festival is a movable feast – the date varies somewhat from year to year – so the fluctuation in mortality rate was definitely linked to the occasion itself, rather than to any specific calendar date. Furthermore, there were no comparable fluctuations in mortality among Jews and other non-Chinese Californians for whom the Harvest Moon Festival has no symbolic importance.
The analysis only looked at deaths from natural causes, so the phenomenon could not be explained by changes in people’s propensity to commit suicide. Conceivably, some deaths might have been delayed because sick individuals took better care of themselves in the run-up to the festival, or because they received extra attention from their family and doctor. But the sheer scale of the phenomenon implied that something more profound was going on as well. In fact, the biggest fluctuations were in deaths caused by disorders of the heart and circulatory system, especially strokes and heart attacks. These are notoriously susceptible to psychological and emotional influences.
An almost identical dip and rise in mortality rate occurs among Jewish people around the festival of Passover. Like the Harvest Moon Festival, Passover is of cultural significance for one section of the community only and its dates vary from year to year.
The statistics reveal that the number of Jewish people dying from natural causes dips sharply just before Passover and bounces back with a compensatory increase immediately afterwards. Again, the fluctuation relates primarily to strokes and heart attacks and no such variation in mortality occurs among non-Jews for whom Passover has no personal significance.
Evidence like this strongly implies the existence of links between our mental or emotional state and our physical health. It is the scientific nature of these mind – body links, and their many ramifications, that we shall be exploring in this book.
Roundheads and Cavaliers
All scientists know of colleagues whose minds are so well equipped with the means of refutation that no new idea has the temerity to seek admittance. Their contribution to science is accordingly very small.
Peter Medawar, A Note on ‘The Scientific Method’ (1949)
I am too much of a sceptic to deny the possibility of anything.
T. H. Huxley, letter to Herbert Spencer (1886)
Contemporary attitudes towards the relationships between mind, body and disease are strangely confused. On the one hand we have the uncritical acceptance by the public, popular media and gurus of New Age medicine that the mind is both the source and the remedy for the majority of bodily ills. Set against these Cavaliers of mind – body interactions we have the Roundhead sceptics, who either dismiss the connections between psychological factors and physical disease as pseudo-scientific wishful thinking, or else simply ignore them altogether.
The tenet that psychological factors play a role in causing or curing bodily diseases is, of course, an ancient one – far older than modern medicine. Throughout history people have held deep-seated beliefs in the power of the mind to influence physical health, and down the centuries (until the twentieth century, anyway) physicians have explicitly linked physical wellbeing with mental wellbeing. It therefore comes as no great surprise to us if a major emotional upset such as bereavement, depression, divorce or redundancy later manifests itself in physical form. Our everyday experience, let alone statistical data from the Gulf War, seems to support this view.
But is this age-old notion of the mind affecting physical health a self-evident truth or merely unsubstantiated pseudo-science? Is it true that we are more likely to fall ill when we are stressed, anxious or depressed? Are individuals with certain personality types more susceptible to colds, allergies, heart disease or cancer? These are questions of profound medical significance. They are also fascinating scientific puzzles.
In ancient times healers worked on the pragmatic basis that the mind and the body are intertwined. Physical disorders could stem from problems in the mind and mental disorders could be reflections of bodily disease. Accordingly, physicians were encouraged to treat the soul and not just the body, using soothing words to comfort the patient’s mind.